Scientists: Utilitarian Hall of Fame

SLAM: debunk creationism, pseudoscience, and superstitions. Discuss logic and morality.

Moderator: Alyrium Denryle

User avatar
Tolya
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1729
Joined: 2003-11-17 01:03pm
Location: Poland

Re: Scientists: Utilitarian Hall of Fame

Post by Tolya »

General Zod wrote:More of an engineer than a scientist, but you have to credit Henry Ford for the refinement of the assembly line concept. Without that we'd have a hard time manufacturing anything on a large scale.
Shouldn't we really give the credit to the founder of the assembly line of the Venetian Arsenal in the 16th century? 16 thousand people could build, fit and launch one gallery a day using standardized parts.
User avatar
General Zod
Never Shuts Up
Posts: 29211
Joined: 2003-11-18 03:08pm
Location: The Clearance Rack
Contact:

Re: Scientists: Utilitarian Hall of Fame

Post by General Zod »

Tolya wrote:
General Zod wrote:More of an engineer than a scientist, but you have to credit Henry Ford for the refinement of the assembly line concept. Without that we'd have a hard time manufacturing anything on a large scale.
Shouldn't we really give the credit to the founder of the assembly line of the Venetian Arsenal in the 16th century? 16 thousand people could build, fit and launch one gallery a day using standardized parts.
They might have come up with the basic idea, but I'm not sure that really fits considering the other mentions in this thread.
"It's you Americans. There's something about nipples you hate. If this were Germany, we'd be romping around naked on the stage here."
User avatar
madd0ct0r
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 6259
Joined: 2008-03-14 07:47am

Re: Scientists: Utilitarian Hall of Fame

Post by madd0ct0r »

mmm - they developed it, but it was never taken further at the time, so may not count.


I agree with DarthWong re water treatment - clean water has added as much to life expectancy as the entire development of modern medicine.


in keeping with the theme of utilising advances: Henry Bessemer claims the credit for mass cheap production of steel, leading to the other half of the industrial revolution.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bessemer_process


Brunel did pretty well in a number of fields.


Finally, as a wild card, The Cadbury family for bringing chocolate and decent living standards to the British masses.
"Aid, trade, green technology and peace." - Hans Rosling.
"Welcome to SDN, where we can't see the forest because walking into trees repeatedly feels good, bro." - Mr Coffee
User avatar
Winston Blake
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2529
Joined: 2004-03-26 01:58am
Location: Australia

Re: Scientists: Utilitarian Hall of Fame

Post by Winston Blake »

And now for something completely different: the development of public key cryptography made cheap, widespread secure communications possible. Without it, commercial use of the internet (and of telecommunications in general) would not have taken off in the 90s.

The fundamentals were invented by Whitfield Diffie, Martin Hellman and Ralph Merkle. Previously, the consensus opinion of centuries of cryptography was that it was impossible to share a secret (message) without already sharing a secret (key). The U.S. government spent vast amounts of money on securely transporting and distributing actual physical media, holding cryptographic keys, just to maintain everyday operations.

The D-H-M team did the 'impossible', just in time for the computer revolution.
Robert Gilruth to Max Faget on the Apollo program: “Max, we’re going to go back there one day, and when we do, they’re going to find out how tough it is.”
User avatar
sketerpot
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1723
Joined: 2004-03-06 12:40pm
Location: San Francisco

Re: Scientists: Utilitarian Hall of Fame

Post by sketerpot »

Fritz Haber and Carl Bosch, who invented the Haber-Bosch process for synthesizing ammonia from nitrogen in the air on an industrial scale. It was a brilliant combination of science and engineering, and it's had quite an impact on the world: without the fertilizer produced with the Haber-Bosch process, billions of people would starve.
Post Reply