Posted: 2003-10-31 01:36am
				
				Yeah, it's always a good sign when you find yourself rooting for the bad guys (Ex. Agent Smith)
			Get your fill of sci-fi, science, and mockery of stupid ideas
http://stardestroyer.dyndns-home.com/
Solauren wrote:As to the end of the NJO;
The planet (Zoma Sekot, I know that is spelt wrong) that might be the Vong homeworld will take the Shamed ones and Vong that turn against the Vong hiearcy as it's new citizens and depart
Coruscant will be rebuilt by the GFFA
Shimira will be revealed to be under the control of his Shamed one.
Anakin Solo might be resurrected by Tahiri using Vong cloning and the Lambiant Crystal in his lightsaber (its Crystal Anakin).
I doubts that last part, but I can see it happening to avoid a massive fan fueled assault on Del Ray books
Except for the 'crystal Anakin' part, that, or some variant/permutation seems most likely.Kuja wrote:Solauren wrote:As to the end of the NJO;
The planet (Zoma Sekot, I know that is spelt wrong) that might be the Vong homeworld will take the Shamed ones and Vong that turn against the Vong hiearcy as it's new citizens and depart
Coruscant will be rebuilt by the GFFA
Shimira will be revealed to be under the control of his Shamed one.
Anakin Solo might be resurrected by Tahiri using Vong cloning and the Lambiant Crystal in his lightsaber (its Crystal Anakin).
I doubts that last part, but I can see it happening to avoid a massive fan fueled assault on Del Ray books
..................
That sucks. That REALLY sucks.
Don't worry; I intend to. Probably won't be up until Thursday, maybe even Friday. Why? Because on 11/05, I'm seeing Matrix 3! Ahah!Crown wrote:Anyone want to PM major spoilers and plot points when the finish with the novel? I have a thesis to write up, and I really don't have time to read the book, and I am even less possesed by the inclination.
Why do people keep fucking bringing up Lumiya? She was an obscure character in the old comics and to bring her into the storyline in this way would be UTTER BULLSHIT.Lady Lumiya will show up, Sith the Vong's asses, kill Mara, take Ben and tell Luke 'I promised to spit on your grave when you had lost all hope and all you held dear was taken from you. All you hold dear has been destroyed, and I have your son. Come and climb into your grave"
I beg to differ. Shes not underrated shes right where she belongs, doomed to obscurity in a series of comics that DOES NO EXIST WITHIN THE EU. For Lumiya to exist within the SW universe would be to completely fuck up the established timeline.Solauren wrote:Why is Lumiya brought up?
Force Wielding Babe with Force powers and a LightWHIP
Besides that, she's also the most underated character
Ok genius, maybe you could explain to me why, if Lumiya is not in the EU, she is listed on SW.com under the motherfucking EU section and has her own goddamn entry!Darth Fanboy wrote: Why do people keep fucking bringing up Lumiya? She was an obscure character in the old comics and to bring her into the storyline in this way would be UTTER BULLSHIT.
While we are at it, perhaps a fleet of Nagai and Tofs could arrive to fight the vong too or something? Hmmmm? NO. Fuck that.
So in short, despite Fanboy's unresearched and unsubstantiated assertions to the contrary, Lumiya is indeed apart of the EU. This just goes to show how important research is before making such blatant statements like that.Fans of the old monthly Marvel Star Wars comic will be heartened to know that LucasBooks does indeed consider them part of continuity. Decades of retrospect haven't been kind to all the elements of the comic series, but the characters and events still hold weight and are referenced in newer material whenever possible.

Nice way of completely ignoring my point: "Lets introduce a contradiction, and then I can pretend I'm proven right!" You've been taking lessons from the "I hate the ICS" crowd at Spacebattles, haven't you?Darth Fanboy wrote:Riddle me this then. If Lumiya and the Nagai/Tofs are actually part of the EU, how does this not contradict the early timeline then with Bakura?
Provide proof that the comics are of higher status than the novels (You know what proof is, right?) Last I recall neither source was explicitly higher than another.Addendum: Novels over Comics in terms of Canon Status. The whole bit with Lumiya, the Nagai and Tofs is contradicted by the Truce at Bakura.
Now check this:Lady Lumiya:
According to the Marvel comics, a one-time romatic interest of Luke Skywalker and apprentice to his father succeeded Lord Vader to become Dark Lady of the Sith. Although it is difficult to fit parts of the comic series into the modern STAR WARS continuity, this character has been reintroduced via a Topps card and in a SWRPG article of the STAR WARS Galaxy Magazine. The troublesome peripheral points of continuity surrounding her personal history are left unmentioned, however.
To Accept the Nagai/Tofs/Lumiya storyline, is to discount the Truce at Bakura and that battle with the Ssi Ruuk (since both take place right after the battle of Endor) which factors in later in the timeline, and the conflict from that novel is mentioned in other books.Unification.
Only reject existing material where absolutely necessary. Story elements must have genuine continuity problems to justify discarding them; material shan't be thrown away simply because many people hold it to be repugnant or embarassing. The STAR WARS Holiday Special is a prime example. If a source is uncomfortable or incongruent at face value, it is often possible to add background circumstances to alter its significance and give a more realistic perspective.
Sources should be treated with a view towards unifying everything to give a coherent and concise internal reality to the STAR WARS universe.Wherever phenomena can be explained in several different ways, the theory to be favoured is that which requires the simplest and fewest postulates, and which entails the least ad hoc changes in time. Wherever possible, real physical principles must be applied for the assessment of theories. Common phenomena in technological and natural features of STAR WARS should have common causes.
 Be Sweet.
  Be Sweet.Act like a fucking idiot, and thats what you get.Darth Fanboy wrote:Connor's mad at me, im scared....Oooooooo.....
Wow, errors and conflicts in the EU. How unprecedented (Except for things like Hobbie's existance, Doman Beruss, the supposed scrapping of the Lusankya/Guardian by Mon Mothma etc....)In fairness while Lumiya is part of the official Star Wars Universe, this does address the fundamental problems with her existence in tha tofficial timeline.
http://www.theforce.net/swtc/continuity.html

And so? You're attempting to claim that because a contradiction exists we must toss out Lumiya (and several aspects of the comics) without proving that dismissing said source is in fact the only solution. I doubt you've even made an effort to reconcile them, so quote Saxton to me as if I don't know what I'm talking about (between the two of us, I know which of us is likely to know the proper methodology better.) And even if we admit there are contradictions (which there might be), we address them on an individual basis, which means that only parts may get tossed out (if at all )Now check this:Lady Lumiya:
According to the Marvel comics, a one-time romatic interest of Luke Skywalker and apprentice to his father succeeded Lord Vader to become Dark Lady of the Sith. Although it is difficult to fit parts of the comic series into the modern STAR WARS continuity, this character has been reintroduced via a Topps card and in a SWRPG article of the STAR WARS Galaxy Magazine. The troublesome peripheral points of continuity surrounding her personal history are left unmentioned, however.
Unification.
Only reject existing material where absolutely necessary. Story elements must have genuine continuity problems to justify discarding them; material shan't be thrown away simply because many people hold it to be repugnant or embarassing. The STAR WARS Holiday Special is a prime example. If a source is uncomfortable or incongruent at face value, it is often possible to add background circumstances to alter its significance and give a more realistic perspective.
Sources should be treated with a view towards unifying everything to give a coherent and concise internal reality to the STAR WARS universe.Wherever phenomena can be explained in several different ways, the theory to be favoured is that which requires the simplest and fewest postulates, and which entails the least ad hoc changes in time. Wherever possible, real physical principles must be applied for the assessment of theories. Common phenomena in technological and natural features of STAR WARS should have common causes.
You have yet to provide evidence why we MUST toss it out, since as you just pointed out, dismissal is the LAST RESORT and is done on a case by case basis, not categorically. Again, you demonstrate all the (lack of) logic of the same idiots who want to pretend the AOTC ICS is inconsistent with the canon/official portrayal of the SW universe.To Accept the Nagai/Tofs/Lumiya storyline, is to discount the Truce at Bakura and that battle with the Ssi Ruuk (since both take place right after the battle of Endor) which factors in later in the timeline, and the conflict from that novel is mentioned in other books.

Oh goody, I can't wait. I'll bet its going to be as thorough and accurate as the rest of your research.Before you rail off against my Novels > Comics statement, Im still looking for acceptable proof.
Be Sweet.
 Not that I expect you to find any since I am not aware of any such distinctions aside from the well knonw "primary/secondary canon and official" categories.
  Not that I expect you to find any since I am not aware of any such distinctions aside from the well knonw "primary/secondary canon and official" categories.Hence why I quoted Saxton, timeline cohesion must exist. How can I reconicle THat storyline with the Truce at Bakura if both are supposed to take place Immediately After RoTJ? Its impossible.Wow, errors and conflicts in the EU. How unprecedented (Except for things like Hobbie's existance, Doman Beruss, the supposed scrapping of the Lusankya/Guardian by Mon Mothma etc....)
I like how you admit its "apart" of the universe while trying to make excuses about why your original point shoul still be considered valid even though I proved otherwise.
I repeat again that the issue of errors in the source material have no relevance to the original discussion, and you are simply engaging in a plethora of red herrings (Errors that exist will be dealt with on a case by case basis.)
Granted when I say Novels > Comics Im going on from what ive interpreted here on the board and in other places. I am curious as to whether or not your Novels = Comics interpretation is correct and/or more widely held.On top of that, if we listen to you, then we'd basically ignore what Cerasi said because LFL *obviousy* is too stupid to deal with its own material. Yet these same people determine the fucking policy we employ. Thus, if they say it is part of the continuity it is PART OF THE CONTINUITY, at least in some fashion or another (there is always room for interpretation.)
Thus your opinions hold about as much weight as your usual idiot troll's do.
Hey, I like the AoTC ICS, purdy pictures among other things...You have yet to provide evidence why we MUST toss it out, since as you just pointed out, dismissal is the LAST RESORT and is done on a case by case basis, not categorically. Again, you demonstrate all the (lack of) logic of the same idiots who want to pretend the AOTC ICS is inconsistent with the canon/official portrayal of the SW universe.
 
 I'll admit that Lumiya is in fact an official Character because I had no idea she was given a SWG entry or a topps card. However I still believe that her storylines in the Marvel Comics for the most part are contradictions that cannot be reconicled.And even if there are parts of the Marvel stuff that must be tossed out (debatable, given your utter lack of proof on the issue), this still bears nothing whatsoever on Lumiya and the fact you originally insisted she was not an EU character and then tried to point ot possible contradictions as an excuse to not treat her as one.
Simple Explaination, supported by the Essential Chronology and the Truce at Bakura source bookDarth Fanboy wrote: I have no problems with being wrong, Riddle me this Batman, If there are ways some of these things can be reconciled feel free to point out how they can be. Unlike these trolls and ICS haters you mention id be willing to hear an explanation if you indeed have one.
More Details please.The Entire Lumiya arc takes place over a very short time, like the 2 - 3 months following Bakura, possible during the Ssi-Ruvvi counter offensive (during it would explain why the Nagaki and Tof did so well against the Alliance for a short period)
The Alliance launched a counter offensive, but it only consisted of a few Nebulon-B frigates; it shouldn't have weakened the Alliance.Darth Fanboy wrote:More Details please.The Entire Lumiya arc takes place over a very short time, like the 2 - 3 months following Bakura, possible during the Ssi-Ruvvi counter offensive (during it would explain why the Nagaki and Tof did so well against the Alliance for a short period)
Addendum: Not sure what you mean by Ssi Ruuvi counteroffensive, didn't they leave after Bakura? Then between Bakura and Force Heretic II they only real dealings was a small Alliance Task Force find the Ssi Ruuk completely beaten? (either by the Chiss or whomever) Even with that storyline I am not seeing how the marvel comics can fit into the timeline established by the novels since it seems for the most part that the novelists have forsaken those Marvel comics as parts of the timeline.
The best recommendation I can make on clearing things up is to refer to Timetales on theforce.net. The online version is down, so you'll have to download the zip (if you want, I'll cut and paste the relevant sections for you either here or in a PM)Darth Fanboy wrote:More Details please.The Entire Lumiya arc takes place over a very short time, like the 2 - 3 months following Bakura, possible during the Ssi-Ruvvi counter offensive (during it would explain why the Nagaki and Tof did so well against the Alliance for a short period)
Addendum: Not sure what you mean by Ssi Ruuvi counteroffensive, didn't they leave after Bakura? Then between Bakura and Force Heretic II they only real dealings was a small Alliance Task Force find the Ssi Ruuk completely beaten? (either by the Chiss or whomever) Even with that storyline I am not seeing how the marvel comics can fit into the timeline established by the novels since it seems for the most part that the novelists have forsaken those Marvel comics as parts of the timeline.
Yeah, beaten by what many assume to be the Chiss, though theres no evidence I can remember reading about. Im starting to be more open minded about the time frame, but I dont see the storyline as being able to coexist with the order of events set up by the EU novels and Dark Horse comics.Solauren wrote:However, the quickest fix I can give is simple dating of events
Truce of Bakura: Immediately after Return of the Jedi
X-wing: Rogue Squadron: 2 and a half years after Retun of the Jedi
That's ALOT of room to insert the comics into
Timetales really does a good job with it all. (It even gives the references for where they get the information from, etc)
The Ssi-ruvvi counter offensive is probably an over-statement, they go check out the Ssi-ruvvi empire, which takes time, and find it beaten senseless.
