Sea Skimmer wrote:Due to the Nazis trying to insist the war was going well they didn’t go nearly as far as some other European powers did to remove artifacts to safety, Britain moved stuff from London to Scotland for example, until after several Berlin museums were hit in air raids. A fair bit of stuff was destroyed by fire in 1943 when the raids on Berlin became heavy for the first time. That’s probably why the stuff was hastily thrown inside valuable flak tower shelter space instead of being removed to the countryside as would make sense given the time and labor, and a not disrupted railway system to do it. It is impressive what was done to protect some European statues that couldn't easily be moved though, like sandbag piles several stories tall around this statue of King Charles I in Trafalgar square.
Yeah, tell me about it. Like nearly everything the Nazis did, it was not a perfect or even particularly good system. The preservation of culture was jumpstarted after the destruction of Hamburg though and generally, it managed to save most of the valuable artifacts.
I do believe it is illegal in Russia to return anything to Germany not already returned; I doubt that will change anytime soon.
Yes. Sadly, a lot of bad blood over this. To be honest, I do not care that much if it is now on display in Russia or Germany, but what matters to me is that this stuff is currently inaccessible to historians and may have already (or currently is) taking irreperable damage due to improper storage.
They also may simply have misplaced some of that stuff in the depths of Siberia and would rather not admit it.
No, that is not my belief. The Soviets organized this one loot very carefully and relegated a lot of resources to it - unlike with others.
Summary. Of course, the matter is how much current Russia has to devote to opening stuff or not...but still, the scale is staggering.
Link.
Whoever says "education does not matter" can try ignorance
------------
A decision must be made in the life of every nation at the very moment when the grasp of the enemy is at its throat. Then, it seems that the only way to survive is to use the means of the enemy, to rest survival upon what is expedient, to look the other way. Well, the answer to that is 'survival as what'? A country isn't a rock. It's not an extension of one's self. It's what it stands for. It's what it stands for when standing for something is the most difficult! -
Chief Judge Haywood
------------
My LPs