Posted: 2002-11-20 10:12pm
And what "ally" is that?fgalkin wrote:Mike tried to get us to invade our only ally. He should be banned.
StarDestroyer.Net BBS
Get your fill of sci-fi, science, and mockery of stupid ideas
http://stardestroyer.dyndns-home.com/
Should Mike_6002 be banned?
Page 2 of 4
Posted: 2002-11-20 10:12pm
MKSheppard wrote:Stormbringer wrote: Most of us do that ocassionally. He does it all the time! His entire post conut consists of such spam.
Has Sheppard ever been banned before?
Posted: 2002-11-20 10:15pm
SB.com. And before you say anything, they ARE our ally.MKSheppard wrote:And what "ally" is that?fgalkin wrote:Mike tried to get us to invade our only ally. He should be banned.
Have a very nice day.
-fgalkin
Posted: 2002-11-20 10:16pm
Bullshit. That hive of scum and villainy? ASVS has bitchslapped it aroundfgalkin wrote: SB.com. And before you say anything, they ARE our ally.
so many times it isn't even funny.
Posted: 2002-11-20 10:16pm
fgalkin wrote:SB.com. And before you say anything, they ARE our ally.MKSheppard wrote:And what "ally" is that?fgalkin wrote:Mike tried to get us to invade our only ally. He should be banned.
Have a very nice day.
-fgalkin
I wouldn't be too sure about that, fgalkin
Posted: 2002-11-20 10:16pm
MKSheppard wrote:Bullshit. That hive of scum and villainy? ASVS has bitchslapped it aroundfgalkin wrote: SB.com. And before you say anything, they ARE our ally.
so many times it isn't even funny.
And I wouldn't be too sure about that, either.
Posted: 2002-11-20 10:18pm
Shinova wrote: And I wouldn't be too sure about that, either.
SANCHEZ!
Educate these morons on the great ASVS invasion of SB and how
you guys owned the place after the first few days of debate...
Posted: 2002-11-20 10:19pm
fgalkin, do the words "Wong is Wrong" mean anything to you?
Posted: 2002-11-20 10:20pm
MKSheppard wrote:Shinova wrote: And I wouldn't be too sure about that, either.
SANCHEZ!
Educate these morons on the great ASVS invasion of SB and how
you guys owned the place after the first few days of debate...
So ASVS willingly, with malicious intent, invaded SB. Does this somehow make ASVS better?
And why don't we invite ASVS to invade SD.NET while we're at it?
Posted: 2002-11-20 10:21pm
Yes.Shinova wrote: So ASVS willingly, with malicious intent, invaded SB. Does this somehow make ASVS better?
Don't need to. Look at how many of the Moderators on SDN are ASVSAnd why don't we invite ASVS to invade SD.NET while we're at it?
regulars. We fucking CONTROL the place.
Posted: 2002-11-20 10:21pm
Because ASVS is on our side.
Posted: 2002-11-20 10:23pm
You mistake "on our side" for benevolence. ASVS completely controlsSpanky The Dolphin wrote:Because ASVS is on our side.
SDN through the Moderator positions, and we crush SB.com'ers wherever
they show up.
Posted: 2002-11-20 10:24pm
MKSheppard wrote:Yes.Shinova wrote: So ASVS willingly, with malicious intent, invaded SB. Does this somehow make ASVS better?
Don't need to. Look at how many of the Moderators on SDN are ASVSAnd why don't we invite ASVS to invade SD.NET while we're at it?
regulars. We fucking CONTROL the place.
Your second part:
That's not my point. My point is if ASVS launched a full-scale invasion against sd.net, would it suceed where SB did not?
And about sd.net regulars being former or concurrent ASVS--irrelevant.
Posted: 2002-11-20 10:25pm
MKSheppard wrote:You mistake "on our side" for benevolence. ASVS completely controlsSpanky The Dolphin wrote:Because ASVS is on our side.
SDN through the Moderator positions, and we crush SB.com'ers wherever
they show up.
I don't see fgalkin or me crushed. You talking about SBers in SD or SBers in ASVS?
Posted: 2002-11-20 10:25pm
I think we're loosing sight of what this thread is about.
Posted: 2002-11-20 10:26pm
Acutally we've got so many ASVSers they couldn't really invade. They're as much members as you or I.Shinova wrote:your second part:
That's not my point. My point is if ASVS launched a full-scale invasion against sd.net, would it suceed where SB did not?
And about sd.net regulars being former or concurrent ASVS--irrelevant.
And for the record not everyone on Spacebattles.com is an idiot. There are a lot of them but then again there are a lot more members period.
Posted: 2002-11-20 10:26pm
Spanky The Dolphin wrote:I think we're loosing sight of what this thread is about.
Not my fault.
And I think the majority considers him fit to be banned, so the issue is just about settled already.
Posted: 2002-11-20 10:29pm
No. I have never had any problems with him.
Posted: 2002-11-20 11:12pm
I say we give him some sort of restriction. Forcebly cutting back on number of posts he can have in a single day or a temp. ban. Just to get the little bugger back under control.
Posted: 2002-11-21 01:22am
Brief ban.
Posted: 2002-11-21 01:39am
Cut the bullshit, Shep.MKSheppard wrote:You mistake "on our side" for benevolence. ASVS completely controls SDN through the Moderator positions, and we crush SB.com'ers wherever they show up.
Jesus. You make us out to be the fucking ASVS gestapo or something.
Posted: 2002-11-21 01:46am
I repeat my earlier suggestion that we make Mike only able to post once per five minutes. That way he'll eventually adjust to put more content into his posts...and would cut down his posts per day by a lot.
Posted: 2002-11-21 01:51am
I don't think that would help.
Posted: 2002-11-21 01:55am
Spanky The Dolphin wrote:I don't think that would help.
How so?
Posted: 2002-11-21 01:57am
Because if he won't listen to a mod, he's sure as hell not going to improve himself on his own from a posting limit.