Posted: 2008-07-17 12:03am
The surface guns on the first Death Star couldn't hit shit either.
Get your fill of sci-fi, science, and mockery of stupid ideas
http://stardestroyer.dyndns-home.com/
Supposedly (according to the Essential Guide, etc.) a completed DSII would have featured a more more complete and effective network of defensive turrets, sufficient to massacre a starfighter attack. Given that the fire was no more effective than that on the DSI, we can assume that the defensive batteries were at a minimal operational level.Darth Raptor wrote:The surface guns on the first Death Star couldn't hit shit either.
I believe in the Agents of Chaos novel dealing with Fondor, the NR was building something like 30 Star Detroyer type vessles in under a year (I think around 7-8 months). I dont know how efficient they were, but I know the Empire was more efficient than the Republic (They could build 2 ISDs in the time it took the Old Republic time to build one VSD as I recall.)Fingolfin_Noldor wrote:Well, the New Republic was said during the Yuuzhan Vong War to have replaced all its initial losses in.. 1-2 years? I guess if you push the ship builders hard, they will just employ tonnes of droids to do the job.
Would be interesting to see the fleet necessary to mount a successful conventional assault against DSII.Pablo Sanchez wrote:Supposedly (according to the Essential Guide, etc.) a completed DSII would have featured a more more complete and effective network of defensive turrets, sufficient to massacre a starfighter attack. Given that the fire was no more effective than that on the DSI, we can assume that the defensive batteries were at a minimal operational level.Darth Raptor wrote:The surface guns on the first Death Star couldn't hit shit either.