On Manned Turrets

PSW: discuss Star Wars without "versus" arguments.

Moderator: Vympel

jollyreaper
Jedi Master
Posts: 1127
Joined: 2010-06-28 10:19pm

Re: On Manned Turrets

Post by jollyreaper »

hunter5 wrote:I have heard from many EU sources that AI just isn't as good in combat as a biological operator. This seem to be a good enough explanation on why they don't use auto turrents
That would really be a good explanation for trained Jedi vs. droids. Jedi can see into the future and predict an opponent's next action, something droids simply cannot do. Against a bog-standard human they'd be fast enough but they can't be faster than precognition.

If everybody operated under a certain level of latent force sensitivity, this could explain the natural superiority of organics versus machines. But they don't so machines should win out.

We know the real explanation for why we see manned guns -- they were emulating WWII combat footage. And even after we developed automated guns for warships we know the artistic reason to keep humans in there. But it doesn't make a whole lot of sense. Why do we never see the equivalent of cruise missiles in the Star Wars universe? If they have sufficient tech to make droids then they should have sufficient tech to make good cruise missiles. In real life the realization was that firing a bunch of missiles with individually low probabilities of hitting against well-defended targets was preferable to sending highly-trained combat pilots into that same meat grinder. Conventional attack against well-defended targets is suicide.
User avatar
Bakustra
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2822
Joined: 2005-05-12 07:56pm
Location: Neptune Violon Tide!

Re: On Manned Turrets

Post by Bakustra »

jollyreaper wrote:
hunter5 wrote:I have heard from many EU sources that AI just isn't as good in combat as a biological operator. This seem to be a good enough explanation on why they don't use auto turrents
That would really be a good explanation for trained Jedi vs. droids. Jedi can see into the future and predict an opponent's next action, something droids simply cannot do. Against a bog-standard human they'd be fast enough but they can't be faster than precognition.

If everybody operated under a certain level of latent force sensitivity, this could explain the natural superiority of organics versus machines. But they don't so machines should win out.

We know the real explanation for why we see manned guns -- they were emulating WWII combat footage. And even after we developed automated guns for warships we know the artistic reason to keep humans in there. But it doesn't make a whole lot of sense. Why do we never see the equivalent of cruise missiles in the Star Wars universe? If they have sufficient tech to make droids then they should have sufficient tech to make good cruise missiles. In real life the realization was that firing a bunch of missiles with individually low probabilities of hitting against well-defended targets was preferable to sending highly-trained combat pilots into that same meat grinder. Conventional attack against well-defended targets is suicide.
How do you know that people don't all operate under a certain level of Force-sensitivity? The presence of Force-blind species such as the Ssi-Ruuk or Yuuzhan Vong show that everybody normally has a connection to the force. The description of midi-chlorians as universal to life and related to the Force say that everything is connected to the Force. Every philosopher upon the Force speaks of its universality. This is a common Star Wars-related meme, but it's not really supported by the films or the EU.
Invited by the new age, the elegant Sailor Neptune!
I mean, how often am I to enter a game of riddles with the author, where they challenge me with some strange and confusing and distracting device, and I'm supposed to unravel it and go "I SEE WHAT YOU DID THERE" and take great personal satisfaction and pride in our mutual cleverness?
- The Handle, from the TVTropes Forums
jollyreaper
Jedi Master
Posts: 1127
Joined: 2010-06-28 10:19pm

Re: On Manned Turrets

Post by jollyreaper »

I make the assumption because non-jedi are portrayed as pretty much like us. If we consider force=magic, there are fantasy setting where wizards are rare and the only magic users and there are settings where magic is an everyday thing with housewives using minor spells of preserving when canning vegetables and the men using healing spells on the livestock ranging all the way up the scale to the usual wizards and nasties. There's no indication that the Force is a part of everyone's life, even though everyone contributes with a bit of their life energy. It's probably no different from breathing -- I'm taking part in the carbon cycle without being aware of it and even when I do become aware, it's not like I suddenly have mad powerz. Luke can tell Han about the Force but if he doesn't have the knack, he's not getting anywhere. I hate the midichlorian explanation and much prefer it to something like higher math -- anyone could learn it, theoretically, but very few will be any good at it. I hate the Force being a genetic birthright thing.
User avatar
Bakustra
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2822
Joined: 2005-05-12 07:56pm
Location: Neptune Violon Tide!

Re: On Manned Turrets

Post by Bakustra »

jollyreaper wrote:I make the assumption because non-jedi are portrayed as pretty much like us. If we consider force=magic, there are fantasy setting where wizards are rare and the only magic users and there are settings where magic is an everyday thing with housewives using minor spells of preserving when canning vegetables and the men using healing spells on the livestock ranging all the way up the scale to the usual wizards and nasties. There's no indication that the Force is a part of everyone's life, even though everyone contributes with a bit of their life energy. It's probably no different from breathing -- I'm taking part in the carbon cycle without being aware of it and even when I do become aware, it's not like I suddenly have mad powerz. Luke can tell Han about the Force but if he doesn't have the knack, he's not getting anywhere. I hate the midichlorian explanation and much prefer it to something like higher math -- anyone could learn it, theoretically, but very few will be any good at it. I hate the Force being a genetic birthright thing.
How do you know? Without training, somebody strong in the force merely has excellent reflexes. Consider that Leia didn't appear to have any supernatural abilities, and yet Yoda and Obi-Wan considered her their second hope. The same for Luke, at least overtly. Meanwhile, every description of the Force indicates that it is universal and everything is connected to it. When midichlorians rear their pseudopoda, Qui-Gon says that everybody has them. There's really nothing that outright says that only a few people can draw upon the Force. People assume it because there are so few Jedi, but on the other hand, the Jedi probably only take the best. It's quite possible that Han could, if trained, be able to use the Force on a limited basis. But his strength/sensitivity might well limit him to small-scale stuff. Note that Vader says "the Force is strong with this one" not "this can call upon the Force".

If you don't like the genetic theory, then discard it! It's never explicit, and poorly implied anyways. I see no reason to hold onto it, when there are alternative theories like this one or the "will of the Force" model.
Invited by the new age, the elegant Sailor Neptune!
I mean, how often am I to enter a game of riddles with the author, where they challenge me with some strange and confusing and distracting device, and I'm supposed to unravel it and go "I SEE WHAT YOU DID THERE" and take great personal satisfaction and pride in our mutual cleverness?
- The Handle, from the TVTropes Forums
Adam Reynolds
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2354
Joined: 2004-03-27 04:51am

Re: On Manned Turrets

Post by Adam Reynolds »

Bakustra wrote: How do you know? Without training, somebody strong in the force merely has excellent reflexes. Consider that Leia didn't appear to have any supernatural abilities, and yet Yoda and Obi-Wan considered her their second hope. The same for Luke, at least overtly. Meanwhile, every description of the Force indicates that it is universal and everything is connected to it. When midichlorians rear their pseudopoda, Qui-Gon says that everybody has them. There's really nothing that outright says that only a few people can draw upon the Force. People assume it because there are so few Jedi, but on the other hand, the Jedi probably only take the best. It's quite possible that Han could, if trained, be able to use the Force on a limited basis. But his strength/sensitivity might well limit him to small-scale stuff. Note that Vader says "the Force is strong with this one" not "this can call upon the Force".
This fits with the character of Scout from the novel Dark Rendezvous. She was rather weak in her force abilities and only became a Jedi by the fluke of having been chosen despite her weakness and her raw determination that impressed Yoda.
Bakustra wrote:If you don't like the genetic theory, then discard it! It's never explicit, and poorly implied anyways. I see no reason to hold onto it, when there are alternative theories like this one or the "will of the Force" model.
The primary evidence for the genetic theory is that most children of Force sensitives seem to inherit this trait. There is even the Halcyon line that is weak in Telekinesis. Are there any cases of children of Force sensitives without Force sensitivity?
User avatar
Cykeisme
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2416
Joined: 2004-12-25 01:47pm
Contact:

Re: On Manned Turrets

Post by Cykeisme »

If Force sensitivity was genetic and/or a guaranteed hereditary trait, virtually every species evolving on every planet in the galaxy would consist almost solely of Force sensitives due to much better handling of selective pressures.
"..history has shown the best defense against heavy cavalry are pikemen, so aircraft should mount lances on their noses and fly in tight squares to fend off bombers". - RedImperator

"ha ha, raping puppies is FUN!" - Johonebesus

"It would just be Unicron with pew pew instead of nom nom". - Vendetta, explaining his justified disinterest in the idea of the movie Allspark affecting the Death Star
User avatar
Metahive
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2795
Joined: 2010-09-02 09:08am
Location: Little Korea in Big Germany

Re: On Manned Turrets

Post by Metahive »

Well, or it might result in ostracization and persecution due to envy and/or fear, limiting the spread of "force-genes".
People at birth are naturally good. Their natures are similar, but their habits make them different from each other.
-Sanzi Jing (Three Character Classic)

Saddam’s crime was so bad we literally spent decades looking for our dropped monocles before we could harumph up the gumption to address it
-User Indigo Jump on Pharyngula

O God, please don't let me die today, tomorrow would be so much better!
-Traditional Spathi morning prayer
SeaTrooper
Youngling
Posts: 126
Joined: 2010-08-31 03:04am
Location: Darwin, Oz

Re: On Manned Turrets

Post by SeaTrooper »

Metahive wrote:Well, or it might result in ostracization and persecution due to envy and/or fear, limiting the spread of "force-genes".
Which would have to be universal, or we would be seeing many more worlds with populations made up entirely of sensitives. Actually, that might even describe Corellia to some degree.

The point being made is that Force sensitivity, with or without Jedi training, provides such a marked advantage that it would simply have to spread among an isolated population. We're not talking about the high-end Force powers, but simply heightened reflexes, unconscious precognition and the apparent personal health benefits of having some access to the Force. At the very least, I would expect sensitives to suffer fewer serious accidents, and remain a viable breeding member of that population for far longer than individuals lacking that extra advantage. The result, even over so biologically brief a period as 20,000 years, should be that everyone has at least some degree of sensivity to the Force.
"Know Enough To Be Afraid" - Transylvania Polygnostic

The Royal Navy has not survived for so long by setting an example for others,
but by making an example of those others...
SeaTrooper
Youngling
Posts: 126
Joined: 2010-08-31 03:04am
Location: Darwin, Oz

Re: On Manned Turrets

Post by SeaTrooper »

jollyreaper wrote:
hunter5 wrote:I have heard from many EU sources that AI just isn't as good in combat as a biological operator. This seem to be a good enough explanation on why they don't use auto turrents
That would really be a good explanation for trained Jedi vs. droids. Jedi can see into the future and predict an opponent's next action, something droids simply cannot do. Against a bog-standard human they'd be fast enough but they can't be faster than precognition.

If everybody operated under a certain level of latent force sensitivity, this could explain the natural superiority of organics versus machines. But they don't so machines should win out.
That sounds like a damn fine idea for some fanfic! SW troopers and jacktars (Imp or Rebel) kicking the stuffing out of PJ-clad redshirts, and the trekkies unable to work out how. :lol:
"Know Enough To Be Afraid" - Transylvania Polygnostic

The Royal Navy has not survived for so long by setting an example for others,
but by making an example of those others...
Post Reply