Also a waste of money, space and a big maintenance hassle. The ship's only going to have mabey 30 fixed wing strike aircraft. It wouldn't be worth the great cost of adapting the Typhoon only to buy perhaps 40 of them. I very much doubt the tail hook can take a carrier landing, those on USAF aircraft sure can't.Dirty Harry wrote:Does anyone know if were going to get a navalised version of the Eurofighter Typoon? If the carrier could operate both this and the F-35, that would be pretty sweet.
Blair blocked ship deal to snub Chirac
Moderator: Edi
-
Sea Skimmer
- Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
- Posts: 37389
- Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
- Location: Passchendaele City, HAB
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
-
kheegster
- Jedi Council Member
- Posts: 2397
- Joined: 2002-09-14 02:29am
- Location: An oasis in the wastelands of NJ
Eh? Why would USAF aircraft have hooks?Sea Skimmer wrote:Also a waste of money, space and a big maintenance hassle. The ship's only going to have mabey 30 fixed wing strike aircraft. It wouldn't be worth the great cost of adapting the Typhoon only to buy perhaps 40 of them. I very much doubt the tail hook can take a carrier landing, those on USAF aircraft sure can't.Dirty Harry wrote:Does anyone know if were going to get a navalised version of the Eurofighter Typoon? If the carrier could operate both this and the F-35, that would be pretty sweet.
Articles, opinions and rants from an astrophysicist: Cosmic Journeys
-
MKSheppard
- Ruthless Genocidal Warmonger
- Posts: 29842
- Joined: 2002-07-06 06:34pm
To slow them down faster, and to allow short field landings....kheegan wrote: Eh? Why would USAF aircraft have hooks?
(mind you, not as SHORT as that of a carrier flight deck....more
like several hundred feet of concrete, rather than 40 feet of carrier
deck....)
"If scientists and inventors who develop disease cures and useful technologies don't get lifetime royalties, I'd like to know what fucking rationale you have for some guy getting lifetime royalties for writing an episode of Full House." - Mike Wong
"The present air situation in the Pacific is entirely the result of fighting a fifth rate air power." - U.S. Navy Memo - 24 July 1944
"The present air situation in the Pacific is entirely the result of fighting a fifth rate air power." - U.S. Navy Memo - 24 July 1944
-
Admiral Valdemar
- Outside Context Problem
- Posts: 31572
- Joined: 2002-07-04 07:17pm
- Location: UK
Yeah, got to remember that carrier aircraft are extremely rugged, these things have to accelerate and decelerate at many gees and often on very weak points of a normal aircraft.MKSheppard wrote:To slow them down faster, and to allow short field landings....kheegan wrote: Eh? Why would USAF aircraft have hooks?
(mind you, not as SHORT as that of a carrier flight deck....more
like several hundred feet of concrete, rather than 40 feet of carrier
deck....)
Though a naval EFA would be cool if impractical for the above reasons of cost etc. Mind you, the Russians managed to get the MiG-29 and Su-37 flying off the Kuznetsov and that was a glorified cruiser they say.
Actually, the Typhoon was in the running against the JSF.Sea Skimmer wrote:Also a waste of money, space and a big maintenance hassle. The ship's only going to have mabey 30 fixed wing strike aircraft. It wouldn't be worth the great cost of adapting the Typhoon only to buy perhaps 40 of them. I very much doubt the tail hook can take a carrier landing, those on USAF aircraft sure can't.Dirty Harry wrote:Does anyone know if were going to get a navalised version of the Eurofighter Typoon? If the carrier could operate both this and the F-35, that would be pretty sweet.
It wouldn't've been much hassle to make a complete navlized variant with folding wings and better 'hook.
Go, tell the Spartans, stranger passing by,
That here, obedient to their laws, we lie.
That here, obedient to their laws, we lie.