Posted: 2003-04-16 08:22pm
Eh, he's a pussy.
Get your fill of sci-fi, science, and mockery of stupid ideas
http://stardestroyer.dyndns-home.com/
This interpretation happens to be outdated and wrong.Ender wrote:It's really simple you fucking retard. As stated in ICS, the bolt is spun. Now look at a spring. Measure it's lenth. Now uncurl it. Measure it's length again. Note that the uncurled length is far greater then the curled length. now imagine that the wire is a road. If you have to drive along it while it is coiled, it will take the tiem it would take to drive the uncurled distance, not the time it would take to drive the curled distance. THAT is how it moves at C and yet doesn't. The photons are traveling in a coiled pattern, not straight line. So they move at C but only travel a straightline distance at far slower speeds.JodoForce wrote: Ah, but your interpretation is wrong, according to the powers that be on this board. According to them, the visible portion of the TL beam is ALSO moving at the speed of light, and IN A STRAIGHT LINE, even though it APPEARS to be moving at sublight speed. Now try to figure that out.
Who knows? Look at his original post; he's edited it SIX FUCKING TIMES. This guy is obviously not interested in playing it straight.Spanky The Dolphin wrote:What do you mean by "+ my take on the war"?
No this is not correct.Ender wrote:It's really simple you fucking retard. As stated in ICS, the bolt is spun. Now look at a spring. Measure it's lenth. Now uncurl it. Measure it's length again. Note that the uncurled length is far greater then the curled length. now imagine that the wire is a road. If you have to drive along it while it is coiled, it will take the tiem it would take to drive the uncurled distance, not the time it would take to drive the curled distance. THAT is how it moves at C and yet doesn't. The photons are traveling in a coiled pattern, not straight line. So they move at C but only travel a straightline distance at far slower speeds.JodoForce wrote: Ah, but your interpretation is wrong, according to the powers that be on this board. According to them, the visible portion of the TL beam is ALSO moving at the speed of light, and IN A STRAIGHT LINE, even though it APPEARS to be moving at sublight speed. Now try to figure that out.
I've only added to my post not deleted, so shut the fuck up.Darth Wong wrote:Who knows? Look at his original post; he's edited it SIX FUCKING TIMES. This guy is obviously not interested in playing it straight.Spanky The Dolphin wrote:What do you mean by "+ my take on the war"?
And we knew this how? You expect us to trust an openly dishonest and stubbornly and foolishly proud debater like you?JodoForce wrote:I've only added to my post not deleted, so shut the fuck up.Darth Wong wrote:Who knows? Look at his original post; he's edited it SIX FUCKING TIMES. This guy is obviously not interested in playing it straight.Spanky The Dolphin wrote:What do you mean by "+ my take on the war"?
Really? So what happened to this rest of this post:JodoForce wrote:I've only added to my post not deleted, so shut the fuck up.
Well?JodoForce wrote:Your saying so does not make it so.
[edited]
You could have set it up as:And all added content other than minor rephrasing are marked as such. If you want it this way, I can make every minor correction on a new post and drive people nuts.
I was talking about the first post.Lord of the Farce wrote:Really? So what happened to this rest of this post:JodoForce wrote:I've only added to my post not deleted, so shut the fuck up.
Well?JodoForce wrote:Your saying so does not make it so.
[edited]
Hey man, you should read MY website! Our theories on on par with one another.JodoForce wrote:deleted