StarDestroyer.Net BBS

It takes a real man to put a baby-seat in an Aston Martin.

SirNitram wrote:It takes a real man to put a baby-seat in an Aston Martin.

So long as the Gee forces from accelerating don't turn the baby into baby food.

Would that make my heavily modded original car a "Kraut Rocket" (Volkswagen '54 heb, with oversized engine, dune racing transmission etc. (Thanks mom) which I still wonder whose stoned idea it was to "Trickout" such a Hippie Classic)

It's really quite sad that I can polish off anything up to mildly souped up Integra's with my dad's big Buick Lesabre. Not much short of a Type R will beat the Buick in a stoplight race, that's what loads of low end torque will for you. The thing is those Civics and whatnot have pretty narrow power and torque curves so they're only fast within a narrow rev range, mis-time a single shift and oops. The Buick on the other hand has a wide power band and it'll accelerate strongly throughout it's entire engine rev range, which is why I can smoke almost any rice car with a 6 passenger family sedan. Of course the Buick corners about as well as an oil tanker, but hey, it's big enough that several couples could have sex in the car at the same time.

Admiral Valdemar wrote:

SirNitram wrote:It takes a real man to put a baby-seat in an Aston Martin.

So long as the Gee forces from accelerating don't turn the baby into baby food.

Just make sure you have the James Bond autopilot when the wee one drops their toy and you have to root around for it.

SirNitram wrote:

Admiral Valdemar wrote:

SirNitram wrote:It takes a real man to put a baby-seat in an Aston Martin.

So long as the Gee forces from accelerating don't turn the baby into baby food.

Just make sure you have the James Bond autopilot when the wee one drops their toy and you have to root around for it.

Yeah, but you may hit the active-cloak system or ejector seat or better yet, send numerous unguided rockets into whomever is infront of you.

Admiral Valdemar wrote:

SirNitram wrote:

Admiral Valdemar wrote: So long as the Gee forces from accelerating don't turn the baby into baby food.

Just make sure you have the James Bond autopilot when the wee one drops their toy and you have to root around for it.

Yeah, but you may hit the active-cloak system or ejector seat or better yet, send numerous unguided rockets into whomever is infront of you.

[Bond] Just the thing to unwind after a long day's work.[/Bond]

SirNitram wrote:

Admiral Valdemar wrote:

SirNitram wrote: Just make sure you have the James Bond autopilot when the wee one drops their toy and you have to root around for it.

Yeah, but you may hit the active-cloak system or ejector seat or better yet, send numerous unguided rockets into whomever is infront of you.

[Bond] Just the thing to unwind after a long day's work.[/Bond]

[Bond]Backseat drivers.[/Bond]

Admiral Valdemar wrote:

SirNitram wrote:It takes a real man to put a baby-seat in an Aston Martin.

So long as the Gee forces from accelerating don't turn the baby into baby food.

When I was a baby, my dad had a Fiat, and he and my mom would squish a basket into the 'back seat' (it was actually more like a bench--no seat belts or anything--reeeeeeeeally small), toss me in there, and go screamin' around town.

I was a cool little baby.

I always loved those ads where they ask which car is the manliest. They pan over a Lamborghini Diablo, a Ferrari, a Hummer, and finally ... to a minivan. The minivan is, of course, the manliest car because only a grown man with a family will buy one. The pissant overcompensating strut-boyz get the others.

Name me someplace I can get Armored Plating and an Topside MG installed on a Mini-Van and I'll happy trade in my Hummer

Wonder how well a stock '72 Cougar with a 351 Cleveland would do. I'm referring to this link:

http://popularmechanics.com/automotive/ ... rint.phtml

XPViking

a firehawk and a 1987 Buick Regal T-Type

the Car and Driver article for the Buick was "Darth Vader, your car is ready!" Those cars are truely an impressive site.

The Firehawk well its a souped up Firebird nuf said

Moonshadow wrote:a firehawk and a 1987 Buick Regal T-Type

the Car and Driver article for the Buick was "Darth Vader, your car is ready!" Those cars are truely an impressive site.

The Firehawk well its a souped up Firebird nuf said

I've seen the Buick Regal turbos in action. They can't handle worth shit, and they have trouble putting the power to the ground in a straight line. The fact that a brilliant driver can compensate for these problems does not mean it's actually a decent performance car.

Pants-creaming power is nice, but I've always been partial to offroaders; that's part of the reason I bought my truck. I know my truck won't be able to do any serious rock crawling, but at least I can explore old access trails behind my house in the summer with relative confidence.

Maybe if I get rich one day I'll get a GTO and rock-crawler. And what the hell, a WRC car, too!

AdmiralKanos wrote:

Moonshadow wrote:a firehawk and a 1987 Buick Regal T-Type

the Car and Driver article for the Buick was "Darth Vader, your car is ready!" Those cars are truely an impressive site.

The Firehawk well its a souped up Firebird nuf said

I've seen the Buick Regal turbos in action. They can't handle worth shit, and they have trouble putting the power to the ground in a straight line. The fact that a brilliant driver can compensate for these problems does not mean it's actually a decent performance car.

No, but showing off brilliant driving can be an end in and of itself.

I love my uncle Eric's Jag. Power+handling (now if the electrical didn't suck ass)

Darth Wong wrote:The minivan is, of course, the manliest car because only a grown man with a family will buy one.

"Luke, I am your father's minivan!"




As a side note, has anybody else than me checked this site out??

Well, its hall of shame features THIS:



Taken directly from the site:

"If the stories I've heard about this car are true, then this car is actually seen at races often, and has NOS underhood... and doesn't really classify as a Rice-Rocket. However, I thought the stories I heard were pretty funny so I wanted to share them with the world. I've heard that the driver knows that this car is not very fast (even with NOS) but it is faster than most Civics out there. So what's with the giant HYUNDAI on the side of the car? Well, when he does win races, he wants the whole world (especially the opposing driver) to know that they just got burned by a Hyundai!!!"

Simon H.Johansen wrote:As a side note, has anybody else than me checked this site out??

Well, its hall of shame features THIS:

http://riceboypage.com/shame/classic/hyundai.jpg

Taken directly from the site:

"If the stories I've heard about this car are true, then this car is actually seen at races often, and has NOS underhood... and doesn't really classify as a Rice-Rocket. However, I thought the stories I heard were pretty funny so I wanted to share them with the world. I've heard that the driver knows that this car is not very fast (even with NOS) but it is faster than most Civics out there. So what's with the giant HYUNDAI on the side of the car? Well, when he does win races, he wants the whole world (especially the opposing driver) to know that they just got burned by a Hyundai!!!"

Could be worse. Could be a Daewoo.

How about the classic Dodge charger... (AKA the Blademobile). There's also one with a huge air intake appears in the movie The Fast & The Furious... guy floors the gas and the thing rears up like a wild beast, front wheels in the air.

I wonder if it could actually do that... I mean it could just have been a "movie thing", but I wouldn't be surprised if it actually could do that (the power-wheelie I mean).

AWACS wrote:How about the classic Dodge charger... (AKA the Blademobile). There's also one with a huge air intake appears in the movie The Fast & The Furious... guy floors the gas and the thing rears up like a wild beast, front wheels in the air.

I wonder if it could actually do that... I mean it could just have been a "movie thing", but I wouldn't be surprised if it actually could do that (the power-wheelie I mean).

It could possibly do it if the rear shocks were softened. Chargers were powerful buggers. 425 horses and 480 ft.lbs. of torque. I think they're #3 on the power list for muscle cars. It would be more likely to just spin the tires, IMHO.

neoolong wrote:Could be worse. Could be a Daewoo.

Worse. Kia.

Heh. You mean GM-Daewoo now.

XPViking

71 Dodge Challenger RT.

Oh dear god yes.

The Dark wrote:

neoolong wrote:Could be worse. Could be a Daewoo.

Worse. Kia.

I never fail to get a laugh out of the fact that there's a car company out there whose name is the acronym for "Killed In Action".

If anyone's interested, this month's Popular Science has some ultra-Rice Rockets on it, including a Toyota Supra with over 1000hp.

Said magazine also has an article on the YAL-1A (Airborne Laser)

Sidious wrote:71 Dodge Challenger RT.

Oh dear god yes.

Now we're talkin', with the 440 Six-Pack and a Hurst 4-speed.