Re: Harmless Christians
Posted: 2002-12-27 04:49pm
The problem here,Mike, is we are talkign about Moderate Christians. The people like myself who do not throw their beliefs on others, the ones who quietly live our lives taking strength in our faith without forcing it down the throats of others. You are focusing, as usual, on the extremes, rather than the subject we speak of.Darth Wong wrote:"Freedom of speech" ring a bell? How is anyone's freedom of religion damaged by criticism? Christians attack every other religion on a daily basis, in sermons and on TV. Why do they expect to be immune to counterattack?IG-88E wrote:Y'know Rob, despite liking you on the board, I have a massive urge to smack you IRL. WTF did they ever do to you, that you feel such an urge to tell them off? If their beliefs offend you, fine, be offended and shut the fuck up about it. You only have a right to complain when their belief inturde on yours. 'Freedom of Religion' ring a bell?
So you think all of us hold the Bible and God as portrayed in the old testament to be pure truth? I find it rather odd that you are here claiming to know the system of beliefs for a group of people when I can turn and tell you that you're falt out wrong.They worship a God who is defined by a Bible which is full of abhorrent hatred. Many of them don't even realize this, but there are differing schools of thought on the validity of pleading ignorance.And why the fuck are you attacking Christians? Remove 'Christian' from your rant, and you can replace it with dozens of different names. WTF makes moderate Chistians so fucking different?
So what you're saying is that his bigotry can be excused because he's bigoted against a choice the person made. Does this mean we have the right to hate gays because they have made a lifestyle choice?Unlike most bigots, Robert can say two things:And I think you're a bigot. We're even.
1) Christians are not forced to be Christians. A Christian can change his beliefs voluntarily (unlike a black guy who obviously cannot change the colour of his skin, Michael Jackson excepted).
I'm rather amazed by this as most of the Christians I associate myself with couldn't care two shits less about the amoralities of the old testament and tend to focus more on the new testament and the gospels in particular.2) Christians largely defend the moral authority of a book called the Bible, which is morally abhorrent in many ways. By choosing to defend something which is morally abhorrent, they make themselves answerable for its flaws.
Except for homophobes so I guess being a homophobe is okay then.The average bigot cannot point to any doctrines which are known to be voluntarily upheld by the target of his bigotry.
Oh okay then I withdraw the above statement regarding Christians who acknowledge the evils in the Bible. However I owuld caution that Brian is much more an example of moderate Christians which...is what we are talking about in the first place.The only place where I would differ from him is that I know many Christians who willingly concede that the Bible is full of evil ideas (Brian Young, for example).