StarDestroyer.Net BBS

XaLEv wrote:http://kier.3dfrontier.com/forums/showt ... adid=35631

EDIT: Deathbringer has oppressed the thread after 4 posts.

And he was damn right to close it.

SB has a different pollicy then SD.net when it comes to flaming (we officialy don't like it).

SB's official stance toward SD.net is "it's not our business. If you don't like it, fine. But do not make it's happenings our business". Translation : pure anti-wong (or anti-darkstar, or anti-kennedy, or what have you) threads have a very short life expectancy over at SB.

Yes, there have been slippups (the infamous Laird post and subsequent thread springs to mind), but the general rule is we as mods try our best to prevent threads devoted to nothing but slamming a particular site/person, expecialy in light of some of the past events (between sb and wong, between sb and b5tech (I think), with another 3d site, sb and ASVS, etc).

You want to see a thread die a quick death? Try making one suggesting an invasion of ASVS. (you might loose the ability to post at SB for a while as well...)

Heh. SB invading ASVS. The ASVS "webmaster" will be spammed with hundreds of E-mails about how the ASVS "interface" (Google news) sucks.

As far as I know no. Not even in the most fevered dreams of the most deluded Trekkie!

Durandal wrote:Heh. SB invading ASVS. The ASVS "webmaster" will be spammed with hundreds of E-mails about how the ASVS "interface" (Google news) sucks.

I can just imagine the invasion stalling after 15 minutes because none of their posts have appeared. Their attention span then expires and their brains explode out their eye sockets irrevocably damaging their computer.

As Lord Wong he chooses the right position which makes it easy to defend. I didn't quote it cause that aint exactly what he said but that pretty much sums it up.