Page 2 of 3

Posted: 2004-03-10 01:41am
by Drewcifer
Although I haven't gathered any hard data on this topic, I would guess that men, in general, have the potential to give better blowjobs. We have bigger mouths, longer tongues, and intimate first-hand knowledge of how to get a guy off.

Do we have any bi members that can testify?
Zaia wrote:...waxing poetic about the beauty of having sex while exerting no effort whatsoever.
What are you talking about? Someone has to hold your hair back, there's a little effort involved there :wink: :)

I would have to agree with Dale though, tis better to give than receive. Nothing like getting someone to shimmy and shake at your slightest move. Besides, a BJ is like a quickie or a part of foreplay, at least to me. It's sexual, but necessarily sex. And for that matter, I don't remember the last time I got a BJ -- probably been years -- my last several girlfriends had no interest in giving a BJ and that was cool with me. In the grand scheme of things, BJs figure pretty low on my list. I'm quite touchy-feely when it comes to sex so I doubt I'd just lay there anyhow. I'd keep my special lady friend busy as well :twisted:

Posted: 2004-03-10 01:51am
by Alferd Packer
It's like that old joke:

Guy joins a gentlemen's club, he's getting the tour. They take him into the bathroom wherein stands a barrel with a hole in it at about cock height. Tour guy says, "Just stick your dick in there and you'll get the best head of your life."

They leave, finish the tour, guy comes back, stuffs his cock in the hole, and sure enough, he gets the best head he's ever had. Later on, he catches up with his buddy.

"Did you try it out?" his buddy asked. Guy nods enthusiastically. "Great. See ya on Tuesday."

"Wait, why Tuesday?" The guy asks.

Buddy replies, "Tuesday it's your turn to be in the barrel."


To the topic, though, for me a BJ is more than just wang-mouth action. It's also about eye contact, roaming hands, feeling boobs brushing against your legs. The sum of these events make the BJ a thing of beauty. And switching a dude in to do the duty would kill my boner faster than...well, nothing. That would kill my boner the absolute fastest. :lol:

Posted: 2004-03-10 02:05am
by Cal Wright
Darth Wong wrote:
Ha ha, my use of thinly veiled anal sex innuendo instead of explicit anal sex references is clearly having its desired effect of throwing people off-balance.
Naw, the prospect of getting blown by Zaia kept me off balance from the start. :P

Posted: 2004-03-10 02:13am
by Stofsk
Cal Wright wrote:Naw, the prospect of getting blown by Zaia kept me off balance from the start. :P
[aussie accent]"Tell 'im 'e's dreamin'."[/aussie accent] :lol: :wink:

Posted: 2004-03-10 02:34am
by The Yosemite Bear
fgalkin wrote:
Stofsk wrote:Assuming this is serious I think some men would be able to tell, depending on how good their senses are (they're blindfolded, but they can still hear, so maybe audial cues? Also touch - chicks usually have long hair, well in comparison to guys anyway, so maybe you can feel the girl's hair tickle your thighs while a guy's hair won't - but then, this is a big reach...).
What if you shave their heads bald?

The things you'd do in the name of Science. :D

Have a very nice day.
-fgalkin
well you could always get Bishi guys.....

Posted: 2004-03-10 02:48am
by Kuja
The Yosemite Bear wrote:well you could always get Bishi guys.....
*grin*

Posted: 2004-03-10 03:47am
by Lord Poe
Darth Wong wrote:Actually, I think blowjobs are overrated. While they do feel very good, the feeling of total passivity bothers me. I suppose everyone has a different definition of masculinity in the sex act, but for me it means that I have to take an active role. In order to really enjoy myself, I need to grab ahold of her hips and start driving.
Obviously, you haven't been keeping up with the current porn trend of skull-fucking on websites like "willshegag.com"

Posted: 2004-03-10 04:43am
by Darth Wong
Lord Poe wrote:Obviously, you haven't been keeping up with the current porn trend of skull-fucking on websites like "willshegag.com"
I've seen snippets of that stuff. It tends to have a boner-killing effect on me; I find that it's so openly misogynistic that it kind of makes me nauseous.

Posted: 2004-03-10 04:51am
by Uraniun235
Darth Wong wrote:Ha ha, my use of thinly veiled anal sex innuendo instead of explicit anal sex references is clearly having its desired effect of throwing people off-balance.
Fortunately, I have no fixation with anal sex, and thus the use or omission of references to such cannot faze me! Haha!

Posted: 2004-03-10 05:07am
by Vympel
Lord Poe wrote:Obviously, you haven't been keeping up with the current porn trend of skull-fucking on websites like "willshegag.com"
*shudder*

It's the real bottom-feeding internet porn shit that infects my mailbox everyday- shit like this, that makes me give up hope for the human race. There's probably some ego-maniac ugly fuck giving running commentary during their foul so-called 'porn' to boot.

Posted: 2004-03-10 05:21am
by Lord Poe
Vympel wrote:It's the real bottom-feeding internet porn shit that infects my mailbox everyday- shit like this, that makes me give up hope for the human race. There's probably some ego-maniac ugly fuck giving running commentary during their foul so-called 'porn' to boot.
Lots of this kind of stuff is all over the internet now. I used to love Hustler magazine in the 80's; great porn, funny as hell comics, even interesting articles. Then it got disgusting, with women eating out of dog dishes on a leash, while men piss on the floor next to them, etc.

Now the same shit is happening on the net.

Posted: 2004-03-10 05:24am
by Lord Poe
Darth Wong wrote:I've seen snippets of that stuff. It tends to have a boner-killing effect on me; I find that it's so openly misogynistic that it kind of makes me nauseous.
I know what you mean. I'll never understand how some porn of a woman's face swimming in man juice as she's sprayed by 30 cocks can be arousing. Then there's shit that just makes you shake your head, like guys holding women's eyes open to make sure he can blast a load into them.

Posted: 2004-03-10 05:26am
by haas mark
Though I prolly wouldn't be able to tell the difference, I don't like 'em anyways, so... erm.. yeah.

Posted: 2004-03-10 05:30am
by Sokar
Lord Poe wrote:
Darth Wong wrote:I've seen snippets of that stuff. It tends to have a boner-killing effect on me; I find that it's so openly misogynistic that it kind of makes me nauseous.
I know what you mean. I'll never understand how some porn of a woman's face swimming in man juice as she's sprayed by 30 cocks can be arousing. Then there's shit that just makes you shake your head, like guys holding women's eyes open to make sure he can blast a load into them.
Its simple, nothing is shocking anymore. In order to provoke a reaction the producers keep having to go further and crazier in order to get the same reaction. Bukkake is passe, so now its throat fucking combined with giving her a pair of cream contacts, where the fuck does it stop......

Posted: 2004-03-10 05:46am
by Thinkmarble
Sokar wrote: Its simple, nothing is shocking anymore. In order to provoke a reaction the producers keep having to go further and crazier in order to get the same reaction. Bukkake is passe, so now its throat fucking combined with giving her a pair of cream contacts, where the fuck does it stop......
Cannabalistic gangrape porn with animals ?

Posted: 2004-03-10 05:48am
by InnerBrat
I don't think it's necessarily true that blokes are better because they have dicks. I've received cunnlingus from both males and females, and the males have been the best at that.. so meh.

Posted: 2004-03-10 05:50am
by Stofsk
Thinkmarble wrote:Cannabalistic gangrape porn with animals ?
If they ever come up with "Gangbang Girl versus Bambi: The Last Supper" I'll know who to send the letterbomb to. :wink:

Posted: 2004-03-10 06:59am
by Einhander Sn0m4n
Uraniun235 wrote:
Darth Wong wrote:Ha ha, my use of thinly veiled anal sex innuendo instead of explicit anal sex references is clearly having its desired effect of throwing people off-balance.
Fortunately, I have no fixation with anal sex, and thus the use or omission of references to such cannot faze me! Haha!
Image



Sorry guys, I just had to do it...

Posted: 2004-03-10 07:30am
by Gandalf
I find the concept of head a little odd. I feel like I should do something. Though I feel no problem with me going down on her.

Posted: 2004-03-10 09:17am
by Jon
====== -) --- >o

I know my 'best' friend once allowed a dog to lick a dick for a while while he was drunk. :roll: at a part in front of alot of people. He'll NEVER live that down.

I though, am not a fan of the beastiality.

Posted: 2004-03-10 02:36pm
by Illuminatus Primus
Darth Wong wrote:It would be easy to tell, since the female would require an hour of persuasion beforehand :D
:lol:
Darth Wong wrote:Actually, I think blowjobs are overrated. While they do feel very good, the feeling of total passivity bothers me. I suppose everyone has a different definition of masculinity in the sex act, but for me it means that I have to take an active role. In order to really enjoy myself, I need to grab ahold of her hips and start driving.
Oh I like it very much, but I sympathize.

I get too damn antsy and just yearn to start the screwing already.

Posted: 2004-03-10 06:40pm
by Lord Pounder
I'd know the difference. The gay guy wouldn't hesitate to swallow. Cum in a womans mouth and she'll spit it back in your face, literally.

Posted: 2004-03-10 06:48pm
by DPDarkPrimus
Lord Pounder wrote:I'd know the difference. The gay guy wouldn't hesitate to swallow. Cum in a womans mouth and she'll spit it back in your face, literally.
What, it's just a legend that some women swallow?

Posted: 2004-03-10 06:51pm
by The Yosemite Bear
I don't know....

Neither sarah or dawn ever would give me one....

and michelle in high school was a year younger then me, and thus we never did anything, especially that last year we were together it would have been illegal.

Posted: 2004-03-10 07:10pm
by RedImperator
Lord Pounder wrote:I'd know the difference. The gay guy wouldn't hesitate to swallow. Cum in a womans mouth and she'll spit it back in your face, literally.
This is what they call an unfounded generalization.