Page 12 of 42
Posted: 2004-10-17 09:02am
by Ace Pace
Rob Wilson wrote:
You learn something new everyday, the wonder of the Internet.
And I think we'll end the Hijack on that note. Now back to Camwhorage.

I propose someone gets me a paypal account so I can accelerate Fey's next pic

which (if I understood it) is BOTM quality

Posted: 2004-10-17 09:09am
by Rob Wilson
Ace Pace wrote:Rob Wilson wrote:
You learn something new everyday, the wonder of the Internet.
And I think we'll end the Hijack on that note. Now back to Camwhorage.

I propose someone gets me a paypal account so I can accelerate Fey's next pic

which (if I understood it) is BOTM quality

Which of course would not be allowed to be shown in the public A&P forum. The absent nipple one was pretty much skirting the guidelines as it was.
Not that I'm against seeing more of the delectable young miss fey, just pointing out it couldn't be BOTM grade and show up in here.

Posted: 2004-10-17 09:12am
by Ace Pace
Thankfully, the picture would appear on her image account, which IS obtainable.
Not illegal, not even skirting

Posted: 2004-10-17 09:18am
by Rob Wilson
Ace Pace wrote:Thankfully, the picture would appear on her image account, which IS obtainable.
Not illegal, not even skirting

True, I was just pointing out it wouldn't be seen in A&P. Also I believe Skirting by a male is Illegal in several southern States with the exception of New Orleans.

Posted: 2004-10-17 09:30am
by Ace Pace
Rob Wilson wrote:
True, I was just pointing out it wouldn't be seen in A&P. Also I believe Skirting by a male is Illegal in several southern States with the exception of New Orleans.

Damn, so cross dressing shops do not exist in the south?
Posted: 2004-10-17 09:32am
by bohemianfey
bohemianfey wrote:
Woops. Rob is right I did forget the 1. Here's the pic I meant to post. (Sorry, QUITE drunk right now, so ignore any typos.)
Posted: 2004-10-17 09:35am
by Rob Wilson
bohemianfey wrote:Enticing eyes
Woops. Rob is right I did forget the 1. Here's the pic I meant to post. (Sorry, QUITE drunk right now, so ignore any typos.)
Very nice. New hair or just lots of lighting for the shot?
Posted: 2004-10-17 02:00pm
by RogueIce
Rob Wilson wrote:Which of course would not be allowed to be shown in the public A&P forum. The absent nipple one was pretty much skirting the guidelines as it was.
Not that I'm against seeing more of the delectable young miss fey, just pointing out it couldn't be BOTM grade and show up in here.

Isn't T&A allowed? I thought it was.
Ohhh, playing Mod. I feel so dirty.
Wait, playing Mod makes me feel dirty? Damn it, I need to get a life.

Posted: 2004-10-17 02:19pm
by Rob Wilson
RogueIce wrote:
Isn't T&A allowed? I thought it was.
Ohhh, playing Mod. I feel so dirty.
Wait, playing Mod makes me feel dirty? Damn it, I need to get a life.

No genitals, no nipples I think?
Posted: 2004-10-17 02:22pm
by Ghost Rider
Rob Wilson wrote:RogueIce wrote:
Isn't T&A allowed? I thought it was.
Ohhh, playing Mod. I feel so dirty.
Wait, playing Mod makes me feel dirty? Damn it, I need to get a life.

No genitals, no nipples I think?
Yeppers.
Posted: 2004-10-17 02:37pm
by Ace Pace
RogueIce wrote:
Ohhh, playing Mod. I feel so dirty.
Wait, playing Mod makes me feel dirty? Damn it, I need to get a life.

FUQ!
Posted: 2004-10-17 02:38pm
by RogueIce
Ace Pace wrote:RogueIce wrote:
Ohhh, playing Mod. I feel so dirty.
Wait, playing Mod makes me feel dirty? Damn it, I need to get a life.

FUQ!
Yes, I
could stand to get fuc...er, wait, you meant something else, didn't you?

Posted: 2004-10-17 02:41pm
by Ace Pace
Well, if you want to get fuced, I have both Einy and me waiting for you...
oh wait... you meant by a Gil...
Well, Gil IS here

Posted: 2004-10-17 08:22pm
by XaLEv
Posted: 2004-10-17 11:14pm
by bohemianfey
Rob Wilson wrote:bohemianfey wrote:Enticing eyes
Woops. Rob is right I did forget the 1. Here's the pic I meant to post. (Sorry, QUITE drunk right now, so ignore any typos.)
Very nice. New hair or just lots of lighting for the shot?
I actually dyed it a darker burgundy colour, but I used and IR filter on that one so it actully comes up as lighter.
Posted: 2004-10-18 01:11am
by SPOOFE
Heh, posting this one mostly 'cuz I think it could work as a Tom Waits album cover...

Posted: 2004-10-18 02:48am
by Arthur_Tuxedo
Or a beer commercial, since the bottle is the only thing in focus

Posted: 2004-10-18 03:04am
by SPOOFE
But neither label is pointed at the camera, which signified breach of contract, so they never used it... I mean, uh, what?
Posted: 2004-10-18 03:20am
by bohemianfey
Arthur_Tuxedo wrote:
Or a beer commercial, since the bottle is the only thing in focus

There aren't enough skanky women in that picture for it to be a beer commercial.
Posted: 2004-10-19 04:20pm
by bohemianfey
They're similar, but at the same time they're rather distinct and I can't choose between the two.
[Edit]Touched up the second picture.[/Edit]
Posted: 2004-10-19 06:25pm
by SPOOFE
I like the last one... since your form is smaller overall in the composition, it makes you seem more part of the scene rather than framed by the scene.
Actually, I think that same shot would look good with a strong Dutch angle.
Posted: 2004-10-19 07:00pm
by bohemianfey
SPOOFE wrote:I like the last one... since your form is smaller overall in the composition, it makes you seem more part of the scene rather than framed by the scene.
Actually, I think that same shot would look good with a strong Dutch angle.
I know what you mean (touched it up a litttle more and mirrored), but there wasn't the means for that type of angle at the time. Hell, getting the horizontal angle was tough.
Posted: 2004-10-19 07:02pm
by RogueIce
Is that a scar on your chest? I didn't notice it before.
Posted: 2004-10-19 07:05pm
by bohemianfey
RogueIce wrote:Is that a scar on your chest? I didn't notice it before.
Tehehe, no it's a couple threads from the shirt.
Posted: 2004-10-20 12:26am
by Rob Wilson
I agree with spoofe, the second works better. I haven't a clue about photography or compositional terms but it does appear more pleasing to the eye.
And is the first one a self-portrait of the camera? It's the only one fully in focus.
