StarDestroyer.Net BBS

Lord Revan wrote:Ofc they don't "mesh well" as they don't agree with him 100%, the thruth of the matter is that you're unlikely to convince to consede even in a minor point, so it's better to try to win the audience to your side then to make him admit defeat (because he won't).

I bring numerous examples,calcs,evidence,I even disproved the Borg wank on that forum,ST wank in general and demonstrated 40k firepower.
Also TM is not cannon,can anyone provide quote of this,to disprove the guy who believes that they are cannon.

Destructionator XIII wrote:Obviously it isn't cannon. A cannon is any piece of artillery that uses gunpowder or other usually explosive-based propellants to launch a projectile. The TNG TM is a book.

Is there a quote that supports that?

Destructionator XIII wrote:Obviously it isn't cannon. A cannon is any piece of artillery that uses gunpowder or other usually explosive-based propellants to launch a projectile. The TNG TM is a book.

Nice sarcasam.

I don't want to create another thread so I post this here(attention,major ST wank).
One guy claimes that ST ships are highly durable since they can stand supernovas and the singularities that allow travel to other levels of existance.
Not related to the link I posted.
I mean where do we see that they are immune to novas and black holes.
He also wanks Genesis device.

A note,he has conceded.