Page 12 of 12

Posted: 2003-10-31 12:39am
by Connor MacLeod
Regarding the Mandel blueprints, I'm still not caring much on the issue of whether they are official or not (it seems like a pointless discussion that has little relevance to any of the original points) but I will point out that Gyndine has appeared in the AOTC ICS under the aethersprite entry. That indirectly suggests they have some status, in part at least. This doesn't

Posted: 2003-11-14 06:26am
by vakundok
Side question:
Isn't it possible that they were originally 'Star Destroyer' class cruisers (maybe with the first named as 'Star Destroyer')?

Side note:
I was wrong, stardestroyers (note the lowercase 's') even appeared in the rough draft of SW. They were at that time only fighters: 'Stardestroyers are two-man space craft crammed with sophisticated electronic weaponry.' and not exclusively imperial: 'Twelve pilots and navigators dash in unison to a line of waiting two-man starships of the destroyer class.'

Posted: 2003-11-14 06:57am
by Sarevok
Isn't it possible that they were originally 'Star Destroyer' class cruisers (maybe with the first named as 'Star Destroyer')?
Well the Star Wars official site describes them as battlecruisers. Since battlecruisers are essentialy cruisers with battleship guns your theory does have a point.

,

Posted: 2003-11-14 07:21am
by Vympel
Another interminable "what Star Destroyers actually fucking are" debate filled with endless arguments about whether they're destroyers/cruisers/battlecruisers/battleships/carriers/heavy starfighter carrying cruisers/dreadnoughts and whatever else is not happening. Been done positively to death.