Modern weapons required against Space Marine armor?
Moderator: NecronLord
Re: Modern weapons required against Space Marine armor?
There are actually special helmets that accommodate the special senses of Space Wolves.
SoS:NBA GALE Force
"Destiny and fate are for those too weak to forge their own futures. Where we are 'supposed' to be is irrelevent." - Sir Nitram
"The world owes you nothing but painful lessons" - CaptainChewbacca
"The mark of the immature man is that he wants to die nobly for a cause, while the mark of a mature man is that he wants to live humbly for one." - Wilhelm Stekel
"In 1969 it was easier to send a man to the Moon than to have the public accept a homosexual" - Broomstick
Divine Administration - of Gods and Bureaucracy (Worm/Exalted)
"Destiny and fate are for those too weak to forge their own futures. Where we are 'supposed' to be is irrelevent." - Sir Nitram
"The world owes you nothing but painful lessons" - CaptainChewbacca
"The mark of the immature man is that he wants to die nobly for a cause, while the mark of a mature man is that he wants to live humbly for one." - Wilhelm Stekel
"In 1969 it was easier to send a man to the Moon than to have the public accept a homosexual" - Broomstick
Divine Administration - of Gods and Bureaucracy (Worm/Exalted)
Re: Modern weapons required against Space Marine armor?
I thought autocannons were all explosive minus the rocket propelled part. Usually the devastating ones are airship/spaceship grade autocannons where they tear shit up person or vehicle. Any mention of any energy field on that witchhunter or else it's just another stupid author feels like he's ok this time. At the same time assault cannons are treated as absolutely deadly and I thought they had higher rate but desribed as medium calibre, so guess it fits with a 20-30mm modern cannon, where maybe the autocannon is more like a world war 2 era 40mm.
"Somehow I feel, that in the long run, Thanos of Titan came out ahead in this particular deal."
- Connor MacLeod
- Sith Apprentice
- Posts: 14065
- Joined: 2002-08-01 05:03pm
- Contact:
Re: Modern weapons required against Space Marine armor?
Not if you're Graham McNeill.Meest wrote:I thought autocannons were all explosive minus the rocket propelled part.
- Purple
- Sith Acolyte
- Posts: 5233
- Joined: 2010-04-20 08:31am
- Location: In a purple cube orbiting this planet. Hijacking satellites for an internet connection.
Re: Modern weapons required against Space Marine armor?
No, bolters are rocket shots with HE or what ever in them. Autocanons are like regular modern day firearms.
It has become clear to me in the previous days that any attempts at reconciliation and explanation with the community here has failed. I have tried my best. I really have. I pored my heart out trying. But it was all for nothing.
You win. There, I have said it.
Now there is only one thing left to do. Let us see if I can sum up the strength needed to end things once and for all.
You win. There, I have said it.
Now there is only one thing left to do. Let us see if I can sum up the strength needed to end things once and for all.
- Connor MacLeod
- Sith Apprentice
- Posts: 14065
- Joined: 2002-08-01 05:03pm
- Contact:
Re: Modern weapons required against Space Marine armor?
bolters get portrayed as anything from super-sonic grenade launchers to high caliber rocket propelled fragmenting bullets, depending on era, author, and the time of day.
-
- Jedi Master
- Posts: 1049
- Joined: 2008-03-23 02:46pm
- Location: Texas
Re: Modern weapons required against Space Marine armor?
Maybe he got hit with a boulder launched by a trebuchet and broke his neck.KhorneFlakes wrote:Already I want to kill the person who came up with that.Ugolino wrote:Feudal Worlders once managed to kill a Space Marine. A Grey Knight, no less. It was off-screen, but it did happen, implying that primitive weapons are a threat to Marines in sufficient numbers. (Granted, said feudal worlders were mutants and heretics, but the sorcery was explicitly limited to the Allking's own forces, which weren't part of the force which killed the Knight.
Unless the GK didn't have his armor on. Then it makes sense.
But if he did...*inhales*
RRRRAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGGGGGGGGGEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE.
Your ad here.
Re: Modern weapons required against Space Marine armor?
I was thinking about that, and decided the only things on the planet that could penetrate the armour would be the grey knights own stuff.
maybe he was swamped and someone found the grenades?
maybe he was swamped and someone found the grenades?
"Aid, trade, green technology and peace." - Hans Rosling.
"Welcome to SDN, where we can't see the forest because walking into trees repeatedly feels good, bro." - Mr Coffee
"Welcome to SDN, where we can't see the forest because walking into trees repeatedly feels good, bro." - Mr Coffee
- Norade
- Jedi Council Member
- Posts: 2424
- Joined: 2005-09-23 11:33pm
- Location: Kelowna, BC, Canada
- Contact:
Re: Modern weapons required against Space Marine armor?
They could have mobbed him and shoved him down a well or something too.
School requires more work than I remember it taking...
- Ford Prefect
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 8254
- Joined: 2005-05-16 04:08am
- Location: The real number domain
Re: Modern weapons required against Space Marine armor?
Sure, but this isn't quite as amazing as you'd imagine because a) the armour was pretty wrecked afterwards, even if it still worked and b) it's not like the ground is infinitely durable.Tritio wrote:Wasn't a Terminator Space Marine stepped on by a Titan once? And survived?
What is Project Zohar?
Here's to a certain mostly harmless nutcase.
Here's to a certain mostly harmless nutcase.
- HMS Sophia
- Jedi Master
- Posts: 1231
- Joined: 2010-08-22 07:47am
- Location: Watching the levee break
Re: Modern weapons required against Space Marine armor?
I don't remember that. I just remember the... was it a space wolf? getting back up and striding on into battle...Ford Prefect wrote: a) the armour was pretty wrecked afterwards, even if it still worked
Also, wasn't it terminator armour?
"Seriously though, every time I see something like this I think 'Ooo, I'm living in the future'. Unfortunately it increasingly looks like it's going to be a cyberpunkish dystopia, where the poor eat recycled shit and the rich eat the poor." Evilsoup, on the future
StarGazer, an experiment in RPG creation
StarGazer, an experiment in RPG creation
-
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 30165
- Joined: 2009-05-23 07:29pm
Re: Modern weapons required against Space Marine armor?
And yet we do see the Wolves fighting with their helmets on, I believe...Purple wrote:My impression of that was something like this. What you said makes sense, a lot of sense. And therefore it became tactical doctrine for these certain conditions. But as time passed, and I mean time, 10000 years is a lot of time the doctrine became more and more dogmatised like everything else in the empire loosing the original reason and becoming a parody of it self.Simon_Jester wrote:My impression is that Space Wolves fight with helmets off in situations where they value the use of their (unusually keen even by Space Marine standards) senses more than they value the protection and electronics of the helmets.
As in, "fight with helmets off in situations where they value the your senses is greater than they value the protection and electronics of the helmets" became "We are the children of the Rus! Our forfathers fought with their helmets off couze they were cool! Our senses are so strong and we are so uber we don't need helmets."
This space dedicated to Vasily Arkhipov
- Black Admiral
- Jedi Council Member
- Posts: 1870
- Joined: 2003-03-30 05:41pm
- Location: Northwest England
Re: Modern weapons required against Space Marine armor?
The quote from Grey Knights;
The Titan stepping on Terminator quote (AFAIK, what class of Titan it was is never specified);
Simon: Yes, the Wolves fight helmeted just as often as bareheaded. And they're not the only ones who feel that their own senses are better than the armour's autosenses; the White Scars do as well, and a Blood Angels Sergeant in Soul Hunter removes his helmet explicitly because he thinks that autosenses are "no substitute for true perception".
The only details provided there or in the other (very brief) mentions just down the page are that Caanos's body is in one piece (meaning no gross physical trauma), and that the progenoid gland in his throat is intact, meaning no major injuries to there. Other than that, naff all; could've been some kind of poison, a wound to the femoral or brachial arteries, bunch of other possibilities.Alaric checked the runes projected by his autosenses back onto his retina. Dvorn's rune was flickering, he must be injured. "Any men lost?" Alaric voxed.
"Caanos is dead," said Santoro simply. "Mykros is carrying him."
- The Grey Knights Omnibus, pg. 110
The Titan stepping on Terminator quote (AFAIK, what class of Titan it was is never specified);
So, Ford's right, the Wolf Guard dude's armour was pretty badly damaged.He landed badly and cursed as he fell in the rubble, looking back to see Kaarlson slowly lumbering through the ruins. He screamed his name as the mass of the Titan's foot smashed through the building and crashed down upon the Wolf Guard Terminator.
[...]
He looked over towards the flattened building and watched with astonishment as the rubble began to shift and heave. Massive chunks of plascrete and steel were pushed aside as Kaarlson pulled himself free of the debris. His Terminator armour had been gashed open in a dozen different places and his blood was splashed crimson against grey, but he was alive.
- Chapter Approved 2001, pg. 55
Simon: Yes, the Wolves fight helmeted just as often as bareheaded. And they're not the only ones who feel that their own senses are better than the armour's autosenses; the White Scars do as well, and a Blood Angels Sergeant in Soul Hunter removes his helmet explicitly because he thinks that autosenses are "no substitute for true perception".
"I do not say the French cannot come. I only say they cannot come by sea." - Admiral Lord St. Vincent, Royal Navy, during the Napoleonic Wars
"Show me a general who has made no mistakes and you speak of a general who has seldom waged war." - Marshal Turenne, 1641
"Show me a general who has made no mistakes and you speak of a general who has seldom waged war." - Marshal Turenne, 1641
- Ford Prefect
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 8254
- Joined: 2005-05-16 04:08am
- Location: The real number domain
Re: Modern weapons required against Space Marine armor?
Orsai has, as usual, provided the quote. I don't to make it sound like it's not impressive, but it's not as impressive as is regularly touted.barnest2 wrote: I don't remember that. I just remember the... was it a space wolf? getting back up and striding on into battle...
Also, wasn't it terminator armour?
What is Project Zohar?
Here's to a certain mostly harmless nutcase.
Here's to a certain mostly harmless nutcase.
- Connor MacLeod
- Sith Apprentice
- Posts: 14065
- Joined: 2002-08-01 05:03pm
- Contact:
Re: Modern weapons required against Space Marine armor?
It's impressive in the sense that the man survived being pressed into the ground by something that masses some hundreds or thousands of tons. The ground likely had a ton of give in it, but even so, it says something about the durability of Termiantor armor (though considering how "ultra rare/irreplacalbe" its supposed to be, it ought to be tough.) And despite the armor taking a ton of damage, the Space Marine inside was relatively intact and in general alive. Considering the circumstnaces, I call that pretty impressive.
5th edition tends to wank it out far more (basically its better than a Leman Russ and all that.)
5th edition tends to wank it out far more (basically its better than a Leman Russ and all that.)
- Norade
- Jedi Council Member
- Posts: 2424
- Joined: 2005-09-23 11:33pm
- Location: Kelowna, BC, Canada
- Contact:
Re: Modern weapons required against Space Marine armor?
Real people have survived getting run over by cement rollers so it's not that impressive a feat as an isolated incident.
School requires more work than I remember it taking...
- Sea Skimmer
- Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
- Posts: 37390
- Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
- Location: Passchendaele City, HAB
Re: Modern weapons required against Space Marine armor?
The US ran over the M16 rifle, never known for durability let alone with the basic version, with an M60 tank in trials and it came out intact and able to fire except for a bent sight post; crushing is not a very good indication of weapons resistance. Ground pressure can't be anywhere near as high as what a weapons impact, single digit or tens of psi vs. tens of thousands of psi, or else the things wouldn't be able to move on even solid rock without bogging down. Some giant walking mech that turns rock into lava from the pressure of each step sounds a lot like 40K... but I never heard of that claimed. It sure wouldn't make for good life on that pesky dirt stuff.Connor MacLeod wrote:It's impressive in the sense that the man survived being pressed into the ground by something that masses some hundreds or thousands of tons. The ground likely had a ton of give in it, but even so, it says something about the durability of Termiantor armor (though considering how "ultra rare/irreplacalbe" its supposed to be, it ought to be tough.) And despite the armor taking a ton of damage, the Space Marine inside was relatively intact and in general alive. Considering the circumstnaces, I call that pretty impressive.
5th edition tends to wank it out far more (basically its better than a Leman Russ and all that.)
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
- Ahriman238
- Sith Marauder
- Posts: 4854
- Joined: 2011-04-22 11:04pm
- Location: Ocularis Terribus.
Re: Modern weapons required against Space Marine armor?
Try this, in the new anthology Age of Darkness a Terminator takes two krak missiles, the first in the hsoulder spins him around for the second to slam dead-on into his chest. There was a third missile, but now that he was facing the source he was able to bat it away. At this point things get confusing as two squads of devastators open fire from an elevated position, trying to kill the Terminator by simply covering the whole area in missile and heavy-bolter fire. When the dust clears the Terminator is still standing, albeit a bit unsteadily, and his armor is sufficiently pitted and scarred that an SM captain on the ground is able to headshot him where the armor is thin enough for the bolt to penetrate.The US ran over the M16 rifle, never known for durability let alone with the basic version, with an M60 tank in trials and it came out intact and able to fire except for a bent sight post; crushing is not a very good indication of weapons resistance. Ground pressure can't be anywhere near as high as what a weapons impact, single digit or tens of psi vs. tens of thousands of psi, or else the things wouldn't be able to move on even solid rock without bogging down
Though it's said that it took a really good marksman, even for an Astartes to make the shot.
What I'm saying here is that Terminators take some killing.
"Any plan which requires the direct intervention of any deity to work can be assumed to be a very poor one."- Newbiespud
- Norade
- Jedi Council Member
- Posts: 2424
- Joined: 2005-09-23 11:33pm
- Location: Kelowna, BC, Canada
- Contact:
Re: Modern weapons required against Space Marine armor?
I was just thinking of what we could use to hurt them and I came up with modernized Davy Crockett style nuke launchers. Something a bit more accurate than the originals were.
School requires more work than I remember it taking...
Re: Modern weapons required against Space Marine armor?
Just finished the "Call of the Lion" short story in Tales of Heresy, where the Dark Angels were up against what looked like a late 20th century army. Seems like assault rifles are next to useless (although it looked like the DA-commander gets his visor damaged by a lucky shot), but massed missile and artillery barrages were able to took a few Space Marines down. A direct hit from a tank also killed a Space Marine iirc.
-
- Padawan Learner
- Posts: 287
- Joined: 2011-05-29 10:45am
Re: Modern weapons required against Space Marine armor?
Would, say, a couple Javelin missiles do the trick?
I apologize, I'm not too knowledgable on 40K.
I apologize, I'm not too knowledgable on 40K.
- Black Admiral
- Jedi Council Member
- Posts: 1870
- Joined: 2003-03-30 05:41pm
- Location: Northwest England
Re: Modern weapons required against Space Marine armor?
Yes, a Javelin or similar anti-tank missile would most likely be sufficient to kill a Space Marine in standard power armour.; 40k missile launchers have done so repeatedly, see here;ChosenOne54 wrote:Would, say, a couple Javelin missiles do the trick?
Another was struck by a missile fired by an Alpha Legion heavy weapons trooper, the projectile blowing the White Scars into a thousand chunks of smoking armour and burned flesh.
- Hunt For Voldorius, pg. 276
Helicas sent a missile through the doorway, and it exploded in the chest cavity of a warrior in the rust red armour of the Skulltakers*. Bone and armour fragments scythed down the warrior behind him, and the shockwave of the detonation hurled the rest down the stairs.
- The Chapter's Due, pg. 385
A missile lanced out and struck Sergeant Nivaneus, a veteran of the Thracian campaign, disintegrating his upper body in a burst of crimson.
- The Ultramarines Omnibus: Nightbringer, pg. 243
* A Khornate warband formerly of the World Eaters Astartes LegionThe Chaos Marine** proceeded to punch butchering fire into the Vitrian front line. Then he exploded. Headless, armless, his legs and torso rocked for a moment and then fell.
Gaunt nodded his thanks to Trooper Melyr and his missile launcher.
- Gaunt's Ghosts: The Founding, pg. 76
** An Iron Warrior of an unknown warband
There are other examples, doubtless, but those should be sufficient to illustrate the general point.
"I do not say the French cannot come. I only say they cannot come by sea." - Admiral Lord St. Vincent, Royal Navy, during the Napoleonic Wars
"Show me a general who has made no mistakes and you speak of a general who has seldom waged war." - Marshal Turenne, 1641
"Show me a general who has made no mistakes and you speak of a general who has seldom waged war." - Marshal Turenne, 1641
Re: Modern weapons required against Space Marine armor?
Slightly off-topic, but have krak missiles ever taken out Space Marines in Terminator armor? I recall seeing an example from awhile back, but can't remember the exact details. I think it was in one of the Space Wolf novels.
'Ai! ai!' wailed Legolas. 'A Balrog! A Balrog is come!'
Gimli stared with wide eyes. 'Durin's Bane!' he cried, and letting his axe fall he covered his face.
'A Balrog,' muttered Gandalf. 'Now I understand.' He faltered and leaned heavily on his staff. 'What an evil fortune! And I am already weary.'
- J.R.R Tolkien, The Fellowship of the Ring
Gimli stared with wide eyes. 'Durin's Bane!' he cried, and letting his axe fall he covered his face.
'A Balrog,' muttered Gandalf. 'Now I understand.' He faltered and leaned heavily on his staff. 'What an evil fortune! And I am already weary.'
- J.R.R Tolkien, The Fellowship of the Ring
- Black Admiral
- Jedi Council Member
- Posts: 1870
- Joined: 2003-03-30 05:41pm
- Location: Northwest England
Re: Modern weapons required against Space Marine armor?
The one example of a krak missile v. Terminator armour from the Space Wolf series is this;
The krak missile struck the Space Marine full in the chest, knocking him back a step, but the anti-tank round could not penetrate the adamantine breastplate of the ancient Terminator suit.
- Space Wolf: The Second Omnibus, pg. 519
"I do not say the French cannot come. I only say they cannot come by sea." - Admiral Lord St. Vincent, Royal Navy, during the Napoleonic Wars
"Show me a general who has made no mistakes and you speak of a general who has seldom waged war." - Marshal Turenne, 1641
"Show me a general who has made no mistakes and you speak of a general who has seldom waged war." - Marshal Turenne, 1641
Re: Modern weapons required against Space Marine armor?
Addendum, in Fallen Angels (HH), there's mention that while las bolts failed to penetrate Nemiel's space marine armor, its integrity fields got lowered, so it looks like armor overall effectivensess can be lowered with sustained fire.wautd wrote:In the Space Wolves short story in Tales of Heresy (HH), there's mention of a squad armor damage ranging between 10 to 18%. But I guess this might as well point to a disabled helmet or ripped off shoulder pad or something. I just found it weird to add a percentage to it.Connor MacLeod wrote:One thing to remember about armor is that it's not simple like it is in an RPG (Eg not "hit points" or "damage resistance" or stuff like that.)
(unless Dark Eldar have some kind of funky weapon that lowers armor integrity).
Re: Modern weapons required against Space Marine armor?
Space marine armor should be penetrated by AP .50cal rounds or 40mm grenades (bolter rounds are essentially rocket-propelled 20mm grenades so a 40mm grenade should do something) maybe a sniper armed with a Barrett could do it (A Barrett using armor-piercing rounds could penetrate a few feet of concrete or go through an armored car and come out the other side, also .50cal rounds will tear a man in half and send one half flying into the air) If this fails 25mm autocannon rounds should be able to do it, and if this fails a few RPGs should definitely be able to do it. Terminators on the other hand will definitely require armor-piercing autocannon rounds or 120mm HEAT rounds should put a terminator down for good just leaving a bloody mess.