Page 2 of 3

Re: My gun is bigger!

Posted: 2003-02-14 06:20am
by Einhander Sn0m4n
Crix Dorius wrote:http://www.panzerbaer.de/images/bw_pzh_ ... en-001.JPG

German Firepower :wink:
Welcome back! You and Kenny ever settle yall's differences btw?

Posted: 2003-02-14 08:26am
by Alyrium Denryle
Beats all of yours

Image

Posted: 2003-02-14 03:57pm
by Sea Skimmer
Dahak wrote:
Simon H.Johansen wrote:
Why would a tank need a silencer??
According to the pic title, it is a armoured mobile howitzer.
It's a Pz2000 155mm howitzer. And they need it because Germany has all sorts of noise registrations on military testing and maneuvers. That’s why Germany and the UK conduct training in America and Canada so often, they don't have domestic ranges they can use with significant sized forces.

Posted: 2003-02-14 04:29pm
by Crayz9000
Sea Skimmer wrote:
phongn wrote:~$300,000,000, eh? Nah, a bit rich for an orbital laser. I'd prefer an SS-18 for my mass destruction.
My B-70B stealth Valkyrie's own your puny ICBM's.
How do you propose to stealth the B-70? That thing is, like, fucking huge...

Posted: 2003-02-14 07:20pm
by Sea Skimmer
Crayz9000 wrote:
Sea Skimmer wrote:
phongn wrote:~$300,000,000, eh? Nah, a bit rich for an orbital laser. I'd prefer an SS-18 for my mass destruction.
My B-70B stealth Valkyrie's own your puny ICBM's.
How do you propose to stealth the B-70? That thing is, like, fucking huge...
Size has little to do with RCS, its how you shape the craft, a 9,000 ton DDG-51 looks smaller then a 500 ton trawler because of its shape on radar, no RAM is used. However the B-70's shape is also shit for stealth, the inlets could never be passivly protected.


So I'd use active stealth,Ionization shielding also known as plasma shielding, same stuff that cut off communications to reentering Apollo capsules.

In theory you could use it to make a flying cube stealth. Of course it's also not going to be around for 50-100 years according to basically everyone, but the Russians. They've claimed to have it working for years, despite never haven't a bit of proof and experts who have actually built stealth warplanes saying its bull.

It alosh vae a double blind, your own radios or radar wont work. But with todays INS systems, who gives a damn? Plus I'm going mach 3 at 70,000 feet, 90% of the worlds air defences can't hit me without any stealth at all.

Re: My gun is bigger!

Posted: 2003-02-14 10:46pm
by Grand Admiral Thrawn
Crix Dorius wrote: German Firepower :wink:


[Black Mage] Leave it to Germans to build a 1000mm cannon to fire a 155mm shell.

Posted: 2003-02-14 10:54pm
by phongn
Sea Skimmer wrote:
phongn wrote:~$300,000,000, eh? Nah, a bit rich for an orbital laser. I'd prefer an SS-18 for my mass destruction.
My B-70B stealth Valkyrie's own your puny ICBM's.

Nothing beats a SLAM laden with Neutron bombs for shear redundancy of damage though.
Bah, I'll just fire the Pluto Atomic Cruise Missile at you, preceded by ALBM strikes.

Posted: 2003-02-14 11:12pm
by weemadando
I give you the replacement to the Crusader program. The "Penis Envy"-type artillery piece.

Posted: 2003-02-14 11:17pm
by Sea Skimmer
phongn wrote:
Sea Skimmer wrote:
phongn wrote:~$300,000,000, eh? Nah, a bit rich for an orbital laser. I'd prefer an SS-18 for my mass destruction.
My B-70B stealth Valkyrie's own your puny ICBM's.

Nothing beats a SLAM laden with Neutron bombs for shear redundancy of damage though.
Bah, I'll just fire the Pluto Atomic Cruise Missile at you, preceded by ALBM strikes.
Pluto and SLAM are the same thing. And my EB-1C's megawank bombers can provide mobile survivable ABM and anti missile defence for my forces.

Posted: 2003-02-14 11:32pm
by weemadando
Sea Skimmer wrote:
Pluto and SLAM are the same thing. And my EB-1C's megawank bombers can provide mobile survivable ABM and anti missile defence for my forces.
But my technowank though controlled variable geometry forward swept wing fighter will own you!

Posted: 2003-02-14 11:43pm
by Sea Skimmer
weemadando wrote:
Sea Skimmer wrote:
Pluto and SLAM are the same thing. And my EB-1C's megawank bombers can provide mobile survivable ABM and anti missile defence for my forces.
But my technowank though controlled variable geometry forward swept wing fighter will own you!
For a couple missions perhaps, then your weapons system with catch fire and the doors with jam and of course the crew will shoot each other in the middle of an air battle while your destroyer forgets about its 30mm CIWS.

Then my uber cargo plane and anti physics armor and shoulder fired tank guns will own your puny ass.

Posted: 2003-02-14 11:46pm
by weemadando
Sea Skimmer wrote: For a couple missions perhaps, then your weapons system with catch fire and the doors with jam and of course the crew will shoot each other in the middle of an air battle while your destroyer forgets about its 30mm CIWS.

Then my uber cargo plane and anti physics armor and shoulder fired tank guns will own your puny ass.
But what you do not know is that my +5/+5 infallible ECM suite is capable of tricking even dumb-fire weapons into missing.

Posted: 2003-02-14 11:52pm
by Sea Skimmer
weemadando wrote:
Sea Skimmer wrote: For a couple missions perhaps, then your weapons system with catch fire and the doors with jam and of course the crew will shoot each other in the middle of an air battle while your destroyer forgets about its 30mm CIWS.

Then my uber cargo plane and anti physics armor and shoulder fired tank guns will own your puny ass.
But what you do not know is that my +5/+5 infallible ECM suite is capable of tricking even dumb-fire weapons into missing.
But that won't save you plane from being shot down by my Uzi armed Spec Opts team from "The Delta force, the orginal B special forces moive". A force that's character shields are so powerful, truck, jeeps and M113's piled with terrorists are incapable of even firing at its commander, nor preventing him from wiping out there convoy with a rocket armed motorcycle.

Posted: 2003-02-14 11:59pm
by weemadando
Sea Skimmer wrote: But that won't save you plane from being shot down by my Uzi armed Spec Opts team from "The Delta force, the orginal B special forces moive". A force that's character shields are so powerful, truck, jeeps and M113's piled with terrorists are incapable of even firing at its commander, nor preventing him from wiping out there convoy with a rocket armed motorcycle.
Pah - do not make me unleash the fury of the "Rambo Balboa" character shield!

He'll be beaten up the first time, but then you better watch out!

Posted: 2003-02-15 12:04am
by Sea Skimmer
weemadando wrote:
Sea Skimmer wrote: But that won't save you plane from being shot down by my Uzi armed Spec Opts team from "The Delta force, the orginal B special forces moive". A force that's character shields are so powerful, truck, jeeps and M113's piled with terrorists are incapable of even firing at its commander, nor preventing him from wiping out there convoy with a rocket armed motorcycle.
Pah - do not make me unleash the fury of the "Rambo Balboa" character shield!

He'll be beaten up the first time, but then you better watch out!
But once he learns your country abandon Vietnam to its fate, and that your secretly keeping POW's in the outback all of Australia is fucked.

Posted: 2003-02-15 12:19am
by weemadando
Sea Skimmer wrote:
But once he learns your country abandon Vietnam to its fate, and that your secretly keeping POW's in the outback all of Australia is fucked.
But then we throw the switch to "Balboa" mode and point him teh direction of Delta Force...

Posted: 2003-02-15 01:22am
by Dennis Toy
Image

Now this is the badboy, a rail-gum

Posted: 2003-02-15 01:36am
by Marcus
I know I left my Q-38 Space Modulator around her somewhere... pesky planet, obscuring my view of Mercury...

Posted: 2003-02-15 01:53am
by Enlightenment
You people just aren't thinking big enough.

Image

Cookie to anyone who can figure out why this is relevant to a firepower thread.

Posted: 2003-02-15 03:42am
by Beowulf
Star exploding?

Posted: 2003-02-15 03:48am
by Enlightenment
Beowulf wrote:Star exploding?
Bigger.

Posted: 2003-02-15 04:41am
by XaLEv
Enlightenment wrote:
Beowulf wrote:Star exploding?
Bigger.
Gridfire?

Posted: 2003-02-15 04:47am
by Enlightenment
XaLEv wrote:Gridfire?
It's a real-world thing. Probably bigger (in terms of size, not power) than a Gridfire incursion, though.

Posted: 2003-02-15 12:11pm
by Alyrium Denryle
Big bang?, or a galaxy exploding?

Posted: 2003-02-15 02:34pm
by Enlightenment
Alyrium Denryle wrote:Big bang?, or a galaxy exploding?
Exploding galaxy.

Here's your cookie.

Code: Select all

.sun.com	TRUE	/	FALSE	1767225601	SUN_ID	64.229.11.81:233481019508716
:mrgreen: