Posted: 2003-02-03 02:57pm
I think he means he's mad because the media's using the space shuttle part to whore it out and make money.Spanky The Dolphin wrote:That's rather harsh, man.
Get your fill of sci-fi, science, and mockery of stupid ideas
http://stardestroyer.dyndns-home.com/
I think he means he's mad because the media's using the space shuttle part to whore it out and make money.Spanky The Dolphin wrote:That's rather harsh, man.
That too.StarshipTitanic wrote:I think he means he's mad because the media's using the space shuttle part to whore it out and make money.Spanky The Dolphin wrote:That's rather harsh, man.
Well to be honest, fuck the media.Ted wrote:That too.StarshipTitanic wrote:I think he means he's mad because the media's using the space shuttle part to whore it out and make money.Spanky The Dolphin wrote:That's rather harsh, man.
I'll risk the flames. It was 9/11. I just saw it as another piece of news and don't really understand why people like my parents (Who didn't know anybody there and had no connection to it at all ,6 degrees of seperation withstanding) would just sit in front of the telly all day watching the same footage over and over. You know whats happened, you can make an educated guess what else will happen (ie. the tower(s) will fall down) and you've already got a good idea of who had done it (split between Bin Laden, Saddam and Gaddaffi in our house) so why sit in front of the TV watching it over and over again! It was hardly riveting stuff! They showed the video of the crash every five minutes and basically kept on repeating that at <time it happened> jets crashed into the WTC, Pentagon and Pennsylvania (sp).verilon wrote:9/11? I wasn't phased. My sentiments exactly, though.2000AD wrote:Me too. I just saw it as another part of the news. If someone i knew, or someone my friends knew, had died then i might be a bit more involved. There's been other major things and i haven't been that bothered about them, but i'm not naming those because i know i'll definately get flamed to hell!
so what has jaded you so much that you are able to watch 3000 people perish on live television without so much as batting an eyelash? i'm not flaming, i'm curious. i know i may have more colored judgement being that it happened so close to me, but if i were to turn on the TV and see 3000 people die in a live broadcast in another country thousands of miles awayi would feel sorrow and anger and a desire for justice.2000AD wrote:I'll risk the flames. It was 9/11. I just saw it as another piece of news and don't really understand why people like my parents (Who didn't know anybody there and had no connection to it at all ,6 degrees of seperation withstanding) would just sit in front of the telly all day watching the same footage over and over. You know whats happened, you can make an educated guess what else will happen (ie. the tower(s) will fall down) and you've already got a good idea of who had done it (split between Bin Laden, Saddam and Gaddaffi in our house) so why sit in front of the TV watching it over and over again! It was hardly riveting stuff! They showed the video of the crash every five minutes and basically kept on repeating that at <time it happened> jets crashed into the WTC, Pentagon and Pennsylvania (sp).verilon wrote:9/11? I wasn't phased. My sentiments exactly, though.2000AD wrote:Me too. I just saw it as another part of the news. If someone i knew, or someone my friends knew, had died then i might be a bit more involved. There's been other major things and i haven't been that bothered about them, but i'm not naming those because i know i'll definately get flamed to hell!
It probably helps when you're not in the same country that it occurs.2000AD wrote:I don't know whats jaded me (if anything), all know is that to me it was another piece of news.
Could be.Spanky The Dolphin wrote:It probably helps when you're not in the same country that it occurs.2000AD wrote:I don't know whats jaded me (if anything), all know is that to me it was another piece of news.
that's a good idea, but also i think private interests should be allowed to build and use manned spacecraft within the boundaries of law and government oversight. no big invention, be it the automobile, airplane or computer was ever able to thrive under the exclusive control of government.Skelron wrote:Personally I was more worried that this could mean the end of manned flight into space, something that needs to continue. As a side note I believe that a International consortium of nations should get together and guarentee enough money to ensure that a second generation space Shuttle type craft is produced and maintained.
so could you sit and watch someone like hitler or pol pot kill by the millions? how many people have to die at the hands of a few lunitics before your brain synapses fire and you say hey, maybe this is bad?Enforcer Talen wrote:I didnt feel a thing on 9/11. said so at the time, too. I knew no one, it was an act of war, and people die in war. course, I felt sad for the challenger, cuz it was just a construction mistake. they signed up for it, but still, losing your life cuz some glue was off is just sad.
Until that moment, it was merely one group of people plotting to murder another group; no declaration of war had been given. Those people who were killed on 9/11 were not soldiers falling in battle, they were students, businessmen, tourists, bankers, real estate agents, policemen, firemen, hot dog vendors, etc. They did not volunteer to be involved; my heart still goes out to their friends and families, because I easily could have been one of the ones searching for lost family.Enforcer Talen wrote:I didnt feel a thing on 9/11. said so at the time, too. I knew no one, it was an act of war, and people die in war.
You have a right to your opinion, but shrugging off thousands of civilian deaths like it was nothing in an act that STARTED a war and feeling sorry for a handful of people who died because of faulty equipment that has always been a danger of their job seems a bit juxtaposed to me. But maybe that's just me.course, I felt sad for the challenger, cuz it was just a construction mistake. they signed up for it, but still, losing your life cuz some glue was off is just sad.
I am in another country.Spanky The Dolphin wrote:It probably helps when you're not in the same country that it occurs.2000AD wrote:I don't know whats jaded me (if anything), all know is that to me it was another piece of news.
I'm surprised i didn't get flamed!ArmorPierce wrote:Wow, I'm suprised, Ted didn't get flamed
surprise is essential in war. the u.s. has done it's share of civilian slaughter - carpet bombing works quite well. civilians, as a support to a war machine, are a target. it's sad, yes. I know it causes grief. but on a purely emotional level, I felt nothing.Zaia wrote:Until that moment, it was merely one group of people plotting to murder another group; no declaration of war had been given. Those people who were killed on 9/11 were not soldiers falling in battle, they were students, businessmen, tourists, bankers, real estate agents, policemen, firemen, hot dog vendors, etc. They did not volunteer to be involved; my heart still goes out to their friends and families, because I easily could have been one of the ones searching for lost family.Enforcer Talen wrote:I didnt feel a thing on 9/11. said so at the time, too. I knew no one, it was an act of war, and people die in war.
You have a right to your opinion, but shrugging off thousands of civilian deaths like it was nothing in an act that STARTED a war and feeling sorry for a handful of people who died because of faulty equipment that has always been a danger of their job seems a bit juxtaposed to me. But maybe that's just me.course, I felt sad for the challenger, cuz it was just a construction mistake. they signed up for it, but still, losing your life cuz some glue was off is just sad.