Posted: 2006-11-04 01:27am
Blergh, shit -- shoulda made that just one unit off.
(As if I recall it's platoons that lieutenants command, but I concede re: the error of one rank.)
Get your fill of sci-fi, science, and mockery of stupid ideas
http://stardestroyer.dyndns-home.com/
Correct; a platoon commander is usually a lowely Lt.Edward Yee wrote:Blergh, shit -- shoulda made that just one unit off.(As if I recall it's platoons that lieutenants command, but I concede re: the error of one rank.)
That reminds me; one of the things I was going to put in my unfinished fanfic was somebody in the Maquis griping that their forces were totally unprofessional and that they were giving themselves all kinds of impressive-sounding ranks. Colonels and majors everywhere.Knife wrote:Correct; a platoon commander is usually a lowely Lt.Edward Yee wrote:Blergh, shit -- shoulda made that just one unit off.(As if I recall it's platoons that lieutenants command, but I concede re: the error of one rank.)
That would be interesting. I think some SW EU has touched on that as well, well; the rebellion side anyways. Too many Generals not enough Lt's.Darth Wong wrote:That reminds me; one of the things I was going to put in my unfinished fanfic was somebody in the Maquis griping that their forces were totally unprofessional and that they were giving themselves all kinds of impressive-sounding ranks. Colonels and majors everywhere.Knife wrote:Correct; a platoon commander is usually a lowely Lt.Edward Yee wrote:Blergh, shit -- shoulda made that just one unit off.(As if I recall it's platoons that lieutenants command, but I concede re: the error of one rank.)
You'd have a point if I looked for reading material via Google.DEATH wrote:So is the internet, thats what good filtering and search systems are forRedImperator wrote:The problem with FF.net is that it's stuffed to the gills with garbage.DEATH wrote: The problem (In my opinion) is that FF.net lacks any sort of "Hard" reviewing system..
All the filtering and reviews in the world won't help if the site is absolutely overwhelmed with trash. The sheer volume of incoming material means that most of it is going to wind up lost in a virtual slush bin regardless of quality.Yup, but marking good/bad by the other "Authors" (As bad as most are) would allow filtering of a sort, due to the fact that the better fics will start getting the lion's share of "views" (Rather like web-pages in that respect).There are a lot more people who think they can write than there are people who actually can, and FF.net has no editorial control whatsoever.
The average technical quality of fanfiction on this board is higher than normal - but honestly not as high as I'd like. I'm picky, though (ask any of the old ASVS crowd who remembered when I reviewed fanfiction). Still, if someone spends enough time actually trying to write proper English it's a sign that they might well have put some attention to detail in other parts of the story.Surlethe wrote:A question to those who have read more fanfics than I have: is this board's insistence on properly using English a factor in differing fanfic quality, or is the general technical level of writing the same all over?
You clearly haven't been to fanfiction.net or haven't read much there.Feil wrote:I doubt it. The ability and will to write in sentences with punctuation and reasonable dedication to spelling and grammar is a characteristic of almost anyone who writes stories, whether good or horrible; nobody writes stories who doesn't write sentences.
There's also a subforum dedicated to military affairs but not limited to active or former military personnel called the Heavy Armor Brigade.The trouble with that dedicated military sub-forum is that it's not open to the non-military bunch, so far as I know...
Each platoon would have a platoon sgt too. Anything from an E-5 to E-7 really, who runs the day to day operations.Are Sergeants high and mighty enough that they could be viewed as trusted masters of life and death (assuming they do their jobs properly)?
They're officers, they have to command something. But like I just mentioned, each platoon has a senior enlisted as the plt sgt....Who the hell came up with the idea of having O-1s command platoons, anyway? Wouldn't you want to have someone with experience for the job, like a senior enlisted or warrant officer, or an O-2/O-3?
Sounds like the Maquis took their inspiration from Starfleet.Darth Wong wrote: That reminds me; one of the things I was going to put in my unfinished fanfic was somebody in the Maquis griping that their forces were totally unprofessional and that they were giving themselves all kinds of impressive-sounding ranks. Colonels and majors everywhere.
You still need grunts to send into dangerous, unknown situations (read: planeteary landings) as opposed to the command staff of the fricken ship.frogcurry wrote:Once you eliminate certain duties the resulting reduced workload means less grunts, but you still need officers and a command chain.
No, what you need is an overall smaller crew with the same ratio of officers to enlisted personnel. Right now Starfleet is sending officers through four years of Academy training to do the kind of bullshit work an Able Crewman ought to be able to handle.frogcurry wrote:Once you eliminate certain duties the resulting reduced workload means less grunts, but you still need officers and a command chain.