Firefly to ReRun on Science channel.

SF: discuss futuristic sci-fi series, ideas, and crossovers.

Moderator: NecronLord

User avatar
Molyneux
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7186
Joined: 2005-03-04 08:47am
Location: Long Island

Re: Firefly to ReRun on Science channel.

Post by Molyneux »

On the one hand, I hate when networks set up for a specific theme start running astray of that theme - when's the last time MTV actually showed a music video, again? - but on the other...hell, it's Firefly.

I'm a fan of Michio Kaku, in general, and he should be entertaining as well. I already own the series on DVD, but I'll definitely jump at the chance to see it on TV again.
Ceci n'est pas une signature.
User avatar
Losonti Tokash
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2916
Joined: 2004-09-29 03:02pm

Re: Firefly to ReRun on Science channel.

Post by Losonti Tokash »

Sarevok wrote:
Losonti Tokash wrote:Something about uniting electromagnetism and gravity to remove inertia and give ships a kick in the ass so they go faster with less propellant.
That kind of actually explains Firefly verse ships. They are all living space and cargo areas wrapped around huge engines. No giant propellant tanks are to be seen anywhere. Obviously they figured out some way to move ships fast without requiring half the vessels volume to be propellant.
I...would expect that to explain them, since that's the official explanation given.
Swindle1984
Jedi Master
Posts: 1049
Joined: 2008-03-23 02:46pm
Location: Texas

Re: Firefly to ReRun on Science channel.

Post by Swindle1984 »

Cykeisme wrote:
Stofsk wrote:Another one would be the super-system which has dozens of inhabitable/terraformable planets and moons.
I agree, it was a bit jarring when the movie's opening sequence "revealed" that the entire series took place in one incredibly complex solar system.. and the shots of the ship flying away leaving that awesome sparkly trail wasn't FTL.
There was also the fact that the movie ignored a lot of the character development built in the series (Jayne starting to grow a conscience, Mal coming to accept the Tams as part of his crew), but I guess I could accept that the movie needed to be understandable to people who didn't watch the series.
Fucking awesome show, at any rate.

Why was it canceled, again?
As far as I'm concerned, the film is alternate continuity, mainly due to the retconning of character development from the series.

Maybe the science channel can explain how the hybrid conventional firearms/railguns everyone carries work. Or the hovercraft.
Your ad here.
User avatar
Sarevok
The Fearless One
Posts: 10681
Joined: 2002-12-24 07:29am
Location: The Covenants last and final line of defense

Re: Firefly to ReRun on Science channel.

Post by Sarevok »

Technology used to support the hovercraft was implied to exist in the series. Things like flying cars are known to exist on developed central planets. In addition many of the ships seen in the series fly inside an atmosphere in a manner as if they have a SW repulsorlift drive. Consider the Alliance gunship in the episode "Trash" that chased Serenity into a mountain range on a planet. The thing had no visible downward pointing thrusters yet was hovering and moving around like a helicopter.

Or take the protagonists spaceship - the Serenity itself for example. The Firefly class ship don't seem to do vertical takeoff/landing or hovering on raw engine thrust alone. In real world exhaust from a vertical take off jet aircraft is insanely hot and damaging. The F-35 and V-22 Osprey are having serious problems because their exhaust can melt the deck of ships while landing or hovering above them.

You don't see such destructive engine exhaust from the Serenity implying the engines are not producing enough thrust to support the entire weight of the ship. There is probably similar anti gravity tech work here to reduce the apparent mass of the ship.

Which incidentally ties into the earlier discussion about Firefly verse ships having inertia manipulation tech that lets engine do more with less thrust.
I wrote earlier in response to Losonti wrote:That kind of actually explains Firefly verse ships. They are all living space and cargo areas wrapped around huge engines. No giant propellant tanks are to be seen anywhere. Obviously they figured out some way to move ships fast without requiring half the vessels volume to be propellant.
I have to tell you something everything I wrote above is a lie.
User avatar
Aaron
Blackpowder Man
Posts: 12031
Joined: 2004-01-28 11:02pm
Location: British Columbian ExPat

Re: It's official, they're bringing Firefly back!!!!

Post by Aaron »

spaceviking wrote:
Stofsk wrote:Thread title is misleading. I was expecting to see news of a revival or a new series or something.
Would you really want firefly the next generation?
Honestly, I think it's best to leave it were it died. It was a fantastic show and I enjoyed it immensely but I could already see that River stories were going to dominate and the adventures of a barefoot fucked up teenager don't interest me that much.
M1891/30: A bad day on the range is better then a good day at work.
Image
User avatar
Stofsk
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 12925
Joined: 2003-11-10 12:36am

Re: It's official, they're bringing Firefly back!!!!

Post by Stofsk »

spaceviking wrote:
Stofsk wrote:Thread title is misleading. I was expecting to see news of a revival or a new series or something.
Would you really want firefly the next generation?
Image
Image
User avatar
Aaron
Blackpowder Man
Posts: 12031
Joined: 2004-01-28 11:02pm
Location: British Columbian ExPat

Re: Firefly to ReRun on Science channel.

Post by Aaron »

Heroine of "Dikkstown" eh?
M1891/30: A bad day on the range is better then a good day at work.
Image
User avatar
Batman
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 16432
Joined: 2002-07-09 04:51am
Location: Seriously thinking about moving to Marvel because so much of the DCEU stinks

Re: Firefly to ReRun on Science channel.

Post by Batman »

.
..
...
Okay, that was just wrong on so many levels.
'Next time I let Superman take charge, just hit me. Real hard.'
'You're a princess from a society of immortal warriors. I'm a rich kid with issues. Lots of issues.'
'No. No dating for the Batman. It might cut into your brooding time.'
'Tactically we have multiple objectives. So we need to split into teams.'-'Dibs on the Amazon!'
'Hey, we both have a Martian's phone number on our speed dial. I think I deserve the benefit of the doubt.'
'You know, for a guy with like 50 different kinds of vision, you sure are blind.'
User avatar
Molyneux
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7186
Joined: 2005-03-04 08:47am
Location: Long Island

Re: Firefly to ReRun on Science channel.

Post by Molyneux »

Batman wrote:.
..
...
Okay, that was just wrong on so many levels.
I don't know...Whil Wheaton with no shirt on sounds like he might be a decent draw to me.
Ceci n'est pas une signature.
Post Reply