Page 2 of 4

Posted: 2002-11-20 10:12pm
by MKSheppard
fgalkin wrote:Mike tried to get us to invade our only ally. He should be banned.
And what "ally" is that?

Posted: 2002-11-20 10:12pm
by Shinova
MKSheppard wrote:
Stormbringer wrote: Most of us do that ocassionally. He does it all the time! His entire post conut consists of such spam.
:x :oops: :P :twisted: :evil: :x :D :shock: :idea:

Has Sheppard ever been banned before?

Posted: 2002-11-20 10:15pm
by fgalkin
MKSheppard wrote:
fgalkin wrote:Mike tried to get us to invade our only ally. He should be banned.
And what "ally" is that?
SB.com. And before you say anything, they ARE our ally.

Have a very nice day.
-fgalkin

Posted: 2002-11-20 10:16pm
by MKSheppard
fgalkin wrote: SB.com. And before you say anything, they ARE our ally.
Bullshit. That hive of scum and villainy? ASVS has bitchslapped it around
so many times it isn't even funny.

Posted: 2002-11-20 10:16pm
by Shinova
fgalkin wrote:
MKSheppard wrote:
fgalkin wrote:Mike tried to get us to invade our only ally. He should be banned.
And what "ally" is that?
SB.com. And before you say anything, they ARE our ally.

Have a very nice day.
-fgalkin

I wouldn't be too sure about that, fgalkin :mrgreen:

Posted: 2002-11-20 10:16pm
by Shinova
MKSheppard wrote:
fgalkin wrote: SB.com. And before you say anything, they ARE our ally.
Bullshit. That hive of scum and villainy? ASVS has bitchslapped it around
so many times it isn't even funny.

And I wouldn't be too sure about that, either.

Posted: 2002-11-20 10:18pm
by MKSheppard
Shinova wrote: And I wouldn't be too sure about that, either.

SANCHEZ!


Educate these morons on the great ASVS invasion of SB and how
you guys owned the place after the first few days of debate...

Posted: 2002-11-20 10:19pm
by Spanky The Dolphin
fgalkin, do the words "Wong is Wrong" mean anything to you?

Posted: 2002-11-20 10:20pm
by Shinova
MKSheppard wrote:
Shinova wrote: And I wouldn't be too sure about that, either.

SANCHEZ!


Educate these morons on the great ASVS invasion of SB and how
you guys owned the place after the first few days of debate...

So ASVS willingly, with malicious intent, invaded SB. Does this somehow make ASVS better?

And why don't we invite ASVS to invade SD.NET while we're at it?

Posted: 2002-11-20 10:21pm
by MKSheppard
Shinova wrote: So ASVS willingly, with malicious intent, invaded SB. Does this somehow make ASVS better?
Yes. :twisted:
And why don't we invite ASVS to invade SD.NET while we're at it?
Don't need to. Look at how many of the Moderators on SDN are ASVS
regulars. We fucking CONTROL the place.

Posted: 2002-11-20 10:21pm
by Spanky The Dolphin
Because ASVS is on our side.

Posted: 2002-11-20 10:23pm
by MKSheppard
Spanky The Dolphin wrote:Because ASVS is on our side.
You mistake "on our side" for benevolence. ASVS completely controls
SDN through the Moderator positions, and we crush SB.com'ers wherever
they show up.

Posted: 2002-11-20 10:24pm
by Shinova
MKSheppard wrote:
Shinova wrote: So ASVS willingly, with malicious intent, invaded SB. Does this somehow make ASVS better?
Yes. :twisted:
And why don't we invite ASVS to invade SD.NET while we're at it?
Don't need to. Look at how many of the Moderators on SDN are ASVS
regulars. We fucking CONTROL the place.

Your second part:

That's not my point. My point is if ASVS launched a full-scale invasion against sd.net, would it suceed where SB did not?

And about sd.net regulars being former or concurrent ASVS--irrelevant.

Posted: 2002-11-20 10:25pm
by Shinova
MKSheppard wrote:
Spanky The Dolphin wrote:Because ASVS is on our side.
You mistake "on our side" for benevolence. ASVS completely controls
SDN through the Moderator positions, and we crush SB.com'ers wherever
they show up.

I don't see fgalkin or me crushed. You talking about SBers in SD or SBers in ASVS?

Posted: 2002-11-20 10:25pm
by Spanky The Dolphin
I think we're loosing sight of what this thread is about.

Posted: 2002-11-20 10:26pm
by Stormbringer
Shinova wrote:your second part:

That's not my point. My point is if ASVS launched a full-scale invasion against sd.net, would it suceed where SB did not?

And about sd.net regulars being former or concurrent ASVS--irrelevant.
Acutally we've got so many ASVSers they couldn't really invade. They're as much members as you or I.

And for the record not everyone on Spacebattles.com is an idiot. There are a lot of them but then again there are a lot more members period.

Posted: 2002-11-20 10:26pm
by Shinova
Spanky The Dolphin wrote:I think we're loosing sight of what this thread is about.

Not my fault.


And I think the majority considers him fit to be banned, so the issue is just about settled already.

Posted: 2002-11-20 10:29pm
by Crown
No. I have never had any problems with him.

Posted: 2002-11-20 11:12pm
by Cal Wright
I say we give him some sort of restriction. Forcebly cutting back on number of posts he can have in a single day or a temp. ban. Just to get the little bugger back under control.

Posted: 2002-11-21 01:22am
by haas mark
Brief ban.

Posted: 2002-11-21 01:39am
by Dalton
MKSheppard wrote:You mistake "on our side" for benevolence. ASVS completely controls SDN through the Moderator positions, and we crush SB.com'ers wherever they show up.
Cut the bullshit, Shep.

Jesus. You make us out to be the fucking ASVS gestapo or something.

Posted: 2002-11-21 01:46am
by Shinova
I repeat my earlier suggestion that we make Mike only able to post once per five minutes. That way he'll eventually adjust to put more content into his posts...and would cut down his posts per day by a lot.

Posted: 2002-11-21 01:51am
by Spanky The Dolphin
I don't think that would help.

Posted: 2002-11-21 01:55am
by Shinova
Spanky The Dolphin wrote:I don't think that would help.

How so?

Posted: 2002-11-21 01:57am
by Spanky The Dolphin
Because if he won't listen to a mod, he's sure as hell not going to improve himself on his own from a posting limit.