That would really be a good explanation for trained Jedi vs. droids. Jedi can see into the future and predict an opponent's next action, something droids simply cannot do. Against a bog-standard human they'd be fast enough but they can't be faster than precognition.hunter5 wrote:I have heard from many EU sources that AI just isn't as good in combat as a biological operator. This seem to be a good enough explanation on why they don't use auto turrents
If everybody operated under a certain level of latent force sensitivity, this could explain the natural superiority of organics versus machines. But they don't so machines should win out.
We know the real explanation for why we see manned guns -- they were emulating WWII combat footage. And even after we developed automated guns for warships we know the artistic reason to keep humans in there. But it doesn't make a whole lot of sense. Why do we never see the equivalent of cruise missiles in the Star Wars universe? If they have sufficient tech to make droids then they should have sufficient tech to make good cruise missiles. In real life the realization was that firing a bunch of missiles with individually low probabilities of hitting against well-defended targets was preferable to sending highly-trained combat pilots into that same meat grinder. Conventional attack against well-defended targets is suicide.