Largest man-made structure in the GFFA?

PSW: discuss Star Wars without "versus" arguments.

Moderator: Vympel

Baal
Padawan Learner
Posts: 334
Joined: 2007-01-24 07:27pm

Post by Baal »

Chris OFarrell wrote:Its slightly different from what I did recall, far less detailed, so I'll withdraw the claims, but here is the quote at any rate:
"The Empire has embarked on a new military project", Melan began. "We do not yet know what or where the project is, but we do know it is vast, the Emperor has diverted huge amounts of money, material and men for this secret enterprise".
I mean at this point the Empire is in the throes of a gigantic military buildup post Yavin, but this is a significant enough change to warrant sending Leia an urgent summons to meet a high level officer in the Bothan spynet.
Huge amounts but not huge percentage. As an example to you or me a billion dollars is a huge amount of money. Alot can be bought or built witha that much money. But when compared to the total US Federal Budget a billion isnt that big of a deal.

So it could be a massive amount of money and still be less than 1% of the actual budget.
User avatar
ArcturusMengsk
Padawan Learner
Posts: 416
Joined: 2007-07-31 04:59pm
Location: Illinois

Post by ArcturusMengsk »

This might be a candidate.
so large it was mistaken for a planet
Diocletian had the right idea.
Darth Massacrus
Youngling
Posts: 146
Joined: 2007-07-25 12:29pm
Location: otherspace
Contact:

Post by Darth Massacrus »

I was wondering if anyone had any information on the Star Forge? Like, what possible dimensions it could have had, or how big it was compared to other things like the Death Stars. Any info is appreciated.
S.I.T.H.: Seeks Illicit Teachings and Heresies

Breaking news: News Channel13's helicopter has crashed. News Channel13 is first on the scene...

I bid you Dark Greetings....
User avatar
Galvatron
Decepticon Leader
Posts: 6677
Joined: 2002-07-12 12:27am
Location: This is bad comedy.

Post by Galvatron »

ArcturusMengsk wrote:The Death Star is probably the largest mobile vessel constructed in the GFFA, but there may well be stationary constructs that are larger yet.
"It's too big to be a space station."
User avatar
Illuminatus Primus
All Seeing Eye
Posts: 15774
Joined: 2002-10-12 02:52pm
Location: Gainesville, Florida, USA
Contact:

Post by Illuminatus Primus »

Yeah but they still call it that even after they're clear that its a gigantic mobile siege craft. I wouldn't harp on the terminology too much. Most larger even stationary constructs are probably drilled into or incorporate planetoids or asteroids or existing moons - ref. Hosk Station.
"You know what the problem with Hollywood is. They make shit. Unbelievable. Unremarkable. Shit." - Gabriel Shear, Swordfish

"This statement, in its utterly clueless hubristic stupidity, cannot be improved upon. I merely quote it in admiration of its perfection." - Garibaldi in reply to an incredibly stupid post.

The Fifth Illuminatus Primus | Warsie | Skeptical Empiricist | Florida Gator | Sustainability Advocate | Libertarian Socialist |
Image
User avatar
VT-16
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4662
Joined: 2004-05-13 10:01am
Location: Norway

Post by VT-16 »

I guess artificial planetary rings like Kuat's could be called "shipyards" and not be thought of as regular "space stations". Then of course there's any structure built long before Han's time that he doesn't know about or was destroyed long before then.
FTeik
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2035
Joined: 2002-07-16 04:12pm

Post by FTeik »

Galvatron wrote:
ArcturusMengsk wrote:The Death Star is probably the largest mobile vessel constructed in the GFFA, but there may well be stationary constructs that are larger yet.
"It's too big to be a space station."
This from a guy whose entire home-system is an artificial construct.
The optimist thinks, that we live in the best of all possible worlds and the pessimist is afraid, that this is true.

"Don't ask, what your country can do for you. Ask, what you can do for your country." Mao Tse-Tung.
User avatar
Isolder74
Official SD.Net Ace of Cakes
Posts: 6767
Joined: 2002-07-10 01:16am
Location: Weber State of Construction University
Contact:

Post by Isolder74 »

FTeik wrote:
Galvatron wrote:
ArcturusMengsk wrote:The Death Star is probably the largest mobile vessel constructed in the GFFA, but there may well be stationary constructs that are larger yet.
"It's too big to be a space station."
This from a guy whose entire home-system is an artificial construct.
If I understood the story that's in correctly they didn't know that until around that time.
Hapan Battle Dragons Rule!
When you want peace prepare for war! --Confusious
That was disapointing ..Should we show this Federation how to build a ship so we may have worthy foes? Typhonis 1
The Prince of The Writer's Guild|HAB Spacewolf Tank General| God Bless America!
User avatar
Galvatron
Decepticon Leader
Posts: 6677
Joined: 2002-07-12 12:27am
Location: This is bad comedy.

Post by Galvatron »

Illuminatus Primus wrote:Yeah but they still call it that even after they're clear that its a gigantic mobile siege craft. I wouldn't harp on the terminology too much. Most larger even stationary constructs are probably drilled into or incorporate planetoids or asteroids or existing moons - ref. Hosk Station.
But Han didn't know it was mobile when he said that.
User avatar
The Original Nex
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1593
Joined: 2004-10-18 03:01pm
Location: Boston, MA

Post by The Original Nex »

We are assuming that HAN knows the max size of space stations rather than him talking out of his ass because... :?
User avatar
CaptainChewbacca
Browncoat Wookiee
Posts: 15746
Joined: 2003-05-06 02:36am
Location: Deep beneath Boatmurdered.

Post by CaptainChewbacca »

The Original Nex wrote:We are assuming that HAN knows the max size of space stations rather than him talking out of his ass because... :?
Because he was in the Imperial Navy and has working knowledge of their military equipment and scale.
Stuart: The only problem is, I'm losing track of which universe I'm in.
You kinda look like Jesus. With a lightsaber.- Peregrin Toker
ImageImage
User avatar
Ryan Thunder
Village Idiot
Posts: 4139
Joined: 2007-09-16 07:53pm
Location: Canada

Post by Ryan Thunder »

CaptainChewbacca wrote:
The Original Nex wrote:We are assuming that HAN knows the max size of space stations rather than him talking out of his ass because... :?
Because he was in the Imperial Navy and has working knowledge of their military equipment and scale.
Damnit... Always took him for the hotshot smuggler he seemed to be...
SDN Worlds 5: Sanctum
User avatar
Illuminatus Primus
All Seeing Eye
Posts: 15774
Joined: 2002-10-12 02:52pm
Location: Gainesville, Florida, USA
Contact:

Post by Illuminatus Primus »

Galvatron wrote:
Illuminatus Primus wrote:Yeah but they still call it that even after they're clear that its a gigantic mobile siege craft. I wouldn't harp on the terminology too much. Most larger even stationary constructs are probably drilled into or incorporate planetoids or asteroids or existing moons - ref. Hosk Station.
But Han didn't know it was mobile when he said that.
And you're assuming he's being tight with the meaning of space station when he calls it that still, after he knows its mobile. Clearly whatever definition or idea Han is using for "space station" is not specific to it being stationary. Still, being in the Imperial Navy does not mean you're a naval planner or expert on deployed stations or any of the following. A person from New York could still think Tapei 101 is "too big" to be a skyscraper if they'd never been there, etc.
"You know what the problem with Hollywood is. They make shit. Unbelievable. Unremarkable. Shit." - Gabriel Shear, Swordfish

"This statement, in its utterly clueless hubristic stupidity, cannot be improved upon. I merely quote it in admiration of its perfection." - Garibaldi in reply to an incredibly stupid post.

The Fifth Illuminatus Primus | Warsie | Skeptical Empiricist | Florida Gator | Sustainability Advocate | Libertarian Socialist |
Image
User avatar
Ender
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 11323
Joined: 2002-07-30 11:12pm
Location: Illinois

Post by Ender »

Han could have been looking at mass readings - to resist the recoil from the planet killer beam the Death Star has to mass more then an Earth Sized planet.
بيرني كان سيفوز
*
Nuclear Navy Warwolf
*
in omnibus requiem quaesivi, et nusquam inveni nisi in angulo cum libro
*
ipsa scientia potestas est
User avatar
Illuminatus Primus
All Seeing Eye
Posts: 15774
Joined: 2002-10-12 02:52pm
Location: Gainesville, Florida, USA
Contact:

Post by Illuminatus Primus »

You think it outmassed Alderaan?

We have no definitive data on its strength per average unit of mass characteristics, so how can you be so assured of that? (I don't necessarily disagree; I think the recoil dampening of the Death Star is one of its most extreme engineering feats.)
"You know what the problem with Hollywood is. They make shit. Unbelievable. Unremarkable. Shit." - Gabriel Shear, Swordfish

"This statement, in its utterly clueless hubristic stupidity, cannot be improved upon. I merely quote it in admiration of its perfection." - Garibaldi in reply to an incredibly stupid post.

The Fifth Illuminatus Primus | Warsie | Skeptical Empiricist | Florida Gator | Sustainability Advocate | Libertarian Socialist |
Image
User avatar
Ender
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 11323
Joined: 2002-07-30 11:12pm
Location: Illinois

Post by Ender »

Illuminatus Primus wrote:You think it outmassed Alderaan?
I think it is likely, yes.
We have no definitive data on its strength per average unit of mass characteristics, so how can you be so assured of that? (I don't necessarily disagree; I think the recoil dampening of the Death Star is one of its most extreme engineering feats.)
Well, Alderaan suffered a change in momentum of 4*10^31 kgm/s, so so did the Death Star. We know it can pull 100 Gs, so the engines going full out as it fires can knock 3 orders of magnitude off that. So the question is how fast, it at all, was it sent back? 100 m/s? 1 km/s? 10 km/s? There is nothing for it to brace against, so it's mass has to be the limit here.
بيرني كان سيفوز
*
Nuclear Navy Warwolf
*
in omnibus requiem quaesivi, et nusquam inveni nisi in angulo cum libro
*
ipsa scientia potestas est
User avatar
Surlethe
HATES GRADING
Posts: 12272
Joined: 2004-12-29 03:41pm

Post by Surlethe »

Illuminatus Primus wrote:You think it outmassed Alderaan?
Why not? A large part of the mass is the fuel (if it's being stored as mass rather than as relativistic tachyonic matter -- how's that for stating assumptions?); if the ship carries enough fuel for 1000 shots, then it's on the order of the Earth's mass already. And even if the mass is stored as relativistic KE, why wouldn't that contribute to the station's mass and inertia when viewed from a resting frame?
A Government founded upon justice, and recognizing the equal rights of all men; claiming higher authority for existence, or sanction for its laws, that nature, reason, and the regularly ascertained will of the people; steadily refusing to put its sword and purse in the service of any religious creed or family is a standing offense to most of the Governments of the world, and to some narrow and bigoted people among ourselves.
F. Douglass
Pelranius
Sith Marauder
Posts: 3539
Joined: 2006-10-24 11:35am
Location: Around and about the Beltway

Post by Pelranius »

I don't suppose there are any canonical examples of Dyson spheres in the GFFA? (granted, hypermatter reactors would make them into mere vanity projects)
Turns out that a five way cross over between It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia, the Ali G Show, Fargo, Idiocracy and Veep is a lot less funny when you're actually living in it.
User avatar
Illuminatus Primus
All Seeing Eye
Posts: 15774
Joined: 2002-10-12 02:52pm
Location: Gainesville, Florida, USA
Contact:

Post by Illuminatus Primus »

Who said it had 1000 full-power shots? That would put it way above Ender's peak power duration for most warships. We already considered this. And you curiously imply that relativistic hypermatter fuel (the canonical power source of the Death Star and implicitly, all major combat starships) wouldn't contribute to the inertia of the Death Star in your first sentence - why's that? I understand it as SW is at the high-end of E=mc^2 limits, with hypermatter simply being a non-volatile way to store mass-energy for direct annhiliation that conveniently also serves to fix the complex mass of SW ships during transitions to and fro hyperspace, and not a get-out-of-inertial-limitations-free card.
"You know what the problem with Hollywood is. They make shit. Unbelievable. Unremarkable. Shit." - Gabriel Shear, Swordfish

"This statement, in its utterly clueless hubristic stupidity, cannot be improved upon. I merely quote it in admiration of its perfection." - Garibaldi in reply to an incredibly stupid post.

The Fifth Illuminatus Primus | Warsie | Skeptical Empiricist | Florida Gator | Sustainability Advocate | Libertarian Socialist |
Image
User avatar
VT-16
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4662
Joined: 2004-05-13 10:01am
Location: Norway

Post by VT-16 »

their military equipment and scale
So, you're saying he might be referring to military installations and not space stations in general?
User avatar
Illuminatus Primus
All Seeing Eye
Posts: 15774
Joined: 2002-10-12 02:52pm
Location: Gainesville, Florida, USA
Contact:

Post by Illuminatus Primus »

Pelranius wrote:I don't suppose there are any canonical examples of Dyson spheres in the GFFA? (granted, hypermatter reactors would make them into mere vanity projects)
Hypermatter is a novel form of energy storage; its not an energy source.

Saxton proposed that stellar corpses are a likely source of energy to their compact state; rotating black holes permit energy mining by means of the Penrose process. Neutron stars that rotate with powerful magnetic fields may be accessed just a dynamo functions. Alternatively, if they have arbitrarily refined control of direct mass annhiliation through engineered black holes or a more exotic process like the "nucleonic" chain-reactions that the Galaxy Gun warheads function by, they could simply use any supply of matter. Though the bleeding-edge nature of this technology suggests that is not so. Though if they're desperate enough it'd still be worth it to Dyson Sphere black holes, neutron stars, and white dwarves that cannot be accessed by the aforementioned means. Basically I think pulsars and rotating black holes are probably the major primary energy sources of the galactic civilization.
"You know what the problem with Hollywood is. They make shit. Unbelievable. Unremarkable. Shit." - Gabriel Shear, Swordfish

"This statement, in its utterly clueless hubristic stupidity, cannot be improved upon. I merely quote it in admiration of its perfection." - Garibaldi in reply to an incredibly stupid post.

The Fifth Illuminatus Primus | Warsie | Skeptical Empiricist | Florida Gator | Sustainability Advocate | Libertarian Socialist |
Image
User avatar
Surlethe
HATES GRADING
Posts: 12272
Joined: 2004-12-29 03:41pm

Post by Surlethe »

Illuminatus Primus wrote:Who said it had 1000 full-power shots? That would put it way above Ender's peak power duration for most warships. We already considered this.
I'm not familiar with Ender's calculations, but why would having enough stored fuel for 1000 full-power shots put it way above peak power duration? I'm not saying that they can generate enough power for 1000 full-power shots at once.
And you curiously imply that relativistic hypermatter fuel (the canonical power source of the Death Star and implicitly, all major combat starships) wouldn't contribute to the inertia of the Death Star in your first sentence - why's that?
Did I imply that? I had meant simply to state the assumption that the energy is being released by direct matter-energy conversion rather than in an object's speed. Didn't my last sentence make clear that energy stored as relativistic KE still contributes to mass and inertia?
A Government founded upon justice, and recognizing the equal rights of all men; claiming higher authority for existence, or sanction for its laws, that nature, reason, and the regularly ascertained will of the people; steadily refusing to put its sword and purse in the service of any religious creed or family is a standing offense to most of the Governments of the world, and to some narrow and bigoted people among ourselves.
F. Douglass
User avatar
Illuminatus Primus
All Seeing Eye
Posts: 15774
Joined: 2002-10-12 02:52pm
Location: Gainesville, Florida, USA
Contact:

Post by Illuminatus Primus »

Surlethe wrote:I'm not familiar with Ender's calculations, but why would having enough stored fuel for 1000 full-power shots put it way above peak power duration? I'm not saying that they can generate enough power for 1000 full-power shots at once.
Well Saxton figures your average ship has peak power duration of less than a whole day. So 1000 shots averaged over the peak power output of the reactor would seem to yield such a result. But that's guess work.
Surlethe wrote:Did I imply that? I had meant simply to state the assumption that the energy is being released by direct matter-energy conversion rather than in an object's speed. Didn't my last sentence make clear that energy stored as relativistic KE still contributes to mass and inertia?
Relativistic KE is really not meaningfully different in this case from raw mass, is it? I agree; I think that SW ships store a relatively low rest mass of tachyons (whatever an imaginary figure like that means) but its decelerated to near light-speed where it has enormous mass-energy equivalence from its relativistic velocity (the mirror image of high relativistic velocity bradyonic matter). I suspect the work to do this is done by energy extraction from black holes and pulsars. How they harness or confine the circulating tachyons is anyone's guess. All tachyons would tend to lose energy and accelerate to infinite speed due to energy loss to Cherenkov radiation by any interaction, be it gravitational, electromagnetic, etc. I suspect they use stasis fields to slow that tendency to a near stop, and its relinquished under controlled circumstances to yield up all its energy in the annhiliation reactor. I'm partial to Mike's "invisible cloud" storage mechanism because it frees up the silos for propellant but who knows. One can only hypothesize so much since relativity obviously breaks in a universe where FTL information transmission is practical.
"You know what the problem with Hollywood is. They make shit. Unbelievable. Unremarkable. Shit." - Gabriel Shear, Swordfish

"This statement, in its utterly clueless hubristic stupidity, cannot be improved upon. I merely quote it in admiration of its perfection." - Garibaldi in reply to an incredibly stupid post.

The Fifth Illuminatus Primus | Warsie | Skeptical Empiricist | Florida Gator | Sustainability Advocate | Libertarian Socialist |
Image
User avatar
Dooey Jo
Sith Devotee
Posts: 3127
Joined: 2002-08-09 01:09pm
Location: The land beyond the forest; Sweden.
Contact:

Post by Dooey Jo »

If the DS is as massive as Alderaan, that implies that they could take those sublight engines, put them on the planet, and drive it into the sun. Also, it would have a surface gravity of about 11000 G. That's... quite a lot.
Image
"Nippon ichi, bitches! Boing-boing."
Mai smote the demonic fires of heck...

Faker Ninjas invented ninjitsu
User avatar
Ender
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 11323
Joined: 2002-07-30 11:12pm
Location: Illinois

Post by Ender »

Illuminatus Primus wrote: One can only hypothesize so much since relativity obviously breaks in a universe where FTL information transmission is practical.
What on earth are you talking about? Relativity is only incompatible with FTL if casualty is not violated. But we know that casualty is routinely violated in this universe - the impacts of it are just limited by the Force itself.
بيرني كان سيفوز
*
Nuclear Navy Warwolf
*
in omnibus requiem quaesivi, et nusquam inveni nisi in angulo cum libro
*
ipsa scientia potestas est
Post Reply