Re: How should the Clone Wars have been Done?
Posted: 2021-09-20 03:27pm
That isn't a plot hole! Logically, soldiers do what the fuck they are ordered to do, and surprise surprise if it means killing the weird ass space monks that for some reason are supposed to lead armies. If you took a SEAL team and put the fucking Dalai Lama in charge, do you really think they would hesitate when the President said "alright knock him off." The plot hole, if anything, is that the clones ever obeyed the Jedi in the first place.Darth Yan wrote: 2021-09-20 02:45pm
It's not "the single biggest mistake". Logically there would have been more clones who defied the order and refused to plug their commanders and the chips addresses that plot hole. The Chips were put in during the cloning process and it's far easier to put chips into clones being grown in secret.
If you do insist that this is a plot hole, you can fix it by saying that there WERE more Jedi who survived the Purge, they were just hunted down afterwards. Easy enough. Doesn't involve absolving low level Nazis of guilt.
I don't think the Jedi would send the clones into meat grinders deliberately, I'm saying that the philosophy of war possessed by the two parties is incompatibly different. Picture this. A platoon patrols a Separatist world with a Jedi, and a child approaches, looking scared. The Jedi calls him forward to rescue him, despite the warnings of the clones that he'll only slow them down. But it doesn't matter--the child is a suicide bomber, pressed into a terrible service in a war that has only brought him death. The Jedi (WHO IS NOT A FUCKING GOD) isn't searching the child's mind for malice, and so doesn't notice until too late. The Jedi survives by the power of the Force, but two clones are killed. The next day, another child approaches; this time, the clones want to shoot him on sight. The Jedi orders otherwise: this war will be won with compassion or not at all. The child is allowed to approach, but the Jedi detects hate in him. Hate alone doesn't mean guilt--he might be unarmed. The Jedi demands a search, but while they're distracted, an ambush is launched. More clones die, but they are victorious. The Jedi has valued the lives of his men and the lives of others, and that has gotten clones killed. A clone commander would have shot both children on sight, and gone by unbothered. This would clearly generate resentment. If you disagree, you are a fool.Also the Jedi DO value the lives of the clones and for the most part (Pong Krell excluded) try to avoid throwing them into the meat grinder. That's going to earn some respect from the clones.
You can have more of the clones WANT to disobey, but be surrounded by men who do. Just like the police battalions, where most of the men followed orders they knew to be monstrous, and very, very few stood up and fought when surrounded by compatriots obedient to the Party. If a hundred clones in a legion decide they won't kill their commander, then they'll die too.Essentially there would have been more clones refusing to just shoot the Jedi unless something like the chip existed.
Also it depends on how large the Jedi were. Going by the prequels there were 10,000 Jedi in a galaxy of billions. Most people would never have met a Jedi, and Palpatine would have spread a misinformation campaign to erase their memory.
And of course, any Jedi that somehow make it out can form the basis of another Clone War. Imperial clones versus the Jedi remnants, this war not mentioned in the history books.
Also, dude. You know you can just quote the part of my post you talk about, right? You don't have to divide it up like I do, but you can delete the irrelevant bits. Cut down the length a little.