Page 2 of 2

Posted: 2002-11-15 12:44pm
by Jupono
Darth Utsanomiko wrote:I haven't got the legs for a skirt. That's why I never made it into cheerleading in highschool, and god knows how hard I tried...

But anywho, I really don't like dresses in general. I prefer women in shirts and pants (if anything) :lol: .
lol i noticed your (if anything) haha and i know a guy that wears a kilt on a regular basis almost

Posted: 2002-11-15 12:50pm
by Kelly Antilles
Darth Utsanomiko wrote:No, trust me, they're not. They're both really freakin' pale, bony and totally covered in scraggly leg dark hairs. Except for where I wear my socks, which is almost devoid of any hair, so I have to wear them hight or the hairline looks really wierd. Plus my knees are somewhat knobby. :oops:

Now crop-tops, on the other hand, I'm fine with. I like showing off my six-pack abs. :wink:
*ahem* You do remember what I said when I saw your picture, right? Or have you forgotten? ;) :twisted:

Posted: 2002-11-15 01:09pm
by Alferd Packer
Stuart Mackey wrote:
Alferd Packer wrote:No, it's OK. I'm of largely Scottish descent.
Ignore my last reply to you, but get yer clan right.
Dinnae worry, I'll make sure it's the right one. :D

Re: Men, women, pants, and skirts...

Posted: 2002-11-15 01:57pm
by CmdrWilkens
Shinova wrote:If I remember correctly, women benefit if the area of their body near the uterus is kept warm and the men benefit if their balls are at a relatively cool temperature in relation tot he rest of their body.

With that in mind, I remember someone of fairly high educational status (probably a teacher) telling me and some other people that men would actually be better off wearing dresses and skirts while women wore pants. This arrangement would be most beneficial for each gender biologically.

What do you people think?
The testicles themselves have to bet kept cool but that is what circulaiton is all about and its ALSO the reason why your pelvic region is the warmest part of your body (you shed more heat there than anywhere else, armpits come in #2). Thus while you need circulaiotn the primary concern for reduing overheating there is removing the microclimate that exists just above the skin level. Right above your skin is a thin (mm or less thick) layer of air that is heated to almost the same temerature as the rest of your body. Obvioiusly this heaing process expels energized air molecules and attracts new ones even if you are standing still. Now the only way to really expedite the process is to have that micro-climate disturbed, convection. By removing the layer repeatedly with wind you force a greater rate of heat transfer (heat transfers faster when the temperature difference is greater). However if you rip it away too fast then you force the body to devote more heat to a particular region to keep things up to body temperature. So its abalancing act you want air to move but not too much.

In other words boxers with pants are probably your best bet, air can move but your balls won't freeze off. Now I don't wear that combination but neh.

Posted: 2002-11-15 05:24pm
by Stuart Mackey
Alferd Packer wrote:
Stuart Mackey wrote:
Alferd Packer wrote:No, it's OK. I'm of largely Scottish descent.
Ignore my last reply to you, but get yer clan right.
Dinnae worry, I'll make sure it's the right one. :D
Aye, ye had better lad, or I will haff Jimmy round tae have a yarn in ye ear.

Posted: 2002-11-15 05:52pm
by ArmorPierce
I don't have no problems with skirts. I jus moved and I don't want to take all my clothes out of the box... so guess what I'm wearing now to cover up :wink:

Posted: 2002-11-15 05:54pm
by haas mark
I personally could not see myself in a dress/skirt/whatever. I personally don't like "free-balling" either.

Posted: 2002-11-16 01:24am
by Utsanomiko
Kelly, you only saw me in jeans. Don't make me email you a pic of my knees. Just don't

Let alone those six-pac abs of mine. Trust me; with my weight, either my ab muscles are visible through my skin, or my liver is.

Spanky can vouch for this (when he gets back, that is. Currently he is big Bird, and cannot post.), as he's seen me shirtless and in shorts.

Hey Spanky, "MUSCLES!!!" :mrgreen:

Posted: 2002-11-16 01:41am
by Darth Wong
Pants are more practical for work. And fertility is not an issue if you're a healthy male anyway, regardless of whether you wear pants. I wear pants, and I don't know what my sperm count is, but both times Rebecca and I decided to have a kid, I knocked her up in the first month after ceasing birth-control.

I don't need more fertility; if the first two were any indication, I'm packing more than enough firepower as it is.

Posted: 2002-11-16 01:52am
by Nova Andromeda
--Pant frigin' RULE! Women clothes suck (in general) and this can easily be verified by noticing how they like to wear men's clothes.

Posted: 2002-11-17 05:18am
by Stuart Mackey
Nova Andromeda wrote:--Pant frigin' RULE! Women clothes suck (in general) and this can easily be verified by noticing how they like to wear men's clothes.
I should point out that skirts can be very conveniant if you want a quikie.

Posted: 2002-11-17 05:40am
by neoolong
Stuart Mackey wrote:
Nova Andromeda wrote:--Pant frigin' RULE! Women clothes suck (in general) and this can easily be verified by noticing how they like to wear men's clothes.
I should point out that skirts can be very conveniant if you want a quikie.
What's even more convenient is if she's already naked. :twisted:

Posted: 2002-11-17 05:43am
by Stuart Mackey
neoolong wrote:
Stuart Mackey wrote:
Nova Andromeda wrote:--Pant frigin' RULE! Women clothes suck (in general) and this can easily be verified by noticing how they like to wear men's clothes.
I should point out that skirts can be very conveniant if you want a quikie.
What's even more convenient is if she's already naked. :twisted:
well there is that, but if she gets arrested for indecent exposure in public that could be mite inconveniant.