Pablo strikes again: Ship Classes

Ender · Post by **Ender** » 2005-08-20 09:37am

VT-16 wrote:Yes, and they can´t really ignore this evidence thanks to Dark Empire´s Allegiance.

They do it anyways be claiming that Allegiance was suppossed to be an Executor class and that it looks different thanks to artistic liscense. Of course, the same looking ship comes up again escorting the Eclipse, guarding the Galaxy gun, and over Nar Shada, but whatever.

VT-16 · Post by **VT-16** » 2005-08-20 10:28am

How does this get turned into this thanks to "artistic license"? Are they brain-damaged?

The Dark · Post by **The Dark** » 2005-08-21 05:47pm

Noble Ire wrote:Arc goes on to say that some secretive friend of his has this book which he would only identify as "Guide to Starships volume nine, copyright 04-05." He goes on to say that this friend says that both the Executor and Super classes exist, Supers being base models and command ships, like the Executor and Lusankya, being heavily modified Executor classes. Has anyone ever heard anything about this theory, or this book, which I am unable to find on the web?

*head scratch* The only vehicles guides I know of are the New Essential Guide to Vehicles and Vessels, and ICS:ROTS (subtitled The Definitive Guide to Spaceships and Vehicles).

President Sharky · Post by **President Sharky** » 2005-08-21 06:04pm

There is no "Guide to starships volume 9", he's making shit up. Ask him who the authors are, and he'll make shit up. Call him on this.

Noble Ire · Post by **Noble Ire** » 2005-08-21 10:08pm

President Sharky wrote:There is no "Guide to starships volume 9", he's making shit up. Ask him who the authors are, and he'll make shit up. Call him on this.

He has already conceeded, saying that his friend refused to say anymore on the subject and thus he has no evidence to back up the claim. It is quite suspecious I know, but I'm not going to force the issue now that it is done.