Page 2 of 5
Posted: 2004-03-23 01:32am
by kojikun
Being a furry does not require principle attraction to anthros. It does not require any at all. Get your definitions straight before you say stupid shit.
Ein: The fuck are you talking about?
Posted: 2004-03-23 01:33am
by Spanky The Dolphin
I find it somewhat ugly for some reason...

Posted: 2004-03-23 01:49am
by Kuja
fgalkin wrote:Bah, all your pics fail before the power of
GADGET
NYANG!

Posted: 2004-03-23 02:19am
by Gandalf
fgalkin wrote:Bah, all your pics fail before the power of
GADGET
BOING!

Posted: 2004-03-23 03:05am
by Vertigo1
Sorry, but Angela from Gargoyles > Gadget anyday.

Posted: 2004-03-23 03:10am
by Tsyroc
Zaia wrote:Well, who's surprised? I mean, after all, you are dating a cat...
Mabye he's one of those "hairless" cats.
The first question should be whether InnerBrat has had a tendancy to be attracted to guys with lots of chest and back hair?

Posted: 2004-03-23 10:32am
by Ravenwing
fgalkin wrote:Bah, all your pics fail before the power of
GADGET
say what?

i can honestly say i never lusted after a cartoon rodent........
Posted: 2004-03-23 10:49am
by SyntaxVorlon
Spanky The Dolphin wrote:
I find it somewhat ugly for some reason...

You're being sucked in by the yiffy, run spanky run!
Posted: 2004-03-23 11:01am
by Spanky The Dolphin
No, it's just that I find those kind of modified images to be pretty pointless and stupid, that's all.
Posted: 2004-03-23 11:08am
by Peregrin Toker
Ravenwing wrote:fgalkin wrote:Bah, all your pics fail before the power of
GADGET
say what?

i can honestly say i never lusted after a cartoon rodent........
It's NOTHING compared to those people who lust after Greys. (y'know, actual Greys, not certain Earthling women with an uncanny resemblance to Greys)
BTW, Fgalkin... did you do that yourself?
Posted: 2004-03-23 11:14am
by fgalkin
According to my art teacher, I have the artistic ability of a three year old. Does that answer your question?
Have a very nice day.
-fgalkin
Posted: 2004-03-23 11:15am
by Col. Crackpot
the question you need to ask yourselves is a simple one. Would you tap that ass? I'd imagine it gives the phrase 'a piece of tail' a whole new meaning.
Posted: 2004-03-23 11:18am
by Peregrin Toker
Col. Crackpot wrote:the question you need to ask yourselves is a simple one. Would you tap that ass? I'd imagine it gives the phrase 'a piece of tail' a whole new meaning.
That joke is
so old.
Posted: 2004-03-23 11:22am
by Col. Crackpot
Peregrin Toker wrote:Col. Crackpot wrote:the question you need to ask yourselves is a simple one. Would you tap that ass? I'd imagine it gives the phrase 'a piece of tail' a whole new meaning.
That joke is
so old.
so that is a yes?

Posted: 2004-03-23 11:23am
by Spanky The Dolphin
It may be old, but it's still a pretty funny pun.

Posted: 2004-03-23 11:50am
by Peregrin Toker
Col. Crackpot wrote:Peregrin Toker wrote:Col. Crackpot wrote:the question you need to ask yourselves is a simple one. Would you tap that ass? I'd imagine it gives the phrase 'a piece of tail' a whole new meaning.
That joke is
so old.
so that is a yes?

No, to the contrary! I find the idea of being sexually attracted to Gadget incredibly repulsive, but at least it's not necrophilia or one of its many offshoots.
Posted: 2004-03-23 12:07pm
by General Zod
well, ya know what they say about necrophilia: "The girls just can't resist you! So go on today and crack open a cold one!"
Posted: 2004-03-23 01:33pm
by Ace Pace
So I wasn't the only one!
Posted: 2004-03-23 02:27pm
by fgalkin
I hereby start the Cult of Gadget.
Have a very nice day.
-fgalkin
Posted: 2004-03-23 03:12pm
by InnerBrat
Zaia wrote:Well, who's surprised? I mean, after all, you are dating a cat...
Aramis was a dog, though.

See?
Mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
I have no idea what this 'gadget' thing was. It wasn't a patch on the Muskehounds, that's for damn sure.
Posted: 2004-03-23 03:14pm
by Peregrin Toker
Ace Pace wrote:So I wasn't the only one!
You're a necrophile?

Posted: 2004-03-23 03:18pm
by Spanky The Dolphin
InnerBrat wrote:Aramis was a dog, though.
*snip picture*
Heh, that's kind of wierd.
I have no idea what this 'gadget' thing was. It wasn't a patch on the Muskehounds, that's for damn sure.
Gadget was a female mouse, and one of the main characters from Disney's syndicated cartoon series
Chip 'n Dale's Rescue Rangers that first aired in the early to mid 90s.
Posted: 2004-03-23 03:24pm
by InnerBrat
Spanky The Dolphin wrote:InnerBrat wrote:Aramis was a dog, though.
*snip picture*
Heh, that's kind of wierd.

Not a good pic. I think it's mainly because he was sweet, romantic, and was kickass with a sword.
Although his poetry sucked.
Gadget was a female mouse, and one of the main characters from Disney's syndicated cartoon series Chip 'n Dale's Rescue Rangers that first aired in the early to mid 90s.
See? not a patch on the Muskehounds.
Posted: 2004-03-23 03:25pm
by Spanky The Dolphin
Well, if it helps any, I've never heard of your cartoon before, either.

Posted: 2004-03-23 03:28pm
by InnerBrat
*gasps*
You've never heard of Dogtanian and the Three Muskehounds?
Best cartoon since Dungeons and Dragons.