Page 2 of 2
Posted: 2003-07-09 01:31pm
by seanrobertson
YT300000 wrote:
Well, as a TrekBBSer said, she looks like someone beat her up, and starved her for a week.
LOL.
She IS too skinny. I know what you mean.
Alterations required for T'Pol to be attractive:
1. Say she's not a Vulcan. She doesn't act the least bit like one.
2. Get rid of the lipstick. Pink. Uuk.
3. Grow some hair.
On her head, at least
Good ideas, btw.
4. Put her internal organs back in her body. There is no other way to explain her extreme anorexia.
5. Stop wearing catsuits. Wear normal clothes.
6. Don't brag about how the actor is a whore.
7. Magically turn those implants into real breasts.
I do love real breasts, but then, I've never been with a woman who had implants. I'd prefer real ones, but in her catsuit they do look pretty nice.
Of course, big boobs ain't a requirement for absolute beauty. Young goddess Natalie Portman is testament to that.
Thats about it.
I hear ya.
Those are good reasons. A Vulcan wearing a catsuit is...weird. And I'd forgotten all about the "whore" stuff, which is also totally out of character; still, a part of me finds that kinda cool. I always wanted to be with a wild chick

Posted: 2003-07-09 02:14pm
by Peregrin Toker
YT300000 wrote:
2. Get rid of the lipstick. Pink. Uuk.
Yes, why would a Vulcan, of all people, wear lipstick??
4. Put her internal organs back in her body. There is no other way to explain her extreme anorexia.
(bonus for anyone to catch upcoming reference)
I have another explanation: T'Pol is not a vulcan, but an Eldar posing as a Vulcan!
(That would also explain why she doesn't act like a Vulcan.)
Posted: 2003-07-09 02:25pm
by Patrick Ogaard
seanrobertson wrote:
...
Those are good reasons. A Vulcan wearing a catsuit is...weird. And I'd forgotten all about the "whore" stuff, which is also totally out of character; still, a part of me finds that kinda cool. I always wanted to be with a wild chick

There is, ironically enough, actually a flimsy bit of precedent for a female Vulcan wearing a catsuit. There's a little throwaway scene in an early DS9 episode. In it, Jake and Nog, having both apparently just hit puberty, are on the Promenade, doing some peoplewatching. A very well-curved young Vulcan woman walks past the camera, showing off a swaying rear view that the T'Pol catsuit just does not come close to. The boys nearly get whiplash.
Of course, the slightly more elaborate outfits worn by professional Vulcan females on DS9, like the Maquis agent / arms procurer (I'll get the episode at some point) are fairly spiffy. Since all the other ship crew Vulcan outfits from Enterprise seem to be playing off DS9 and TNG precedents, something more professional looking might not be bad.
Oh, and accidentally losing T'Pol and replacing the character with someone less irritating might work, too.
Posted: 2003-07-09 06:49pm
by Jeremy
if she can do that with her eyebrows, what can she do with a ping pong ball?
Posted: 2003-07-09 07:07pm
by Raoul Duke, Jr.
Jeremy wrote:if she can do that with her eyebrows, what can she do with a ping pong ball?
Let's not even contemplate that. And to answer the question in your sig, call him a Borg.
Posted: 2003-07-09 07:09pm
by Raoul Duke, Jr.
Patrick Ogaard wrote:
There is, ironically enough, actually a flimsy bit of precedent for a female Vulcan wearing a catsuit. There's a little throwaway scene in an early DS9 episode. In it, Jake and Nog, having both apparently just hit puberty, are on the Promenade, doing some peoplewatching. A very well-curved young Vulcan woman walks past the camera, showing off a swaying rear view that the T'Pol catsuit just does not come close to. The boys nearly get whiplash.
I have to say that, with a few exceptions, Vulcan chicks are generally pretty hot. Even old T'Pau was probably quite a looker in her day.
Posted: 2003-07-09 07:22pm
by Jeremy
And to answer the question in your sig, call him a Borg.
Amazing... now we know what started the war...
Let's not even contemplate that.
...

well if not her Chekov
Posted: 2003-07-10 01:07am
by Death from the Sea
Jeremy wrote:if she can do that with her eyebrows, what can she do with a ping pong ball?
Hey I have seen some women(*read* strippers) do some crazy shit(*read*shoot/pull them out of their pussy) with ping pong balls,
and bananas,
and pocket change,
and snakes,
and darts.......
Posted: 2003-07-10 08:43am
by Sir Sirius
Raoul Duke, Jr. wrote:Okay, this is the first time I've done a screen cap, so it's probably not the best, and for some reason I can't get WiMP to capitulate and Print the entire image it's displaying (it crops the edges for some reason I can't fucking figure out) but this should do.
Click to see
The Amazing T'Pol Eyebrow Trick!
For those of you who saw it already, you know what I'm talking about. For those who haven't -- sorry; Yahoo is saying my site has exceeded its daily transfer limit. Personally, I think their server gagged at the site of T'Skank.
I finaly succeeded in accessing that page, but while it does show the WiMP frame the actual screen is all black.
Posted: 2003-07-10 09:12am
by Vympel
Same here.
Posted: 2003-07-10 10:23am
by Raoul Duke, Jr.
It worked when I originally posted it as an inline image, but I changed it over because:
1) It was too wide, which I don't like and don't want to inflict on your displays
2) It did an extremely weird thing where the image wasn't static -- it would hover behind the WiMP frame, so that scrolling up and down the page gave the effect of looking at the image through a window, instead of just having the image pasted on the page. I was afraid that extra bit of weirdness would piss off a mod or something, so I changed it to a [url].
I have no idea why it isn't showing what it's supposed to, and I can't get MSPaint to save the captured "PRNT SCRN" output correctly -- it keeps cutting off the top of the image, which sort of negates the point, since that's where the anomaly is.
If any of you have the DiVX, though, it's the scene where she's talking to Archer's floating head. Listen for when she says, "Captain Archer's gone." Freeze it on that frame. Look at her right eyebrow, which is at the top of the screen (she's laying on her left side).
Other than that, I'll try capturing it with PhotoImpact or something, and see if that actually saves and displays what it's supposed to.
Posted: 2003-07-10 11:44am
by Sir Sirius
Raoul Duke, Jr. wrote:If any of you have the DiVX, though, it's the scene where she's talking to Archer's floating head. Listen for when she says, "Captain Archer's gone." Freeze it on that frame. Look at her right eyebrow, which is at the top of the screen (she's laying on her left side).
I just checked that very part like a dozen times and I still can't see anything out of the ordinary with her eyebrow.

Posted: 2003-07-10 12:16pm
by Raoul Duke, Jr.
Sir Sirius wrote:Raoul Duke, Jr. wrote:If any of you have the DiVX, though, it's the scene where she's talking to Archer's floating head. Listen for when she says, "Captain Archer's gone." Freeze it on that frame. Look at her right eyebrow, which is at the top of the screen (she's laying on her left side).
I just checked that very part like a dozen times and I still can't see anything out of the ordinary with her eyebrow.

I don't know what to tell you, then.
I see it, so either I'm seeing things, or you're
not seeing something.

Posted: 2003-07-10 07:16pm
by Jeremy
Death from the sea, you got to hook me up with some of this stuff.

Re: T'Pol's Amazing Eyebrow Trick
Posted: 2003-07-14 03:34am
by Uraniun235
Raoul Duke, Jr. wrote:In "Shockwave, Part 2" (Don't worry, I saw it on DivX, no way I'm supporting B&B through ratings)
The only way anyone supports a show via ratings is if they're "working" for Nielson; hence, we can all blame Nielson Ratings for the state of television today.
Re: T'Pol's Amazing Eyebrow Trick
Posted: 2003-07-14 03:41am
by Admiral Johnason
Uraniun235 wrote:Raoul Duke, Jr. wrote:In "Shockwave, Part 2" (Don't worry, I saw it on DivX, no way I'm supporting B&B through ratings)
The only way anyone supports a show via ratings is if they're "working" for Nielson; hence, we can all blame Nielson Ratings for the state of television today.
No, but it is their fault for TOS going under.