Posted: 2008-05-08 04:53pm
D'oh, missed that one - although I think I would have got it had they been addressed as "Ma'am" and not as "Sir".JN1 wrote:Batty is also a character from the series
Get your fill of sci-fi, science, and mockery of stupid ideas
http://stardestroyer.dyndns-home.com/
D'oh, missed that one - although I think I would have got it had they been addressed as "Ma'am" and not as "Sir".JN1 wrote:Batty is also a character from the series
An explanation for the biblical version of what happened to Lott's wife?He began to jog away from the lava, towards the city centre, but he made one crucial mistake; he looking back. The lava flow had accelerated as more rock poured into the channel, and the intense heat seemed to scorch his eyes.
Being an English pub it's a toilet, or the gents. You've been in the States too long, Stu.Alex downed his sixth pint and lurched to his feet. "Back in a sec, mates." he slurred, as he made his way unsteadily to the men's restroom. Half way through the process of relieving himself, the world exploded into noise and darkness.
In a traditional yorkshire pub, it's called a wall.JN1 wrote:Being an English pub it's a toilet, or the gents. You've been in the States too long, Stu.Alex downed his sixth pint and lurched to his feet. "Back in a sec, mates." he slurred, as he made his way unsteadily to the men's restroom. Half way through the process of relieving himself, the world exploded into noise and darkness.
It was probably intended as an allusion to that event. But lava is only around 1000 to 1500 degrees C if I recall correctly, and while it's definitely hot, it's not like looking into the Sun.Gerald Tarrant wrote:An explanation for the biblical version of what happened to Lott's wife?He began to jog away from the lava, towards the city centre, but he made one crucial mistake; he looking back. The lava flow had accelerated as more rock poured into the channel, and the intense heat seemed to scorch his eyes.
I just wrote 'men's room'; Stuart probably decided to clarify it. 'Toilets' would be typical colloquial usage for students.JN1 wrote:Being an English pub it's a toilet, or the gents. You've been in the States too long, Stu.
You chose the strangest characters to get sympathetic about.Stuart wrote:Hence the problems the poor Baroness Yulupki was having.
If it was at those sorts of temperatures, it does hurt a bit. I was remelting volcanic rocks back to the molten state last year at temperatures between 1200-1600°C, the couple of times I chanced briefly looking in the furnace without the blast goggles with the black tinted screen, it was a bit painful. The second you took it out of the furnace though, the surface instantly quenches and you can look at it just fine.Darth Wong wrote:It was probably intended as an allusion to that event. But lava is only around 1000 to 1500 degrees C if I recall correctly, and while it's definitely hot, it's not like looking into the Sun.Gerald Tarrant wrote:An explanation for the biblical version of what happened to Lott's wife?He began to jog away from the lava, towards the city centre, but he made one crucial mistake; he looking back. The lava flow had accelerated as more rock poured into the channel, and the intense heat seemed to scorch his eyes.
It's a narrative description, not dialogue from the British character himself. There's no reason why it should employ British dialect.JN1 wrote:Being an English pub it's a toilet, or the gents. You've been in the States too long, Stu.Alex downed his sixth pint and lurched to his feet. "Back in a sec, mates." he slurred, as he made his way unsteadily to the men's restroom. Half way through the process of relieving himself, the world exploded into noise and darkness.
Oh sure, it's a bit painful, but a brief glimpse is not going to actually do serious damage. I've walked around a corner and seen an unshielded arc welder with the naked eye because some negligent moron didn't bother to put up the curtain. That was bad, but still only a cause of temporary pain. The Lot's Wife story implies serious damage, which doesn't make sense from light intensity alone.El Moose Monstero wrote:If it was at those sorts of temperatures, it does hurt a bit. I was remelting volcanic rocks back to the molten state last year at temperatures between 1200-1600°C, the couple of times I chanced briefly looking in the furnace without the blast goggles with the black tinted screen, it was a bit painful. The second you took it out of the furnace though, the surface instantly quenches and you can look at it just fine.Darth Wong wrote:It was probably intended as an allusion to that event. But lava is only around 1000 to 1500 degrees C if I recall correctly, and while it's definitely hot, it's not like looking into the Sun.Gerald Tarrant wrote: An explanation for the biblical version of what happened to Lott's wife?
Lava temperatures usually go up to about 1200°C, with basaltic lavas tending towards the higher end of that IIRC, but in the field, the immediate surface won't be that hot due to interaction with the air and the surface quenching to form cold chunks of carapace being dragged along on top.
Now imagine that filling most of your field of vision.El Moose Monstero wrote:I was remelting volcanic rocks back to the molten state last year at temperatures between 1200-1600°C, the couple of times I chanced briefly looking in the furnace without the blast goggles with the black tinted screen, it was a bit painful.
Unfortunately that establishment was only 400m or so directly downhill from the impact site. As such the lava was still very fresh and churned up when it got there.the immediate surface won't be that hot due to interaction with the air and the surface quenching to form cold chunks of carapace being dragged along on top.
Nope; as you say, simple radiant heat isn't enough to do that.Darth Wong wrote:It was probably intended as an allusion to that event.
Starglider wrote:You chose the strangest characters to get sympathetic about.Stuart wrote:Hence the problems the poor Baroness Yulupki was having.
It's only an observation and only a humorous aside at that. However if I'm writing something set in America I'd say restroom, or refer to an armored division, but to be totally honest it's not really important.It's a narrative description, not dialogue from the British character himself. There's no reason why it should employ British dialect.
NOOO! Oh the horror, the humanity! It's good that Hell stepped in when it did then.Of course they achieved this by drawing half a pint of strong ale and topping it up with half a pint of water, resulting in something even worse than Fosters.
Understanding is all based on context, so this one is kinda up in the air for lack of observations. The ancients are baffled by some of our technical jargon, mainly because it has no context.Darth Wong wrote: Remember that he's being auto-translated into modern English, not the English of his era. The English of the 15th century would be only barely recognizable to any of us. So while they might have said "loose" instead of "fire" back in the 15th century, that doesn't really have any bearing on the auto-translation into modern English.
Demonic naga also get four spike-tipped tentacles on their backs that shoot lightning and open hellgates, which has to come in handy from time to time.The Duchess of Zeon wrote: I'm the only one who when forced to choose in that one thread about what kind of mythological creature you would want to be if forcibly transformed into one, voluntarily selected ending up a Naga. For some reason, I just find the idea rather cool.
I'm glad you agree.JN1 wrote:NOOO! Oh the horror, the humanity! It's good that Hell stepped in when it did then.
Not sure I'd characterise someone who has been tortured in Hell for the equivalent of a lifetime, or more as a 'traitor', but as a torture victim. PoWs who have been tortured and gave away information have not been classified as traitors.Eulogy wrote:When humanity inevitably kills Belial and ruins his shit, the human traitors better hope that they are careful and smart enough not to blab that they helped the demons bomb the town, and lucky enough that nobody else rats them out.
Not to mention one of those traitors was so drugged up when he fingered Detroit that he didn't know where he was or who he was talking to, or that he had been tortured in hell for several decades!JN1 wrote:Not sure I'd characterise someone who has been tortured in Hell for the equivalent of a lifetime, or more as a 'traitor', but as a torture victim. PoWs who have been tortured and gave away information have not been classified as traitors.Eulogy wrote:When humanity inevitably kills Belial and ruins his shit, the human traitors better hope that they are careful and smart enough not to blab that they helped the demons bomb the town, and lucky enough that nobody else rats them out.
With the rate of healing in Hell, I doubt anyone will know for sure once they pull him out of whichever torture he gets thrown into.dragon wrote:Very nice. I have a question don't know if it has been asked before or not. What happens to the old or mangled people when they die, do they get new younger bodies. For example that private that just died will he appear in hell with a unmangled, unscarred body?
According to an 'American Rifleman' article, the .455 Webley cartridge had "approximately two-thirds the puissance of a .45 ACP." I also read that the Webley cannot handle high pressures.JN1 wrote:A bit of a handful, though, hence the move over to the .38 with the Enfield No.2 Mark 1 and Mark 1*, and the Webley Mark IV. The Enfield was a scaled-down version of the Webley Mark VI, and contrary to popular conception it was the Enfield that was army issue, though Webleys were bought during WW2 to make up the numbers.A great revolver indeed. They're not uncommon over here although most have been rebored to take .45ACP.
Not sure I approve of reboring to .45ACP, but I guess .455 is not easy to obtain. Some M1911s were rebored to .455 for the RAF to take things the other way.
Which suggests reboring a Webley revolver for the more powerful .45 ACP is a BAD IDEA. Comments from someone with better knowledge of firearms?Wikipedia wrote:Since the frame is in two parts, held together by a latch on the top rear of the cylinder, top-break revolvers are relatively weak, and cannot handle high pressure rounds.