Bush's behavior becoming more 'erratic'

LordShaithis · Post by **LordShaithis** » 2004-06-05 02:31pm

Oh please, the Nixon comparisons are unjustified.

I mean, Nixon had a certain competency underneath his paranoia and corruption. Bush is just clueless.

Stormbringer · Post by **Stormbringer** » 2004-06-05 02:36pm

GrandAdmiralPrawn wrote:Oh please, the Nixon comparisons are unjustified.

I mean, Nixon had a certain competency underneath his paranoia and corruption. Bush is just clueless.

And we all know a cyborg with the head of Richard Nixon will rule us all in the year 3000.

Elfdart · Post by **Elfdart** » 2004-06-05 06:20pm

And Tricky Dick was legitimately elected, too.

MKSheppard · Post by **MKSheppard** » 2004-06-05 06:24pm

Elfdart wrote:And Tricky Dick was legitimately elected, too.

Oh GOD not this fucking bullshit, when the Washington
Post fucking counted everything and said Bush would have won anyway

Sokartawi · Post by **Sokartawi** » 2004-06-05 07:01pm

"Bush's Erratic Behavior Worries White House Aides"

Hmm is this the sequel to "Clinton's Erotic Behaviour Worries White House Aides"?

Patrick Degan · Post by **Patrick Degan** » 2004-06-05 07:19pm

MKSheppard wrote:
Elfdart wrote:And Tricky Dick was legitimately elected, too.
Oh GOD not this fucking bullshit, when the Washington
Post fucking counted everything and said Bush would have won anyway

Only by ignoring the standard set by Florida election law, that is...

Patrick Degan · Post by **Patrick Degan** » 2004-06-05 07:20pm

GrandAdmiralPrawn wrote:Oh please, the Nixon comparisons are unjustified.

I mean, Nixon had a certain competency underneath his paranoia and corruption. Bush is just clueless.

At this point, we could wish for the competency of Richard Nixon.

Uraniun235 · Post by **Uraniun235** » 2004-06-05 08:29pm

Shit, if it came down to a choice between the two, I'd take Nixon any day.

Slartibartfast · Post by **Slartibartfast** » 2004-06-06 02:17am

Bush is a loony, this article makes no difference at all.