Posted: 2002-12-24 10:51am
Hey, I think it's pretty cool that TIEs suddenly come out of Star Destroyers. *heh*Vympel wrote: Return of the Jedi space battle could use some sprucing up- it's anemic.
Get your fill of sci-fi, science, and mockery of stupid ideas
http://stardestroyer.dyndns-home.com/
Hey, I think it's pretty cool that TIEs suddenly come out of Star Destroyers. *heh*Vympel wrote: Return of the Jedi space battle could use some sprucing up- it's anemic.
That would be the THX edition which can be obtained very cheaply now at many second hand shops and market stalls. I picked mine up for a piddling £4 years ago, the special editions have killed the demand for them so they are cheap.jmac wrote:I wouldn't mind him making changes too much IF he keeps the originals around and ALL the new revised versions are clearly labeled as such. The way it is now is so confusing with the "special edition" "collector's edition" "new edition" "limited edition" and all that other stuff, it's enough to make my head spin! How is someone suppose to keep it all straight? All I want is a nice unedited '77 version of Star Wars with the picture and sound touched up, and I have now idea if it even exists or where to find one!
To be honest, I think they match up pretty well.Durandal wrote:No sense in replacing the already fine actor with Hayden Christensen. It's believable that being thrown into a lava pit and spending a good deal of time behind a black mask will change a person's face.
Bloody definitely. That wierd woman (yes it's a woman with the eyes of a cat or something) with the voice totally unlike McDiarmid's is just odd. Get rid of it.What I think ought to be redone is Vader's communication with the Emperor in TESB. Digitally replacing the other guy with Ian McDiarmaid wouldn't be very hard, as most of the shots with him in them are shots of only him, and it would add tremendously to consistency.
Definitely.Also, slipping the Imperial March into ANH somewhere would be cool. To date, it's been in every installment in one form or another except ANH. Other than that, I think ANH is OK.
I don't know about increasing the length, as it requires new music, and while this isn't hard it does stuff up some scenes- re: the longer Boba Fett chasing the Falcon scene, where the music goes that one extra bit and it just seems wrong (I know shit about music, so sue me if I don't know the exact terminology)The space battle in RotJ should be revamped. It should be longer with more ships, scenes of capital ships exchanging massive amounts of fire, more explosions and all that good stuff.
Yup. I have a nostalgic film student friend who has the annoying habit of proclaiming that the older sabre effects look better. Don't ask me what he's smoking, I don't know. He's a bit anachronistic which I think can be explained because he's just getting into it and feels like he's missed out on all the film lore shit he's grown up on. He hates digital filming for example.One thing they should do for every installment is redo the lightsaber effects. Compared to the prequels, the lightsabers in the old trilogy look horrible. They look like giant permanent markers. Doing the white shaft with the Photoshop glow effect on all the old material would be cool.
It should be easily. They'd do well to replace the X-Wing targeting display, for example- make it more like Slave I's system in AOTC.Also, one thing that kind of bugs me is the scenery differences. If it was possible, I'd say that Lucas should try and spruce up the scenery in the Death Star, for example, when any kind of computer is present. Take the room in ANH where Artoo first interfaced with the Death Star. The wall is a bunch of cardboard-looking blinking lights with primitive-looking images on the computer screen. Replacing it with stuff more along the lines of TPM and AotC would be cool, but while keeping a more utilitarian, military look.
Doubt they'd do thatAlso, take out those stupid fucking pointless fire rings.
None of the suggestions I posted would ruin the trilogy in anything more than a nostalgia sense, except for taking out those stupid fire ring things. I'd much rather see the original trilogy as true to Lucas' vision as possible, rather than wallowing in nostalgia over a stupid cardboard set being replaced by a cooler and more real-looking digital set. All I want is effects modifications, not this idiotic pandering to whiny parents bullshit.Stormbringer wrote:George better not do with that. There's no sense fucking over the original and stilll superior original trilogy. The special editions are by and large an improvment with a few blunders. But to go in and gut the originals at the scale he suggests would ruin it.
I've never really thought of that before, but you're right. Although, to be fair, as a director (he didn't do RotJ, by the way), it's better to focus on small, one-man ships, because they only have one man.Uraniun235 wrote:The change I most want to see would be something done with the Endor battle; it just doesn't work that well, and I think it's partially because George never takes the time to focus on anything except his precious starfighters.
What about also including some of the large Imperial ships from Dark Empire - I don't mean the Eclipse and the likes of that, but the Allegiance-class Heavy Star Destroyer and the "humpback" battlecruiser seen at Byss (you know, the one escorted by a nearby ISD)??Vympel wrote:What they should add is more Rebel ships, preferably some of the Calamari cruiser designs that they didn't have time to build when they were filming ROTJ. More weaponry and in general more action is a must. And fuck can we please see the Executor own at least ONE enemy ship?
I disagree; one of the strengths of the Hoth sequence was that it was primarily focused on Hoth, and not jumping all over the place like ROTJ.In the Battle of Hoth i would liek to see the ISD's shooting down some of the transports
That would never happen- not only would everyone hate it, but there's nothing wrong with that fight.Darth Pounder wrote: In the OT Alec Guinness looked knackered and as the AOTC making of showed Actors can be cast over for doing Lightsaber scenes more specifically the Christopher Lee scenes.
Yeah, which means he's free to ruin it (which, IMO, he's done already).Icehawk wrote:George Lucas can do whatever the hell he wants with HIS story.
Hell, I agree with Irvin Kershner that Vader should never have been unmasked in the first place. I'd support a change that removes the unmasking scene altogether. Perhaps letting Luke see his unmasked face, but letting us see only the back of his head and Luke's reaction.Lord Poe wrote:Should Hayden Christensen in old age makeup replace Sebastian Shaw as the "unmasked Vader" at the end of ROTJ? Wouldn't this make the ending much more poignant?
Hell, I agree with Irvin Kershner that Vader should never have been unmasked in the first place
Yes.LMSx wrote:Where'd you hear that? Was there some interview with Irvin after RotJ?
As I said, whether or not Vader was unmasked, I think that we shouldn't have seen his face. Seeing the mangled back of his head in TESB was enough for me. Luke's teary-eyed reaction shot in ROTJ was enough for me.Vympel wrote:I liked the unmasking- it was a metaphor for him leaving the Dark Side.
How could he speak without a mouth ?Galvatron wrote:As I said, whether or not Vader was unmasked, I think that we shouldn't have seen his face. Seeing the mangled back of his head in TESB was enough for me. Luke's teary-eyed reaction shot in ROTJ was enough for me.Vympel wrote:I liked the unmasking- it was a metaphor for him leaving the Dark Side.
"I shot this scene very carefully. When the captain comes in and Vader is sitting in his capsule with his back towards us, all you see are scars on the back of his neck for half a second. I didn't want the audience to see anything else. I imagined that beneath the mask Vader was hideous; his mouth was cut away, and he had one eye hanging low. I was very surprised to see that he was an ordinary man in the third film."
- Irvin Kershner
Director
Star Wars: The Annotated Screenplays