And the person is alive and unharmed, often.
That's downright moronic.
Also, Steven Segal's movies reach a level of cliche idiocy no other action movie ever managed, in my view

Moderator: Edi
I'll take your SS movies and up you...Stas Bush wrote: Also, Steven Segal's movies reach a level of cliche idiocy no other action movie ever managed, in my view
That scene left me wondering why, if not incinerated, they didn't suffocate from either smoke or lack of oxygen thanks to the wall o' fire.Kanastrous wrote:And of course the flame front never expands laterally into the space where our family - and pet - are hiding...chitoryu12 wrote:
Ugh. Reminds me of Independence Day. Of course, they have to follow the rule that the family pet never dies. So just as the family runs into a maintenence passage in a tunnel as a huge fireball comes roaring down, their Golden Retriever comes bounding in just two feet from the flames, and they're all perfectly all right.
Also, if the download is 99% complete, you will not get the file period. You won't get 99% of the data you wanted, you won't get any.Kanastrous wrote:No matter how complex or multi-layered any encrypted system is, there's always a way to "work around it" and get to the file you want -
- although regardless of file size or the media you're copying to, the copy process can only be done from a terminal in the bad guy's office, and the bad guy will always walk in within three seconds of the download's completion.
Yeah, but I really think a super-spy agency gunning for files crucial to saving the world would have a better IT setup than WindowsThis isn't necessarily unrealistic; some fucktarded programs will actually delete the temporary data if interrupted before completion...
Go play Time Crisis 3. They have a scene where the two player characters happen upon a wrecked ship on the beach where they start out, and when they spot literally dozens of soldiers and several jeeps all charging at them, firing P90 submachine guns, stand there and agree to go into the ship to hide (keep in mind the soldiers are by this point a few dozen yards away), then start running.Stas Bush wrote:I hate when a person runs through a clear area, ducking, while dozens of people fire into that area with automatic assault rifles.
And the person is alive and unharmed, often.
That's downright moronic.
Though there are those moments when it's, just, you know, super.Zixinus wrote:Also, how characters show no subtle signs of pains after being injured (they either are wallowing in it and bitching about it, while telling you with the most unconvincing fashion that they are going to be ok) and are rarely ever crippled. They also appear to have a limitless amount of blood, as they are rarely ever concerned about, you know, bleeding to death.
Or the file system may do transactional writes.Destructionator XIII wrote:This isn't necessarily unrealistic; some fucktarded programs will actually delete the temporary data if interrupted before completion...PeZook wrote:Also, if the download is 99% complete, you will not get the file period. You won't get 99% of the data you wanted, you won't get any.
Ah, yes, CSI and their infinite-resolution CCDs. It doesn't matter how much your target was moving, how poor the shot was, or how far away the picture was taken from, you can still zoom/sharpen the picture enough to see every zit on the target's face.hongi wrote:I hate the high-techcomputer systems that zero into a person's face. Y'know, those narrowing squares that clears up the part you want to see. It's used waaaay too much.