I think it gets magnified by the board's general lack of activity and our relatively high rate of posting. I think if we'd gone at each other like this even three or four years ago it would have been buried by new threads and new posts fairly quickly.
I do agree with the sentiment though, I can't imagine I'd enjoy watching the same to people argue in thread after thread myself.
-----
Ask yourself this, is being a good man enough in a world where all eyes will be upon you? Who's to say he doesn't end up taking advice from somebody like Littlefinger who uses his lack of savvy to become the shadow ruler of the kingdom. As to Danny, there were signs before she burned King's Landing that she would have had serious issues ruling a nation as opposed to conquering one.The Romulan Republic wrote: ↑2019-05-20 12:45amSigh... Jon Snow. I'd have said Danny before they took her character to crazy town, but now... yeah, Jon. <snip the rest for brevity>
The characters you like the most aren't always the best rulers and the characters you feel uncomfortable with may have hidden virtues. Don't let frustration over a shaky first season cloud your ability to think logically here.
Any number of people could make a great leader, but to lead you must have the ability to obtain a position of leadership.Davos would be a great King, were there any way to make it happen.
We don't know how Bran will lead, he could be a savior or a tyrant. Is that not a fitting end for a series that never promised easy answers?But maybe it doesn't matter. Bran is so game-breakingly powerful that he's defacto ruler regardless. If someone else gets the job, its only because he let them.