Page 2 of 103

Re: Star Wars: Rebels

Posted: 2014-04-26 04:54pm
by DesertFly
Looks like The Clone Wars: The Next Generation to me.

EDIT - As in, I think it looks just as good.

Re: Star Wars: Rebels

Posted: 2014-04-26 05:12pm
by Irbis
RogueIce wrote:I have seen some other concept art that looks like it could be Imperial Army here. They do have vaguely ST-ish masks, but the rest of the uniform and armor looks like the Imperial Army. And I think that'll be awesome to see, because honestly outside of Timothy Zahn and the Empire/Rebellion comics (and RPG sources), I don't think the EU has ever really used them or even made the distinction, just went with All Stormtroopers All The Time. So seeing the Army proper show up in T-canon will be sweet.
That's the big problem with this series. It looks like every single Imperial (save for one Sith wannabe) will be completely faceless mook waiting to be killed, like NPCs in console game. Complete with teenage heroes keeping high scores. *sigh* I really hope writers can avoid that.

Re: Star Wars: Rebels

Posted: 2014-04-27 07:21am
by NecronLord
Irbis wrote:
RogueIce wrote:I have seen some other concept art that looks like it could be Imperial Army here. They do have vaguely ST-ish masks, but the rest of the uniform and armor looks like the Imperial Army. And I think that'll be awesome to see, because honestly outside of Timothy Zahn and the Empire/Rebellion comics (and RPG sources), I don't think the EU has ever really used them or even made the distinction, just went with All Stormtroopers All The Time. So seeing the Army proper show up in T-canon will be sweet.
That's the big problem with this series. It looks like every single Imperial (save for one Sith wannabe) will be completely faceless mook waiting to be killed, like NPCs in console game. Complete with teenage heroes keeping high scores. *sigh* I really hope writers can avoid that.
So... like the OT then?

Re: Star Wars: Rebels

Posted: 2014-04-27 08:56am
by ray245
NecronLord wrote: So... like the OT then?
Just because it is in the OT doesn't necessarily mean it is a good thing.

Re: Star Wars: Rebels

Posted: 2014-04-27 09:25am
by Irbis
NecronLord wrote:So... like the OT then?
In OT, we didn't have Sith emo wannabes, computer-games grade protagonists, and most imperials actually had faces fully visible outside of stormtroopers and TIE pilots. Hell, look at the vehicle driver concept on first page, it's just stormtrooper faceplate welded to what was completely open helmet in TOT:

Image

Besides, times changed a bit since 80s, and the standards were raised in the meantime.

Re: Star Wars: Rebels

Posted: 2014-04-27 04:56pm
by RogueIce
Thanas wrote:Not that great.
The animation style for the characters id definitely less blocky than TCW, which this shows pretty well.

Other than that I agree that as a teaser it's pretty meh. Little action sequence that will work fine in an episode, probably, but as a standalone is really nothing special.
Irbis wrote:That's the big problem with this series. It looks like every single Imperial (save for one Sith wannabe) will be completely faceless mook waiting to be killed, like NPCs in console game. Complete with teenage heroes keeping high scores. *sigh* I really hope writers can avoid that.
To be fair, the obvious practical reason for that is they'd have to make unique faces for all of those soldiers, which I'd imagine is probably more expensive than they'd want to do, assuming those guys show up a lot.

But since it seems I was wrong (maybe, I only vaguely recall reading this somewhere now) and those were basically "stormtrooper vehicle pilots" it seems there won't be a distinct Imperial Army in this show.

Which makes me sad. :(

Re: Star Wars: Rebels

Posted: 2014-04-28 05:31am
by Irbis
RogueIce wrote:To be fair, the obvious practical reason for that is they'd have to make unique faces for all of those soldiers, which I'd imagine is probably more expensive than they'd want to do, assuming those guys show up a lot.
I don't know, would anyone notice they had similar faces if the goggles on image above were on their eyes? I still think it has more to do with dehumanizing the opponents on kid show than any technical difficulties, I didn't do any 3D modelling in years but changing proportions a bit in finished model to make face look different was a job that took closer to seconds, not days.

Re: Star Wars: Rebels

Posted: 2014-04-28 06:09pm
by RogueIce
Irbis wrote:
RogueIce wrote:To be fair, the obvious practical reason for that is they'd have to make unique faces for all of those soldiers, which I'd imagine is probably more expensive than they'd want to do, assuming those guys show up a lot.
I don't know, would anyone notice they had similar faces if the goggles on image above were on their eyes? I still think it has more to do with dehumanizing the opponents on kid show than any technical difficulties, I didn't do any 3D modelling in years but changing proportions a bit in finished model to make face look different was a job that took closer to seconds, not days.
Possibly. I won't deny that probably plays a role, though TCW got away with killing people who had faces. Maybe because most of those were actually nonhuman faces, if memory serves?

Oh crap, Filoni has a canon anti-alien bias! :shock:

:razz:

But anyway, they are supposedly "stormtrooper something-something" so I guess it makes sense to have that aesthetic. I think they're meant to be vehicle operators? But if that were the case I'd give them those white TIE pilot helmets the AT-AT drivers had in ESB. It makes no sense to use the Army helmet (Veers, the AT-ST drivers in RotJ) with a stormtrooper face plate.

But I guess we'll see whenever they make an appearance in the show.

Re: Star Wars: Rebels

Posted: 2014-04-29 06:00am
by Irbis
RogueIce wrote:But anyway, they are supposedly "stormtrooper something-something" so I guess it makes sense to have that aesthetic. I think they're meant to be vehicle operators? But if that were the case I'd give them those white TIE pilot helmets the AT-AT drivers had in ESB. It makes no sense to use the Army helmet (Veers, the AT-ST drivers in RotJ) with a stormtrooper face plate.
Yeah, that's exactly it. We already have 'stormtrooper drivers' in these guys:

Image

So why try to reinvent the wheel? Is Empire non canon now too?

Oh well, I guess it's wait and see until then.

Re: Star Wars: Rebels

Posted: 2014-05-04 04:37am
by Dartzap

Re: Star Wars: Rebels

Posted: 2014-05-04 07:03am
by Irbis
The plastic hair, pink Hello Kitty mandalorian teenager, low detail ISD and comic relief stormtroopers are... :wtf:

Other highlights: emo Sith is back, not sure about the officer helmet, too. *sigh*

Re: Star Wars: Rebels

Posted: 2014-05-04 09:40am
by Darksider
Irbis wrote:The plastic hair, pink Hello Kitty mandalorian teenager, low detail ISD and comic relief stormtroopers are... :wtf:

Other highlights: emo Sith is back, not sure about the officer helmet, too. *sigh*

My anticipation for this series is beginning to dissipate.

Re: Star Wars: Rebels

Posted: 2014-05-04 11:02am
by Thanas
The trailer wasn't that bad, I found it to be an improvement over the previous one.

Also: correct link for those not using mobile.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_soLH5MWGOg

Re: Star Wars: Rebels

Posted: 2014-05-04 11:19am
by Darksider
Hm. I can make out at least one Stormtrooper getting killed in that trailer, so at least my worst fear for the series isn't coming to pass.

Re: Star Wars: Rebels

Posted: 2014-05-04 05:15pm
by RogueIce
I didn't see any comic-relief stormtroopers. Are you talking about the one who looked at the detonator? :?

Re: Star Wars: Rebels

Posted: 2014-05-07 10:08pm
by DarthPooky
My only Concern is that they don't go with the brain bug that storm troopers are completely inaccurate and can't hit a thing Otherwise I'm really looking forward to it and the Animation themes better than In the clone wars Even a bit.

Re: Star Wars: Rebels

Posted: 2014-05-07 10:10pm
by Darksider
DarthPooky wrote:My only Concern is that they don't go with the brain bug that storm troopers are completely inaccurate and can't hit a thing Otherwise I'm really looking forward to it and the Animation themes better than In the clone wars Even a bit.
Given that Dave "Lets have everyone run forward dramatically and fire from the hip like retards" Filloni is involved in the show's production, you can expect an extremely poor showing from the "Emperor's Finest."

I'm slightly desensitized to it because i've been watching TCW for six years, but it's still fucking annoying sometimes.

Re: Star Wars: Rebels

Posted: 2014-05-08 08:07am
by RogueIce
In TCW, Clones and/or Droids generally had their accuracy and lethality go up based upon whoever was supposed to win that battle, with various mooks on both sides getting knocked off for flavor.

So I'd imagine, based on past showings, it's going to depend on how these battles go. If they're only ever fighting against the protagonists it'll be no worse than the OT where they can't hit any of the Big Three, except maybe a wounding shot every now and again for drama. If they go up against some Rebel mooks or whoever, they might get a win.

In TCW they threw even Grievous a bone here and there, showing him as deadly and capable of winning. So I imagine the Empire should get at least a few of those in the series as well.

Re: Star Wars: Rebels

Posted: 2014-06-07 01:57pm
by Arawn Fenn
Darksider wrote:
Irbis wrote:The plastic hair, pink Hello Kitty mandalorian teenager, low detail ISD and comic relief stormtroopers are... :wtf:

Other highlights: emo Sith is back, not sure about the officer helmet, too. *sigh*

My anticipation for this series is beginning to dissipate.
Once people figure out they can use it to bash the PT it will get popular.

This has all happened before.

Re: Star Wars: Rebels

Posted: 2014-06-07 04:41pm
by Adam Reynolds
RogueIce wrote:In TCW, Clones and/or Droids generally had their accuracy and lethality go up based upon whoever was supposed to win that battle, with various mooks on both sides getting knocked off for flavor.

So I'd imagine, based on past showings, it's going to depend on how these battles go. If they're only ever fighting against the protagonists it'll be no worse than the OT where they can't hit any of the Big Three, except maybe a wounding shot every now and again for drama. If they go up against some Rebel mooks or whoever, they might get a win.
The difference there is that in both ANH and ESB, it can be argued that Vader planned for the heroes to escape at least somewhat. Only on Endor did the Stormtroopers really do poorly against the heroes without such a justification and in that case they at least hit Leia.
In TCW they threw even Grievous a bone here and there, showing him as deadly and capable of winning. So I imagine the Empire should get at least a few of those in the series as well.
The issue is that in this era Rebels are supposed to be extremely weak relative to the Empire and in general it is supposed to be a darker era in which the light is all but driven from the galaxy. The Clone Wars were much more evenly matched.

More importantly ANH clearly stated that the Rebel Alliance had won their first true victory, meaning that any characters we see would have to loose most of the time unless they are independent. The Empire should be winning on all fronts during the events of the series.

Re: Star Wars: Rebels

Posted: 2014-06-07 09:01pm
by biostem
Adamskywalker007 wrote:
RogueIce wrote:In TCW, Clones and/or Droids generally had their accuracy and lethality go up based upon whoever was supposed to win that battle, with various mooks on both sides getting knocked off for flavor.

So I'd imagine, based on past showings, it's going to depend on how these battles go. If they're only ever fighting against the protagonists it'll be no worse than the OT where they can't hit any of the Big Three, except maybe a wounding shot every now and again for drama. If they go up against some Rebel mooks or whoever, they might get a win.
The difference there is that in both ANH and ESB, it can be argued that Vader planned for the heroes to escape at least somewhat. Only on Endor did the Stormtroopers really do poorly against the heroes without such a justification and in that case they at least hit Leia.
In TCW they threw even Grievous a bone here and there, showing him as deadly and capable of winning. So I imagine the Empire should get at least a few of those in the series as well.
The issue is that in this era Rebels are supposed to be extremely weak relative to the Empire and in general it is supposed to be a darker era in which the light is all but driven from the galaxy. The Clone Wars were much more evenly matched.

More importantly ANH clearly stated that the Rebel Alliance had won their first true victory, meaning that any characters we see would have to loose most of the time unless they are independent. The Empire should be winning on all fronts during the events of the series.

It could be the case of this group doing well in small encounters, where it's practically one on one - if they are able to take out squadrons of TIEs/Stormtroopers, and take on Star Destroyers, then I'll be disappointed. It should be "They sent 3 TIEs after us - we can handle it. Oh? A Star Destroyer just hyperspaced in and is launching multiple wings of TIEs - get on those hyperspace calcs for an escape route. NOW!!!"

Re: Star Wars: Rebels

Posted: 2014-06-11 12:31am
by Adam Reynolds
biostem wrote:It could be the case of this group doing well in small encounters, where it's practically one on one - if they are able to take out squadrons of TIEs/Stormtroopers, and take on Star Destroyers, then I'll be disappointed. It should be "They sent 3 TIEs after us - we can handle it. Oh? A Star Destroyer just hyperspaced in and is launching multiple wings of TIEs - get on those hyperspace calcs for an escape route. NOW!!!"
I would think so but given some of the battles we saw in The Clone Wars, I'm not exactly hopeful. My guess is that stormtroopers continually shoot at walls and are now put in the comedic role of battle droids. As for capital ships, they will likely fail to hit each other at point blank range (the worst case of this had to be against the Malevolence which is nearly 5km long and was clearly in visual range).

Re: Star Wars: Rebels

Posted: 2014-06-13 06:34pm
by The Romulan Republic
I doubt they'll depict the stormtroopers the way the droids were depicted. Battle droids were used for humour a lot long before The Clone Wars. I'm not sure that's true for stormtroopers.

Re: Star Wars: Rebels

Posted: 2014-06-14 12:25am
by DarthPooky
As for capital ships, they will likely fail to hit each other at point blank range (the worst case of this had to be against the Malevolence which is nearly 5km long and was clearly in visual range).

I was under the impression that the Malevolence's shield's were vary powerful and that the three venerators ware not enough to do the job.

Re: Star Wars: Rebels

Posted: 2014-06-14 04:00pm
by Darksider
The shields of the Malevolence were down, but the three Venators did appear to be hitting with at least one out of every three shots.

Which is still pathetic given the point blank ranges involved. TCW was really just embarrassing when it came to a lot of it's action scenes.