StarDestroyer.Net BBS

Evil Sadistic Bastard wrote:

C.S.Strowbridge wrote: You're a fucking retard. It was a goddamn joke.

Considering the bullshit you posted that dumb crack was indistinguishable from the rest of your semen-soaked blatherings.

Ahh, attacking the person who pointed out your mistake. Anything else in that bag of tricks.

On the other hand, it's nice to have proof that you're no smarter than the creationists you attack.

I don't attack creationists. Not yet. It's nice to have proof that you cannot possibly be the real Strowbridge, because even lobotomized iguanas have demonstarted higher levels of intelligence.

It's called an insult. It doesn't have to be accurate, just insulting.

C.S.Strowbridge wrote: Baseless? When you pay a fine, do you get the money?

That's what ESB said.

"When people kill you the murderers will be PAID $10 million",

No, I said when people kill CSS wannabe the murderers of CSS wannabe will be paid $10 million, for "services rendered."

If that doesn't deserve an insult, then what does?

Most of your bullshit does.

C.S.Strowbridge wrote:

data_link wrote: Enough with the baseless insults. *thwap*

Baseless? When you pay a fine, do you get the money?

That's what ESB said.

"When people kill you the murderers will be PAID $10 million."

If that doesn't deserve an insult, then what does?

Oh, BTW, let's not turn stardestroyer.net into another Space Battles, where the clueless are protected from the insults their draw.

Idiot. He was saying that the people who would kill you would get paid $10 million. Are you really so stupid that you can't recognize an insult for the flames?

Since you insist on the clueless not being protected from insults...

YOU FUCKING MORON! YOU ARE DUMBER THAN EXCREMENT YOU STUPID FUCKED-UP CSS WANNABE! I OUGHTA FLUSH YOU DOWN THE TOILET, ASSWIPE!

CSS FUCKTARD: YOU are the one turning this into another SB. YOU are the one that attempted to hijack the thread. YOU are the one tking this WAY too seriously. And YOU are telling US not to make this another SB? PLEASE.....

C.S.Strowbridge wrote:
Ahh, attacking the person who pointed out your mistake. Anything else in that bag of tricks.

Mistake? There's no mistake in paying the people who kill you $10 million dollars. Hell, they should have a public holiday for it as well.

It's called an insult. It doesn't have to be accurate, just insulting.

To wit: your insults are neither accurate OR insulting.

Evil Sadistic Bastard wrote:

C.S.Strowbridge wrote:
Ahh, attacking the person who pointed out your mistake. Anything else in that bag of tricks.

Mistake? There's no mistake in paying the people who kill you $10 million dollars. Hell, they should have a public holiday for it as well.

And him and Pavel and Darkstar and Arminius and Azeron and Sith God and.....

verilon wrote:CSS FUCKTARD: YOU are the one turning this into another SB. YOU are the one that attempted to hijack the thread. YOU are the one tking this WAY too seriously. And YOU are telling US not to make this another SB? PLEASE.....

So I make an obvious joke. ESB doesn't recognize it as one, and I'm taking this too seriously. Right.

And I'm not hijacking a thread, I'm insulting a moron.

Evil Sadistic Bastard wrote:

C.S.Strowbridge wrote: Baseless? When you pay a fine, do you get the money?

That's what ESB said.

"When people kill you the murderers will be PAID $10 million",

No, I said when people kill CSS wannabe the murderers of CSS wannabe will be paid $10 million, for "services rendered."

No, that's not what you said. It may be what you what to have said, but it's not what you said.

C.S.Strowbridge wrote:

verilon wrote:CSS FUCKTARD: YOU are the one turning this into another SB. YOU are the one that attempted to hijack the thread. YOU are the one tking this WAY too seriously. And YOU are telling US not to make this another SB? PLEASE.....

So I make an obvious joke. ESB doesn't recognize it as one, and I'm taking this too seriously. Right.

And I'm not hijacking a thread, I'm insulting a moron.

If you are going to continue to call respectable people morons, you are going to get flamed. Flaming knocks a thread off-topic. Kncking a thread off-topic is considered hijacking. Please refrain from doing so. If you would like to debate, please create another thread, preferably in the HoS. Thank you.

You wrote:Oh, BTW, let's not turn stardestroyer.net into another Space Battles, where the clueless are protected from the insults their draw.

This is where you begin to take things too seriously.

verilon wrote:

C.S.Strowbridge wrote:

verilon wrote:CSS FUCKTARD: YOU are the one turning this into another SB. YOU are the one that attempted to hijack the thread. YOU are the one tking this WAY too seriously. And YOU are telling US not to make this another SB? PLEASE.....

So I make an obvious joke. ESB doesn't recognize it as one, and I'm taking this too seriously. Right.

And I'm not hijacking a thread, I'm insulting a moron.

If you are going to continue to call respectable people morons, you are going to get flamed.

Are you that fucking thin skinned that you can't take being called a, 'moron' without starting up a flamewar? You guys wouldn't last 5 minutes in ASVS.

So here's a bit of advice, when someone calls you a moron, take it like a man and move on.

But what you guys are doing is see one insult and concetrate on the insult not the argument. Isn't that what your 'god' Mike Wong calls a Style over Substance Fallacy. Yes, I do believe it is.

You wrote:Oh, BTW, let's not turn stardestroyer.net into another Space Battles, where the clueless are protected from the insults their draw.

This is where you begin to take things too seriously.

Umm, nope. Sorry. You're mistaken in your judgement of my emotional state.

C.S.Strowbridge wrote:

verilon wrote:

C.S.Strowbridge wrote: So I make an obvious joke. ESB doesn't recognize it as one, and I'm taking this too seriously. Right.

And I'm not hijacking a thread, I'm insulting a moron.

If you are going to continue to call respectable people morons, you are going to get flamed.

Are you that fucking thin skinned that you can't take being called a, 'moron' without starting up a flamewar? You guys wouldn't last 5 minutes in ASVS.

So here's a bit of advice, when someone calls you a moron, take it like a man and move on.

But what you guys are doing is see one insult and concetrate on the insult not the argument. Isn't that what your 'god' Mike Wong calls a Style over Substance Fallacy. Yes, I do believe it is.

This isn't ASVS. I do. And Mike Wong isn't my god. He never will be. He's just the Admin of the board.

You wrote:Oh, BTW, let's not turn stardestroyer.net into another Space Battles, where the clueless are protected from the insults their draw.

This is where you begin to take things too seriously.

Umm, nope. Sorry. You're mistaken in your judgement of my emotional state.

True, but you don't have to be so snotty about it.

verilon wrote:

C.S.Strowbridge wrote: But what you guys are doing is see one insult and concetrate on the insult not the argument. Isn't that what your 'god' Mike Wong calls a Style over Substance Fallacy. Yes, I do believe it is.

This isn't ASVS. I do. And Mike Wong isn't my god. He never will be. He's just the Admin of the board.

You're missing the point and concentrating on the insult, again.

Actually, it's two points.

1.) That's a fallacy.
2.) Moron isn't even a huge insult. On a scale of one to ten it would only rate 1, or maybe a 1.5. Hell, even calling someone, 'Fucking retarded.' wouldn't rate more than a 3.

You wrote:Oh, BTW, let's not turn stardestroyer.net into another Space Battles, where the clueless are protected from the insults their draw.

This is where you begin to take things too seriously.

Umm, nope. Sorry. You're mistaken in your judgement of my emotional state.

True, but you don't have to be so snotty about it.[/quote]

Uhh, that wasn't my intent.

C.S.Strowbridge wrote:

verilon wrote:

C.S.Strowbridge wrote: But what you guys are doing is see one insult and concetrate on the insult not the argument. Isn't that what your 'god' Mike Wong calls a Style over Substance Fallacy. Yes, I do believe it is.

This isn't ASVS. I do. And Mike Wong isn't my god. He never will be. He's just the Admin of the board.

You're missing the point and concentrating on the insult, again.

Actually, it's two points.

1.) That's a fallacy.
2.) Moron isn't even a huge insult. On a scale of one to ten it would only rate 1, or maybe a 1.5. Hell, even calling someone, 'Fucking retarded.' wouldn't rate more than a 3.

Please, I recanted trying to get into your head. Don't be a hypocrite, k?

verilon wrote:

C.S.Strowbridge wrote: You're missing the point and concentrating on the insult, again.

Actually, it's two points.

1.) That's a fallacy.
2.) Moron isn't even a huge insult. On a scale of one to ten it would only rate 1, or maybe a 1.5. Hell, even calling someone, 'Fucking retarded.' wouldn't rate more than a 3.

Please, I recanted trying to get into your head. Don't be a hypocrite, k?

What? All I'm saying is, if I insult you, don't concentrate on the insult. Insult me back and attack my argument at the same time. If you do that, we'll have no problem. In fact, you can just insult me back if it makes you fell better.

What's so hypocritical about that?

C.S.Strowbridge wrote:

verilon wrote:

C.S.Strowbridge wrote: You're missing the point and concentrating on the insult, again.

Actually, it's two points.

1.) That's a fallacy.
2.) Moron isn't even a huge insult. On a scale of one to ten it would only rate 1, or maybe a 1.5. Hell, even calling someone, 'Fucking retarded.' wouldn't rate more than a 3.

Please, I recanted trying to get into your head. Don't be a hypocrite, k?

What? All I'm saying is, if I insult you, don't concentrate on the insult. Insult me back and attack my argument at the same time. If you do that, we'll have no problem. In fact, you can just insult me back if it makes you fell better.

What's so hypocritical about that?

The fact that you said I missed the point. Which I did, but I may also have not. And you don't know that. That is what is so hypocritical. Next time you really want to argue something like this, take it to PM.

Also, I DONT concentrate on the insult until one does it repeatedly. And I don't like to insult until given reason. An insult may suffice, but it usually takes a few to get me truly angered. I think I am only really attacking you was because of the Kevlar thing.

verilon wrote:

C.S.Strowbridge wrote: What's so hypocritical about that?

The fact that you said I missed the point. Which I did, but I may also have not. And you don't know that. That is what is so hypocritical.

Ok, I understand.

Next time you really want to argue something like this, take it to PM.

But you asked me a question. Am I supposed to take a question you asked in a thread to PMs just to answer it?

C.S.Strowbridge wrote:

verilon wrote:

C.S.Strowbridge wrote: What's so hypocritical about that?

The fact that you said I missed the point. Which I did, but I may also have not. And you don't know that. That is what is so hypocritical.

Ok, I understand.

Next time you really want to argue something like this, take it to PM.

But you asked me a question. Am I supposed to take a question you asked in a thread to PMs just to answer it?

Yeah. Just say you answered it via PM. I do it all the time.

verilon wrote:

C.S.Strowbridge wrote: But you asked me a question. Am I supposed to take a question you asked in a thread to PMs just to answer it?

Yeah. Just say you answered it via PM. I do it all the time.

... Or you could ask the question via PM.

C.S.Strowbridge wrote:

verilon wrote:

C.S.Strowbridge wrote: But you asked me a question. Am I supposed to take a question you asked in a thread to PMs just to answer it?

Yeah. Just say you answered it via PM. I do it all the time.

... Or you could ask the question via PM.

True, but I think part of it was part of an actual post.