StarDestroyer.Net BBS

I joined right after DarkStar and right before Wicked Pilot (I think).

Just some trivia.

They're sleeper cells. Ready in wait for Graham Kennedy to give the word. Then all of a sudden out of nowhere, *BAM!* endless Star Trek spam. We need to hunt them down and deport their sorry asses before it's too late.

Who's with me?

aerius wrote:

neoolong wrote:And by that criteria I outrank the lot of you. So STFU. *Force chokes everyone*


Just kidding.

What were you saying about joined dates? Hmmmm?

Hey, the people that posted right before me joined later than me.

Sounds like someone's trying to skew polls. I'd bet more then one of those is from a troll facing a ban poll attempted to save themselves.

uh what does woot mean?

Einhander Sn0m4n wrote:

Gambler wrote:I hope you don't delete my account

*snip*
***POKE!***

Get back to your corner, n00b! *thwap!*

Have a very nice day.
-fgalkin

I've got 15 guys above me. Bug off.

They probably do what I do a lot, register and then forget about the website, or register but doesn' t post. Actually I don' t register immediately usually until I have something to say because no one is saying it, that' s why I joined SB.

bah, I was on stardestroyer.net on July 3rd but I left before Mike put up the board.

If you use the date that you joined as rank than I am one of the top posters

I left to go to England on July 3rd, never had the chance to joinup until Sept.

Howedar wrote:I've got 15 guys above me. Bug off.

You've got here earlier. So what?

Have a very nice day.
-fgalkin

Beowulf wrote:

Spanky The Dolphin wrote:Bang.

*cough cough*

*ahem* *WHAM!*

*Activates Pis Blades, removes Beowulf's arm, then crushes his larynx*

What was that again?

Perhaps jail time, comas, and being commited prevented people from posting.

Or, they just had some probelm and gave up. When I first registered, I spent 30 minutes trying to post, until I realized that the name I wanted exceeded the character limit, and I got stuck with "Smi". I never noticed that until I looked atr who was online, on the bottom of the board.

Ted wrote:

verilon wrote:Einy....he outranks you by months. He DOES have seniority, or did you not bother to look at the joined date?

Yeah, and by joined dates, I out rank you and Einy

And I outrank you. Muwhahaha. Not that funny anyway hehe.

Ted wrote:Yeah, and by joined dates, I out rank you and Einy

Bah. I outrank all but 28 other people on this board.

verilon wrote:

Mr Bean wrote:Its been suggest before amoung the Moderators that anyone who does not post within two weeks of activating thier acount will have it deleted and far as I know Wong said he was going to put that into place....

Wong?

That does actually sound like a pretty good idea....but I wonder: do you want it to be only two weeks, or a whole month? Either way, but it IS up to you guys, so I'll step out.

I don't think it makes a difference whether it's a single week or a year, it's not about being idle, it's about creating the account and not even begin using it at all... anyway it also means that nothing is lost, obviously not the post count (0).

I joined 50th, however I'm number 6 in terms of post count. Of the five above me, only one joined before me, Darth Wong. All here shall bow before ME!

Slartibartfast wrote:

verilon wrote:

Mr Bean wrote:Its been suggest before amoung the Moderators that anyone who does not post within two weeks of activating thier acount will have it deleted and far as I know Wong said he was going to put that into place....

Wong?

That does actually sound like a pretty good idea....but I wonder: do you want it to be only two weeks, or a whole month? Either way, but it IS up to you guys, so I'll step out.

I don't think it makes a difference whether it's a single week or a year, it's not about being idle, it's about creating the account and not even begin using it at all... anyway it also means that nothing is lost, obviously not the post count (0).

Eactly, there's no need to keep the hundreds of people that pile up and never post. Look at Spacebattle, there are probably a thousand or more people that registered but never posted. There's no need to keep all of them around not to mention tying up names others might want.

I have just initiated a mass purge. All members who have been around for more than a month without posting are gone.

Darth Wong wrote:I have just initiated a mass purge. All members who have been around for more than a month without posting are gone.

Will that help at all eliminate the problem that appears every so often of pages not loading?

Darth Wong wrote:I have just initiated a mass purge. All members who have been around for more than a month without posting are gone.

HALLELUJAH! Praise the LORD! Wong hath delivered justice!

Darth Wong wrote:I have just initiated a mass purge. All members who have been around for more than a month without posting are gone.

That teach the morons who just signed up to brag about being on a fourm, good for you Wong, good for you

data_link wrote:

Darth Wong wrote:I have just initiated a mass purge. All members who have been around for more than a month without posting are gone.

HALLELUJAH! Praise the LORD! Wong hath delivered justice!

Sorta. Though there are some people who DO post who should be deleted.

Say CSS wannabe and Apologist.

I would suggest that this be a regular thing. Say that every 3 months Wong looks at the posting list. If ur silent the whole time ur gone, Exceptions can be made if you notify admin that you are gonna be away or deafted to the army etc.

Sea Skimmer wrote:I joined 50th, however I'm number 6 in terms of post count. Of the five above me, only one joined before me, Darth Wong. All here shall bow before ME!

Wong has a double account. Therefore, you're actually user #49 and I'm #50. I should be on page 1! (but being the first on page 2 is also nice).

Have a very nice day.
-fgalkin