Posted: 2002-11-26 02:48pm
Lucky you. Though with the way she looks I wouldn't care if she is famous or not. 

Get your fill of sci-fi, science, and mockery of stupid ideas
http://stardestroyer.dyndns-home.com/
Oh yes, I seem to have forgotten something. She did mention that she has a place in California too, you too can join in on the stalking fun!neoolong wrote:Lucky you. Though with the way she looks I wouldn't care if she is famous or not.
Right and that would be normal and sane behavior.aerius wrote:Oh yes, I seem to have forgotten something. She did mention that she has a place in California too, you too can join in on the stalking fun!neoolong wrote:Lucky you. Though with the way she looks I wouldn't care if she is famous or not.
Do a search for "Kreviazuk" and my user name for even more sexy pictures of Chantal.
The singer is Chantal Kreviazuk, she's Canadian and a brief bio can be found here. She's pretty much unknown outside of Canada. http://www.askmen.com/women/singer/39c_ ... iazuk.htmlFaram wrote:Okay somone please fill me in. Who is that singer? What have she done?
Where is the homepage?
I need the big eyeglasses to see properly, those small funky designer ones just don't cut it. With the small ones I can see the entire frame in my field of view and end up having no peripheral vision at all. It's like taking my normal glasses and holding them half a foot in front of my eyes. Besides, I look like a dork with those tiny things. Anyways, another Chantal photo from the CD release concert.Andrew J. wrote:Nice!
And those are some rather large eyeglasses, if I do say so myself. Actually, I'm quite jealous.
They're just pictures...Evil Sadistic Bastard wrote:How'd you get to take so many pics? I thought security would've caught up with you.
You're suppose to take tons of pictures at these things. I took about 6 pictures, but that's only because I ran out of film. I probably would've gone through a whole roll if I had one. Doing this in a normal concert though would probably get your camera confiscated by security. Why people think they can get away with flash photography in a darkened concert hall I'll never understand. There's a reason for using high speed film, I'll post pictures from Chantal's September concert when I get home.Evil Sadistic Bastard wrote:How'd you get to take so many pics? I thought security would've caught up with you.
It's not like he tried to steal her underwear or something.verilon wrote:They're just pictures...Evil Sadistic Bastard wrote:How'd you get to take so many pics? I thought security would've caught up with you.
Now thats a thought...neoolong wrote:It's not like he tried to steal her underwear or something.verilon wrote:They're just pictures...Evil Sadistic Bastard wrote:How'd you get to take so many pics? I thought security would've caught up with you.
Ted wrote:Now thats a thought...neoolong wrote: It's not like he tried to steal her underwear or something.
LOL, so when you gonna post the rest of the pics Aerius?
AAHHHHHHHHHH The glaring white light!aerius wrote:Ted wrote:Now thats a thought...neoolong wrote: It's not like he tried to steal her underwear or something.
LOL, so when you gonna post the rest of the pics Aerius?
Note: I couldn't have stolen Chantal's underwear for the simple reason that she wasn't wearing any. Note that if you look carefully at the picture on the 1st page you can see the outline of her nipple, it shows up better on my hi-res scans.
Bruce Cockburn and Chantal
Photo taken at September concert in Roy Thomson Hall, damn spotlights messed things up.