Page 12 of 46

Re: SD.Net World Redux Comment Thread IV

Posted: 2008-11-13 02:26pm
by Siege
Fingolfin_Noldor wrote:Bah.. I've long been in the race for talent, with billions spent on R&D be it civilian or military. You guys are late.
I've spent billions on lasers, satellites and giant rockets. And I lead a nation chock full of ruthless megacorporations and their immoral R&D divisions. If there's anyone primed and ready for mad science, it's me :D.

Re: SD.Net World Redux Comment Thread IV

Posted: 2008-11-13 08:12pm
by Shinn Langley Soryu
Ex-Shepistani C-22s on sale for $10 million per plane, with 27 already sold off? Wow. Let me think for a moment.

The Langley Air Force will take delivery of fourteen regular C-22s; the Langley Postal Service and Skyfleet Cargo will each take delivery of eight. In all, that's thirty Antonovs that Lonestar no longer has to worry about.

Re: SD.Net World Redux Comment Thread IV

Posted: 2008-11-13 08:23pm
by Lonestar
I basically printed money there by assuming some Dominion companies would be purchasing some. :)

Also, consider your purchase request accepted!


Buyer beware, conditions may change with individual planes :)

Re: SD.Net World Redux Comment Thread IV

Posted: 2008-11-13 08:56pm
by Fingolfin_Noldor
SiegeTank wrote:
Fingolfin_Noldor wrote:Bah.. I've long been in the race for talent, with billions spent on R&D be it civilian or military. You guys are late.
I've spent billions on lasers, satellites and giant rockets. And I lead a nation chock full of ruthless megacorporations and their immoral R&D divisions. If there's anyone primed and ready for mad science, it's me :D.
Yeah, but I have double the size of your economy.

And I know a thing about lasers most of you don't. :wink:

Re: SD.Net World Redux Comment Thread IV

Posted: 2008-11-13 09:31pm
by TimothyC
Ok everyone remember when I said I was expanding my fleet of Hustlers?

Well it was a cover for what I'm really doing, I'm building a T-4/B-70 clone, only I've got an SJ-93 in the works (and the B-90 Vindicator will use 4 of them for Sub-orbital goodness).

Edit: It also has Pye Wacket and DAMS goodness to take names.

Re: SD.Net World Redux Comment Thread IV

Posted: 2008-11-13 09:56pm
by Lonestar
If you try to create a B-70 clone and get it operational within a few years, without explictly saying so before, I'm calling bullshit. It's a bit of a stretch to go up to a full blown strategic bomber B-70 analog, especially considering the inherant problems with the B-70 devolpement.

Re: SD.Net World Redux Comment Thread IV

Posted: 2008-11-13 10:04pm
by TimothyC
Lonestar wrote:If you try to create a B-70 clone and get it operational within a few years, without explictly saying so before, I'm calling bullshit. It's a bit of a stretch to go up to a full blown strategic bomber B-70 analog, especially considering the inherant problems with the B-70 devolpement.
1. It's smaller than a B-70 (It's Hustler sized).

2. I'm saying what I'm doing now, so that when the Hustler production doesn't match with what I'm saying I'm building you guys can take a closer look.

3. The "Object" was a scale model for aerodynamic testing.

4. I'm looking at getting the thing flying in 3 years, and operational about a year after that.

Re: SD.Net World Redux Comment Thread IV

Posted: 2008-11-13 11:35pm
by K. A. Pital
A T-4 clone is more likely. The T-4 is outdated though, so you could go with building newer configurations (T-4M or T-4MS comes to mind).

Re: SD.Net World Redux Comment Thread IV

Posted: 2008-11-13 11:48pm
by Fingolfin_Noldor
Stas Bush wrote:A T-4 clone is more likely. The T-4 is outdated though, so you could go with building newer configurations (T-4M or T-4MS comes to mind).
I might want to build some localised T-4MS in a year or so. :P

Do you have any specs for the T-4MS?

Re: SD.Net World Redux Comment Thread IV

Posted: 2008-11-14 05:14am
by Shroom Man 777
Lonestar:

I have SR-71s. What if I resumed production of them and weaponized them? :)

Re: SD.Net World Redux Comment Thread IV

Posted: 2008-11-14 05:33am
by PeZook
So...three days left. Anybody wants to do an "interview with Alan Shroompard" post? :D

Re: SD.Net World Redux Comment Thread IV

Posted: 2008-11-14 06:40am
by Shroom Man 777
Actually, I think Alan Shroompard should be a totally sane Shroomanian - which is why he has the honor of being the first man in space. I mean, a sane Shroomanian? That in itself is an achievement!

And, well, he should be totally modest. Have him thank the Byzantines and PeZookians and his home country for all that they've done, and for the Crimsons for making the world's AWESOMEST rockets!

Re: SD.Net World Redux Comment Thread IV

Posted: 2008-11-14 06:43am
by Fingolfin_Noldor
Shroom Man 777 wrote:Lonestar:

I have SR-71s. What if I resumed production of them and weaponized them? :)
Someone already did. Beowulf sells F-4s based on the SR-71.

Re: SD.Net World Redux Comment Thread IV

Posted: 2008-11-14 06:57am
by Shroom Man 777
F-4 Phantoms based on the SR-71 Blackbird? What?

Re: SD.Net World Redux Comment Thread IV

Posted: 2008-11-14 07:14am
by Fingolfin_Noldor
Shroom Man 777 wrote:F-4 Phantoms based on the SR-71 Blackbird? What?
I meant F-12D.

Re: SD.Net World Redux Comment Thread IV

Posted: 2008-11-14 11:18am
by Lonestar
Shroom Man 777 wrote:Lonestar:

I have SR-71s. What if I resumed production of them and weaponized them? :)
SR-71like interceptors already exist, both through Beowulf and Japanistan. The OD has a few Japanistani Mach 3+ Interceptors now in it's inventory, so... :)

Re: SD.Net World Redux Comment Thread IV

Posted: 2008-11-14 11:24am
by Fingolfin_Noldor
Hmm... Beowulf said he would deliver the consignment of 96 F-12Ds... but it will be something like 2013 before the whole order is complete..

Re: SD.Net World Redux Comment Thread IV

Posted: 2008-11-14 07:40pm
by CmdrWilkens
So with editing broken I can't add anybody to the treaty signature list but I know Canissia has signed since I was last able to edit. Has anyone else signed and I missed before I start either offering goodies or organizing worldwide boycotts :D ?

Re: SD.Net World Redux Comment Thread IV

Posted: 2008-11-14 09:16pm
by Shinn Langley Soryu
CmdrWilkens wrote:So with editing broken I can't add anybody to the treaty signature list but I know Canissia has signed since I was last able to edit. Has anyone else signed and I missed before I start either offering goodies or organizing worldwide boycotts :D ?
As a signatory to the biowarfare prohibition treaty, I'd like to know what goodies you have to offer.

Re: SD.Net World Redux Comment Thread IV

Posted: 2008-11-14 11:59pm
by TimothyC
Stas Bush wrote:A T-4 clone is more likely. The T-4 is outdated though, so you could go with building newer configurations (T-4M or T-4MS comes to mind).

Hm.

Might I be able to purchase some T-4 Airframes from you?

Re: SD.Net World Redux Comment Thread IV

Posted: 2008-11-15 01:18am
by K. A. Pital
I only have five, but yes, you can as soon as I replace them with something else.

Re: SD.Net World Redux Comment Thread IV

Posted: 2008-11-15 02:15am
by PeZook
Hmm....I wanted to kick Shroompard to orbit today, but can't. Monday seems like the closest possible date.

Re: SD.Net World Redux Comment Thread IV

Posted: 2008-11-15 03:13am
by Fingolfin_Noldor
Stas Bush wrote:I only have five, but yes, you can as soon as I replace them with something else.
What are you replacing them with?


Anyhow, do you plan to say anything at the SNC meeting?

Re: SD.Net World Redux Comment Thread IV

Posted: 2008-11-15 05:44am
by PeZook
Attention, all national leaders are invited for an official launch ceremony and killer afterparty with lots of alcohol and pretty hostesses.

No monkeys allowed. Sorry Shroom...

Re: SD.Net World Redux Comment Thread IV

Posted: 2008-11-15 06:21am
by Siege
I'm there. Do we launch around New Year? Because that would allow us to roll New Year and Succesful Launch parties into one!