StarDestroyer.Net BBS

Q. I’VE SEEN LITERATURE DISTRIBUTED IN PUBLIC SCHOOL THAT SAYS HOMOSEXUALITY IS NORMAL AND HEALTHY. YOU MEAN THAT’S NOT TRUE?

A. Homosexuality is neither normal, nor healthy –It is an unhealthy addiction.

The average male homosexual has over 100 partners in his lifetime. The average lifespan is 42 years. That’s a full 35 years off the natural lifespan of 77 years. We make a big stink about cigarette companies because their product takes from 1-2 years off the average lifespan, yet we give no warnings about homosexuality, and in fact, our present public policy encourages it. If we continue down this road our children will pay the price.

The compassionate thing to do is to say no to a destructive lifestyle, and offer help for those who want to live healthy normal lives. I would offer the same help to a brother who wanted to marry his sister, or a son who wanted to marry his Mother. Love is not the sole determining factor.

We recognize that this is the basis of a healthy society and anything other serves to unravel the fabric of orderly culture

Q. AREN'T WE DISCRIMATING AGAINST HOMOSEXUALS? DOESN’T THAT MAKE HOMOSEXUALS SECOND CLASS CITIZENS? AREN’T THEY ANOTHER MINORITY THAT NEEDS EQUAL RIGHTS?

A. First of all, as a society we discriminate all the time. We say marriage is an institution codified in civil law as the union of two adults of the opposite sex, of a certain minimum age, who are not related by blood. All laws that have conditions are, by definition and necessity, discriminatory.

Secondly, homosexuals are not an oppressed minority. To qualify as a disadvantage minority the courts have already established a three-part test:
1. They must prove that homosexuality is inborn, innate and unchangeable
2. They would have to show that as a group they are economically disadvantaged
3. They would have to demonstrate that they are politically powerless.

Homosexuals fail at all three points There is no such thing as an ex-Puerto Rican, or an ex-African-American, because we can’t change that, but there are thousands upon thousands of ex-gays who have changed their behavior and lifestyle proving, that they weren’t born that way, and that change is possible –with God’s help.

As a group, homosexuals earn higher incomes than minorities, or even the national average. Politically, they have infiltrated all our public institutions and have brought us to a point where we have to consider a Constitutional Amendment to preserve the values that have made us a nation.

They simply are not an oppressed ethnic minority, and it is an offense to legitimate minorities to place a group characterized by deviant behavior in the same class.

If you want to properly place them in a class it would have to be with people who are addicted to destructive behaviors, such as drug addicts, or alcoholics.


Q. YOU DON’T BELIEVE THEY ARE BORN THAT WAY?

A. Let’s be real. My children have brown eyes because I have brown eyes. If homosexuality were genetic they would cease to exist in two generations. Do the math.

We’re all born with genetic propensities toward sin, and self-gratification. It’s the responsibility of a family and a society to help one another overcome those self-destructive inclinations, to help us aspire to our higher nature and thus the society becomes good.

fgalkin wrote:Read this http://www.nychristiancoalition.org/Lib ... 0Chart.htm

Liberalism=Socialism.

Have a very nice day.
-fgalkin

Gil Hamilton wrote:I don't know if that is more offense to liberals or more offensive to conservatives.

Liberal: "Hey that shit isn't true!"
Conservative: "Ah, shit... *points to webpage* I am NOT with him!"

Stormbringer wrote:Problem is all too many conservatives are with them. They pass that same crap off on dumbasses and the willfully ignorant.

What a fucking load shit. I can't believe the garbage on that site.

Gil Hamilton wrote:Well, yes, but I didn't want to be the one that said it because that attacts conservatives to me like an electromagnet being mad about how those nutcases don't represent them (and then turn around and talk about the liberal nutcases do represent the majority of liberals, because people can't resist such hypocrisy).

neoolong wrote:Gah, that was just evil.

Christian Coalition whore wrote:Roberta Combs
President


P.S. Just prior to announcing his firm stand against human cloning, President, George W. Bush, invited me to the White House. He greeted me warmly and told me to tell all of our Coalition members to "keep up the great work." The President understands that we are in the middle of a literal battleground, fighting day and night for all the people of America.

P.P.S. I hope you sense the direction I am taking the Christian Coalition. We must address the political necessities, but we must go forth in the name of Jesus and with the power of the Holy Spirit. We are truly living up to our name as the CHRISTIAN Coalition.

Frank Hipper wrote:
Any questions?

A stupid fundie moron wrote:“What is so bad about a little Socialism?” someone might mutter, “After all, there are some problems that the Federal Government has to fix.”What’s so bad about a little more socialism? That’s like saying,“What’s so bad about a little bit of cancer?”

some sub-sentient fungus wrote:Never mind that the original intent of the Founding Fathers was to have men of wisdom to interpret the principles of Scripture as they apply to contemporary society.

something with the brain power of a sponge wrote:Our modern Supreme Court sees itself as truly supreme. Separation of Church and State simply means, as far as they are concerned, that the Church can’t interfere with what the state wants to do. The State is supreme. The Supreme Court rules over the Church.

A rock wrote:When it comes to Church and State the only intended separation is to allow balance. Each has its own responsibility, function, and authority, and by our system of checks and balances, each one is to serve as a counterbalance to the other....There was never intended to be an absolute wall of separation but rather a bridge of cooperation.

This is why I believe Christians should have their right to vote revoked.

Darksider wrote:

Frank Hipper wrote:
Any questions?

Why was bush elected????

The founders of this great nation intended that we would be “One Nation Under God”

The founders of this great nation came here for the express purpose of establishing one nation under God, according to the Mayflower Compact, which was the first founding document of our history. In this document, signed by the pilgrims as they approached the coast of New England, they stated specifically why they came. They said it was,

Following Christ is not a matter of adhering to a set of rules and regulations or religious ritual. It’s a matter of loving Christ with your whole heart.

So you see, an Atheist or Agnostic has every right to live here, and be afforded all the rights and respect due a human being created in the image of God, but we must never elect them to office or we sentence ourselves to bondage under godless tyranny.