Page 2 of 2

Posted: 2003-07-19 06:38am
by FTeik
Well, who faithfully repeats, what even "serious" media have quoted time and again shouldn´t wonder, if he gets emberassed.

Not only did i have to realize some new things about the nuclear thread of a war after doing a quick research, i also had to realize some worrying facts about Germany´s politics concerning nuclear-powerplants.

Not only are our political tree-huggers almost hysterical about nuclear fission, its scaring how willing the population is to believe them.

But another question:

According to some estimates 80% of earths population and infrastructure are centered at the costs or only hundred kilometers away from the next sea.

So what would cause more death and destruction: To bomb the cities directely or to drop the warheads into the oceans and on vulcanos, creating Tsunamis and earthquakes?

Posted: 2003-07-19 07:16am
by Sea Skimmer
FTeik wrote:
So what would cause more death and destruction: To bomb the cities directely or to drop the warheads into the oceans and on vulcanos, creating Tsunamis and earthquakes?
To hit them directly, a Tsunami or artificial earthquake will only deliver a fraction of the weapons yield to the target.