Posted: 2003-11-06 10:23pm
I always assumed that the fact that they live longer was a natural occurance, rather than a result of some sort of medical technology.
Get your fill of sci-fi, science, and mockery of stupid ideas
http://stardestroyer.dyndns-home.com/
That's not logical. We have present examples of humans rarely living past 100.Spanky The Dolphin wrote:I always assumed that the fact that they live longer was a natural occurance, rather than a result of some sort of medical technology.
Spanky The Dolphin wrote:To assume a species-wide genetic manipulation to both extent life and decellerate the aging process to me seems rather complicated.
Proving my point. Better medical treatment, hygene, and diet is NOT a natural progress of people--what you said indicated that it was the natural biological course of SW humans to live until 150 or so--which is without evidence.Spanky The Dolphin wrote:Humans as a whole right now have longer average lifespans due to improved living conditions and medical advances, even as soon as within the last 100 years. For a species that has been spacefaring for maybe 50,000 years at the least, I don't see how it being a natural process is illogical, since it has fewer variables to rely on.
If they're not blind, deaf, senile, and half-crippled than they're doing better than their real-life equivalents half a century younger. I'd say they're analogous to eighty-something year olds. And again, remember that Bakura is an out-of-the-way colony, and probably outside the sphere of the best medical treatment and such. Look at the anti-aging by modern elites and celebrities. I imagine that galactic elites might live past 200 or so, even going so far as outright genetic life-extension.Spanky The Dolphin wrote:Also, SW humans who have reached and gone past 120 years are often depicted as being increadibly old, which doesn't seem to indicate a decellerated aging process.
A poster on TF.net, Valiento, developed the chronology compensating for later sources and the new prequels with regard to C'boath and Pelleaon.Darth Garden Gnome wrote:*snip*
Yes and he's going to stay dead - To all the fans out there mourning for his death, I have but this to say" Life is shit - get to know that and get over his death - be thankful Ackbar's the only major GFFA figure that dies in the last book.Stormbringer wrote:Any word on what'll happen with Anakin? Is he just still dead?
Well actually, somone does appear to Jacen - or rather, he hears...2000AD wrote:They better keep him dead. I nwas expecting ANakin to appear ghost style (like Yoda, Kenobie and Vader) at the end of the book in front of Jacen or someone.
Its a fucking spolier thread and I already said what you are hinting at on the first page.JME2 wrote:Well actually, somone does appear to Jacen - or rather, he hears...2000AD wrote:They better keep him dead. I nwas expecting ANakin to appear ghost style (like Yoda, Kenobie and Vader) at the end of the book in front of Jacen or someone.
...
But that would be telling and I've already spoiled enough of the book.
Deader then a fucking doorknob.Stormbringer wrote:Any word on what'll happen with Anakin? Is he just still dead?
Thank you, Jacob Marley. I forgot about your revelation on the firt page so please, forgive me.Ender wrote:Deader then a fucking doorknob.Stormbringer wrote:Any word on what'll happen with Anakin? Is he just still dead?
Or that Pellaeon doesn't know, because its his bastard love child? Thats what I think.this book contradicts the last by pelleon saying he never raised children (though he could either be lying to prevent Han & leia from knowing and blaming themselves for his sons death, or he could have been absent in his son's life thus considers it that he never raised him).
So you get upset and the surge of emotion makes a jedi think you are upset it was about the death of your son, but really you didn't even know you had a child?Darth Fanboy wrote:Or that Pellaeon doesn't know, because its his bastard love child? Thats what I think.this book contradicts the last by pelleon saying he never raised children (though he could either be lying to prevent Han & leia from knowing and blaming themselves for his sons death, or he could have been absent in his son's life thus considers it that he never raised him).
A good commander always feel the loss of highly valuable subordinates deeply and I think that is what might have tipped Jaina off. That said I don't think Palleon is lying but rather Jaina confused his tone.Ender wrote:So you get upset and the surge of emotion makes a jedi think you are upset it was about the death of your son, but really you didn't even know you had a child?Darth Fanboy wrote:Or that Pellaeon doesn't know, because its his bastard love child? Thats what I think.this book contradicts the last by pelleon saying he never raised children (though he could either be lying to prevent Han & leia from knowing and blaming themselves for his sons death, or he could have been absent in his son's life thus considers it that he never raised him).
Wait, what if he was his godfather?Arrow Mk84 wrote:Or it could be that Pellaeon simply knew him fairly well. Friends with the family or some such.
Is there such a thing in SW?JME2 wrote:Wait, what if he was his godfather?Arrow Mk84 wrote:Or it could be that Pellaeon simply knew him fairly well. Friends with the family or some such.
Not necessarily, in fact probably not given the scarcity of organized religion but there's nothing to say that he couldn't have some equally close relationship. Certainly friends of the family exist. Look at Chewbacca or Lando, neither related but both were close to the Solo kids.Kuja wrote:Is there such a thing in SW?JME2 wrote:Wait, what if he was his godfather?Arrow Mk84 wrote:Or it could be that Pellaeon simply knew him fairly well. Friends with the family or some such.