While heavily upgraded, those A4's where nothing special and an Australian F/A-18 with four Harpoons would be greatly superior for anti shipping, as would many other aircraft in the area. As for fighting Indonesia, there navy is quite small and its air defenses non-existent, you could sink it with Skyraiders.Stuart Mackey wrote: Our A4's formed the best maritime strike units in the asia pacific area and would have been usefull in a scrap with Indonesia/or other nation, but not in a strictly homedefence role. But we would have had to increace the overall size of the airforce at the same time.
Steve Irwin Says: John Howard World's Greatest Leader
Moderators: Alyrium Denryle, Edi, K. A. Pital
- Sea Skimmer
- Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
- Posts: 37390
- Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
- Location: Passchendaele City, HAB
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
- Stuart Mackey
- Drunken Kiwi Editor of the ASVS Press
- Posts: 5946
- Joined: 2002-07-04 12:28am
- Location: New Zealand
- Contact:
True enough, but we had the best pilots. There were plans to put harpoons on the A4's at one point..lack of funding got in the way.Sea Skimmer wrote:While heavily upgraded, those A4's where nothing special and an Australian F/A-18 with four Harpoons would be greatly superior for anti shipping, as would many other aircraft in the area.Stuart Mackey wrote: Our A4's formed the best maritime strike units in the asia pacific area and would have been usefull in a scrap with Indonesia/or other nation, but not in a strictly homedefence role. But we would have had to increace the overall size of the airforce at the same time.
this is true..we were more concerned with their submarines.As for fighting Indonesia, there navy is quite small and its air defenses non-existent, you could sink it with Skyraiders.
As for the entire RNZAF strike arm fiasco..aint funding a bitch?..but dont tell PM Clark this..but about 5 minutes down the road from me, is the Air force museum..its has some flyable combat aircraft {of varying vintages.}..and Ohakea AFB has a usable Tiger Moth.. with bomb racks!!!
Via money Europe could become political in five years" "... the current communities should be completed by a Finance Common Market which would lead us to European economic unity. Only then would ... the mutual commitments make it fairly easy to produce the political union which is the goal"
Jean Omer Marie Gabriel Monnet
--------------
Jean Omer Marie Gabriel Monnet
--------------
-
- SMAKIBBFB
- Posts: 19195
- Joined: 2002-07-28 12:30pm
- Contact:
Yeah. The MV Tampa amongst others.AdmiralKanos wrote:There was also some big scuffle involving a ship full of refugees, as I recall.Glocksman wrote:Isn't Howard the one that rounded up the illegal immigrants and asylum seekers and put them in camps pending hearing their asylum claims or deportation?
If there is one thing John Howard is good for, its getting our military to be the best in the world at Stop and Search at sea missions.
- Sea Skimmer
- Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
- Posts: 37390
- Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
- Location: Passchendaele City, HAB
The limit would be two weapons, and only over a limited range with one drop tank and a pair of Winders. The F/A-18 could haul twice that, or two Harpoons, three drop tanks, and in all cases still be able to carry two Sidewinders and Sparrows. As a third alternative Harpoons could be carried along with Mavericks, Maverick is very good for blowing away small shitty warships. Most version even have a SHIP mod in which it automatically aims for a point below what its locked onto. That way the pilot can easily lock onto the funnel at long range, a big hot target, but get a hull impact.Stuart Mackey wrote:
True enough, but we had the best pilots. There were plans to put harpoons on the A4's at one point..lack of funding got in the way.
Not much of a threat, there mostly immobile waiting for spare parts it seems. and would be likely noticed snorting there way to NZ's shores.this is true..we were more concerned with their submarines.
As for the entire RNZAF strike arm fiasco..aint funding a bitch?..but dont tell PM Clark this..but about 5 minutes down the road from me, is the Air force museum..its has some flyable combat aircraft {of varying vintages.}..and Ohakea AFB has a usable Tiger Moth.. with bomb racks!!![/quote]
I reminded of an event a year or two ago in which your navy got some civilian pilots who owned 50's jet fighters to make passes on its warships so they could conduct AA training.
Course, why you need to use SAS teams for the task I don't know.weemadando wrote: If there is one thing John Howard is good for, its getting our military to be the best in the world at Stop and Search at sea missions.
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
-
- SMAKIBBFB
- Posts: 19195
- Joined: 2002-07-28 12:30pm
- Contact:
Actually the majority of the time its just our Navy doing it. The SAS generally only do the big publicity missions.Sea Skimmer wrote:Course, why you need to use SAS teams for the task I don't know.weemadando wrote: If there is one thing John Howard is good for, its getting our military to be the best in the world at Stop and Search at sea missions.
- Stuart Mackey
- Drunken Kiwi Editor of the ASVS Press
- Posts: 5946
- Joined: 2002-07-04 12:28am
- Location: New Zealand
- Contact:
Hence why we wanted F16's..well air force did, Labour didnt and that was that {never mind some dubious things done by some army officers}Sea Skimmer wrote:The limit would be two weapons, and only over a limited range with one drop tank and a pair of Winders. The F/A-18 could haul twice that, or two Harpoons, three drop tanks, and in all cases still be able to carry two Sidewinders and Sparrows. As a third alternative Harpoons could be carried along with Mavericks, Maverick is very good for blowing away small shitty warships. Most version even have a SHIP mod in which it automatically aims for a point below what its locked onto. That way the pilot can easily lock onto the funnel at long range, a big hot target, but get a hull impact.Stuart Mackey wrote:
True enough, but we had the best pilots. There were plans to put harpoons on the A4's at one point..lack of funding got in the way.
this is true..we were more concerned with their submarines.
Not something you can always assume.During the Timor excursion, HMNZS Te Kaha {or Canturbury? I cant be fucked to look it up at the moment} had a track on one of them, but we didnt know exactly where one other had got to, but we knew it was about.Not much of a threat, there mostly immobile waiting for spare parts it seems. and would be likely noticed snorting there way to NZ's shores.
I know of that and I will tell you an even better story than that, and its true.Sea Skimmer wrote:I reminded of an event a year or two ago in which your navy got some civilian pilots who owned 50's jet fighters to make passes on its warships so they could conduct AA training.Stuart Mackey wrote:As for the entire RNZAF strike arm fiasco..aint funding a bitch?..but dont tell PM Clark this..but about 5 minutes down the road from me, is the Air force museum..its has some flyable combat aircraft {of varying vintages.}..and Ohakea AFB has a usable Tiger Moth.. with bomb racks!!!
When it became known that the strike arm was to effectivly go, Dereck Qiugly, who was on the defence select commitee{and providng various options for the government on defence}, flew the owners of these 50's jets to Wellington for a meeting. In the office he asked these chaps if they would contract to supply the Navy with anti air practice. The jet owners, to a man, told him to "go get fucked" {those words}, they were not going to cover for the governments fuckups and make politcians look good at the expence of their own aircraft.
Via money Europe could become political in five years" "... the current communities should be completed by a Finance Common Market which would lead us to European economic unity. Only then would ... the mutual commitments make it fairly easy to produce the political union which is the goal"
Jean Omer Marie Gabriel Monnet
--------------
Jean Omer Marie Gabriel Monnet
--------------