Re: Star Trek/Star Wars STGOD?
Posted: 2009-05-04 07:50am
I believe you mean 1:4:1.
Get your fill of sci-fi, science, and mockery of stupid ideas
http://stardestroyer.dyndns-home.com/
I'm just a little bit nervous about making the rules to complicated. I'm sure I'm not the only person here who prefers simpler rules. Of course, I also know from experience that this is something that gets argued over every time one of these starts, so meh.Coyote wrote:I'd be more'n happy to share the rulesets I developed from the SBcom version. It's been running for about 5 years now so it reflects 5 years worth of "things that came up that need adjudication", though-- fair warning!![]()
I can also share the ship lists we came up with, showing costs of ships by points, and how long they take to build, and a cost estimate. We were going to track some economics in the game, but never got around to it because no one wants to play "Accounting Tycoon".
The way I tend to look at rules/game mods and the like is that they're there as a sort of arbiter, or last resort. Granted some of them are more first string (ie: no build spam!) but insofar as combat and the like goes, the main method should be cooperation with the players. But if that doesn't work - and let's be realistic here, we all know it doesn't 100% of the time, especially for "Major" battles - the rules/mods are a good fallback option.The Romulan Republic wrote:I'm just a little bit nervous about making the rules to complicated. I'm sure I'm not the only person here who prefers simpler rules. Of course, I also know from experience that this is something that gets argued over every time one of these starts, so meh.
Other than that one concern though, sounds good.
Nothing you've told me here I couldn't have worked out for myself. I think the importance of rules, at least beyond basics, is somewhat overrated, as even with rules it ultimately comes down to the intelligence and integrity of the players, and without that, the game's screwed either way.RogueIce wrote:The way I tend to look at rules/game mods and the like is that they're there as a sort of arbiter, or last resort. Granted some of them are more first string (ie: no build spam!) but insofar as combat and the like goes, the main method should be cooperation with the players. But if that doesn't work - and let's be realistic here, we all know it doesn't 100% of the time, especially for "Major" battles - the rules/mods are a good fallback option.The Romulan Republic wrote:I'm just a little bit nervous about making the rules to complicated. I'm sure I'm not the only person here who prefers simpler rules. Of course, I also know from experience that this is something that gets argued over every time one of these starts, so meh.
Other than that one concern though, sounds good.
Because without rules or the like, you can get the neverending arguments over a battle that kill games, or have players walk off in disgust.
Maybe we could use some of the core rules to help setup our own game, but I agree with The Romulan Republic, we don't want to complicate things too much. Keep it simple and work out problems as they come along. I know I don't want to play a game of economics, numbers and math. SD.net World gives me enough problems with that already.Coyote wrote:I'd be more'n happy to share the rulesets I developed from the SBcom version. It's been running for about 5 years now so it reflects 5 years worth of "things that came up that need adjudication", though-- fair warning!![]()
I can also share the ship lists we came up with, showing costs of ships by points, and how long they take to build, and a cost estimate. We were going to track some economics in the game, but never got around to it because no one wants to play "Accounting Tycoon".
Please do post these rules, or at least a link to them. It should good food for thought if nothing else.Coyote wrote:I'd be more'n happy to share the rulesets I developed from the SBcom version. It's been running for about 5 years now so it reflects 5 years worth of "things that came up that need adjudication", though-- fair warning!![]()
I can also share the ship lists we came up with, showing costs of ships by points, and how long they take to build, and a cost estimate. We were going to track some economics in the game, but never got around to it because no one wants to play "Accounting Tycoon".
What's the state of Coruscant? Is it still around, or was it given a Base Delta Zero or something?Coyote wrote:Here was what I had:
STAR WARS: REBUILDING of EMPIRES RULES
It is a period of uncertainty in the Galaxy.
After the rebirth of the CLONE EMPEROR at BYSS, all the major remnant factions of the GALACTIC EMPIRE came together to assault the fledgeling NEW REPUBLIC. All Major characters were killed in a dramatic assault on CORUSCANT, years ago.
Left behind were many smaller Factions of worlds that banded together for mutual security. Some tried to rebuild the EMPIRE; some tried to rebuild REPUBLICS; some tried to re-ignite the SEPERATISTS; while some remained INDEPENDENT.
Now, these Factions try to survive in an uncertain future, where politics, wars, diplomacy and brinksmanship could determine survival for the GALAXY...
I'm mostly fine with this, though I would point out that people complained when I set the limit to one major world and ten colonies. Some people may find four worlds, with a maximum of 2,400 points, to be too little. Unless we lower the point value of units, but if we do that then some units will likely be worth only a decimal point apiece (maybe that's fine though).HOW TO START A FACTION:
You start with a maximum of 4 worlds in an area that have decided to band together to protect themselves from the mean ol' Galaxy. You're encouraged to look up the worlds in Wookiepedia and find out about them so you can make informative, in-depth and in-character posts (ie, it would not go over well to claim a planet that is mostly desert and try to say that it's got lots of oceans and lush jungles, for example).
Who is the arbiter if their is a disagreement over the point value of a world? Their are a lot of worlds in canon, and there is a lot of inconsistant canon. Granted, this will likely be an issue with any system of rules we use.Once you pick your planets, we determine a point value for them.
Sounds good.CLASSES:
Homeworld- 600 pts.
Major----- 400 pts.
Average--- 200 pts.
Minor----- 100 pts.
Colony---- 50 pts.
A major homeworld, like Corellia or Coruscant (or of another major, space-faring species) is worth 600 points. (A "major, space-faring species" means a sentient species that has achieved faster-than-light travel on its own --so, like, Ewoks or Jawas don't count since, though they may be intelligent species, they never developed space travel-- or much technology on their own at all).
"Major" worlds are worlds that may not be homeworlds to major species, but are large, high-population industrial giants. Your typical "city-world" will be like this, such as Eriadu or Druckenwell.
"Average" worlds are worlds that have sizeable and respectable populations, but have not covered the surface of their worlds in population. They may be popular or important, but they're not giants on the Galactic scene. Naboo, for example, is an "Average" world.
"Minor" worlds are worlds with self-sustaining population but very little real power or influence. Bespin would be like that.
"Colony" is a small world or space station that relies on contact with another world to keep going. Any large, industrial space station would be a Colony (but not an ordinary Golan defense platform-- you can't spam space stations to boost your points). Mining colonies like the one on Mustafar would fit in this category.
Given hyperspace speeds, why must worlds in a faction be near one another?Try to find a small cluster of worlds that are near each other, don't go picking all Homeworlds that are clear across the Galaxy from one another. Have a good, clear reason why these worlds banded together, especially if they're a mix of, say, former Imperial and Republic worlds.
What about ships that are sold on the civilian or black market (transports, probably obsolete fighters, Corrillean Corvette all come to mind)?---
Decide if you want your government to be Imperial, Republic, Seperatist, or Independent in nature. That will also determine what types of ships you can start out with.
What about purchasing extra ground units/planetary defences beyond what's available on your ships/stations?Put your worlds together and add them up. The resulting number of points is what you use to buy ships with.
Ship Construction List
The list here spells out which ships are accepted as canon for this game. Custom designs and cross-overs from other universes are NOT permitted.
How does that effect the ship's point value, if at all? Does it cost us if we mod a ship mid-game?SHIP RULES:
1. Minor Ship mods are allowed: Straight out swaps should be alright, for example: Trading a turbolaser for a shield generator or an ion cannon, one-for-one. Modification such as this can only be performed on military craft. Warships can also be converted into the civilian ships by stripping them of weapons.
Does this mean there's a rule against attacking civilian vessels?2. Putting weapons on Civilian Ships: Some civilian ships carry weapons to protect themselves from pirates. But if you mount too many weapons on a civilian ship, it is no longer considered a civilian ship, but a combat ship, and open to attack from hostile navies.
I'd think weapons power is more important than weapons numbers. A ship with one heavy turbolaser is much more menacing a combatant than a ship with fifty kiloton-level point-defence guns. Also, this could be tricky, since "find a military ship close to the same size" means very little. An Interdictory Frigate, if I recall, is rather lightly armed for its size, etc. But maybe leaving it open is a good thing.Determine how big your civilian ship is, and find a military ship close to the same size. Count the number of weapons on the military ship and divide by 10. The resulting number is how many weapons you can place on your civilian ship. If you go over that number, then it is no longer considered a civilian ship but a military vessel.
This seems rather arbitrary and needless. What does it matter if a ship is called a police ship or not? Its how its used that matters. So why not let someone call their vessels police ships if they wish? Players will still react to them based on their capabillities, and they'll still have the same capabilities. I guess what I'm saying is, why do we need a sepperate, artificial class for police ships?3. Police/Customs/Border Patrol/Enforcement Ships: Police ships are calculated using the same points system used for Navy ships, and with a difference-- Police ships are meant to CAPTURE, not DESTROY, their targets. At least 50% of the weapons on a Police vessel must be Ion Cannons and/or Tractor Beams. Police Ship fleets must be made up of at least 50% Corvettes or Frigates, and nothing larger than a Cruiser class is allowed (so, no "Police Star Destroyers").
While given the limitations on planet numbers I doubt anyone could afford them, why make it a solid ban? Its not like such weapons are all that rare in Star Wars.4. No plantary scale weaponry/'superweapons' on any sort of ship or station.
Agreed completely. Or just not allow any at all.5. Any new weapons development and technology need to passed through one of the Mods
How do we determine when six months have passed in-game? Is this real time? Because that poses its own problems if, say, someone can't post for a few days.6. 6 game months development time for the above-mentioned modifications.
Same issues as above.7. 12 game months development time for new ships.
So if a player designates a vessel a "police ship," it can't be cloaked regardless of the laws of their faction or the points they invest in it? Why?8. Cloaking Devices for fighters are VERY expensive. You cannot equip entire fleets or wings of fighters with cloaks. At most a faction can equip 1 cloaked fighter squadron for every 1 major planet or above they have represented in their OOB. Police fighters do not have cloaks.
Not too bad, but really, why not allow people to have whatever ships they want? Aren't most ships produced by private companies for sale? What about captured ships? In a time of galactic chaos such as the backstory suggests, wouldn't a lot of fleets be scraped together out of whatever was available? Really, this is one place I think we could simplify things by just scrapping a rule.9. If you build ships from another political faction (ie, Republic trying to build or buy Imperial ships), then take the base cost of the ship (in either time or points), divide by half, and add that half to the base cost again. So a 10 point ship will cost you 15 points if it is from another faction. The only exception is Independent ships, which can be built by anyone at their base cost. Independent faction owners, however, must pay the "cost + half" for importing a Seperatist, Imperial or Republic ship.
That last sounds a tad overpriced for realism, but if a case can be made that it helps playability, fine. Otherwise, no comment.Codes for ships:
+ means you may not start out with one of these, but can acquire it later.
* means that the design is owned by a particular faction, and you must ask for the plans before you can build it.
$ means that the design can only be operated by members of a particular species; you can modify them for x2 the cost.
Ok, except that because a battle might take days to play out in, and players might go a few days without posting, and then a month has gone by while a fleet was crossing between two systems and fighting a single battle.7 real days = One game month
Every 4 real-time months = 1 game year
Sounds ok.Building or Buying Ships:
In order to build ships, you need shipyards. Shipyards come in four standard types: Imperial; Republic; Seperatist, and Independent. Building Shipyards costs points, just like building ships does.
Sounds fine.Imperial standard is the most common type since the Empire had shipyards all over the Galaxy to suit their needs. Many areas retained independent shipyard facilities so the Empire could not easily adapt their yards if they were captured.
How much more? And how do you determine weather you have enough crew for a ship? You didn't list any rules about population or military size. Also, ships are built instantaneously, or do they take time to build?Buying ships cost money and you have to have it accounted for somehow. You get the ship 'right now' but you also have to find a crew 'right now' or it sits in the yards for at least 3-4 months while waiting for crews. You can also buy Droid crewers or Clone crewers from various factions around the Galaxy, but it costs more money.
What's the diference if cost, if any, between building and buying?Whether building or Buying, use common sense. A faction of 2-6 worlds is not going to have the tax or industry base to suddenly purchase or build 300 Star Destroyers. A typical start-up faction will have 1-6 worlds, a small fleet of up to two-dozen (24) ships, and up to 10 shipyards of various sizes, either Imperial or Independent.
And more resources. Also, what is the purpose of this rule? I don't know if it does any harm besides adding another rule, but does it do any good?There are advantages to staying small: Factions with less than 10 worlds can shave 1 month off of build times. Larger factions have more bureacracy, worker shortages, and other headaches to deal with.
Requiring the player to build at least ten shipyards seems needless and arbitrary.EXAMPLE: Let's start with a faction:
Player Bob decides to start an Imperial faction, which he's named The Stellar Empire.
Planet Alpha: Homeworld, 600 points.
Planet Beta: Major Planet, 400 points.
Planet Ceti: Average Planet, 200 points.
Planet Gamma: Minor Planet, 100 points.
Add them together: Bob has 1,300 points to spend to outfit his fleet for The Stellar Empire.
Bob goes to the Shiplist and picks Imperial ships to start with. He must buy at least 10 shipyards-- they can be the smaller, cheaper ones to save points, but if he does that, then he'll have to spend the time to build larger yards later. Or, he can buy bigger shipyards, and start with a smaller fleet.
Do you have a list of what each unit is worth? What happens when a player chooses an obscure but canon unit that's not on the list? Also, what about units like a fighter squadron or an infantry regiment that might be worth decimal point values on this system?Bob buys:
1 1000 meter shipyard: 130 points each for 130 points.
2 800 meter shipyards: 100 points each for 200 points.
7 200 meter shipyards: 70 points each for 490 points.
2 Imperial-II Star Destroyers: 12 points apiece for 48 points.
8 Victory-II Star Destroyers: 8 points apiece for 64 points
50 Gladiator Cruisers: 5 points apiece for 250 points.
Bob has spent 1,182 points so far. He has 118 points left. So he buys one Golan-III defense station for each world.
4 Golan-III stations: 14 points each for 56 points.
In addition to my previous points regarding limiting what ships are available, I observe that the abillity to do so would presume that the game ran quite a long time. How long do most STGODs run?Bob has 62 points left. He's always liked the Katana Dreadnought and wants to buy some, but the Katana Dreadnought is listed as a Republic, not an Imperial design. So he has to look up the cost of the Katana Dreadnought that's listed, and add half the value again since it is a non-standard ship for his Imperial-designed shipyards.
A basic Republic Katana-class Dreadnought is 4 points. Half of 4 is 2, so he adds 2 + 4 = 6. Because he is an Imperial shipbuilder trying to build a Republic ship, it will cost him 6 points per Katana Dreadnought. Bob decides to go ahead and start with 5 of them.
5 Katana Dreadnoughts at 6 points apiece: 30 points.
If Bob wants to build Katana Dreadnoughts in the future, the cost of time works out the same way. It will take him 12 months instead of the listed 8 months (half of 8 is 4; 8 + 4 = 12). If Bob wants to get more Dreadnoughts in the future, without paying the penalty, he'll have to build a Republic Shipyard to do it. But guess what? The same rules apply for shipyards: take the amount of time required to build the shipyards, and add half the time again. So it'll take a long time in-game to build the required shipyards, but then once he's done, he can build Katana Dreadnoughts with no penalty at all.
Not to press the point too strongly, but why not dump the polics hips catagory?Bob has 32 points left, and buys some Police ships:
16 IPV-1 Patrol ships at 2 points each: 32 points.
What about ground troops?SUMMARY:
Bob buys:
1 1000 meter shipyard: 130 points each for 130 points.
2 800 meter shipyards: 100 points each for 200 points.
7 200 meter shipyards: 70 points each for 490 points.
2 Imperial-II Star Destroyers: 12 points apiece for 48 points.
8 Victory-II Star Destroyers: 8 points apiece for 64 points
50 Gladiator Cruisers: 5 points apiece for 250 points.
4 Golan-III stations: 14 points each for 56 points.
5 Katana Dreadnoughts at 6 points apiece: 30 points (higer cost for non-Imperial design).
31 IPV-1 Patrol ships at 2 points each: 32 points.
Total: 1300 points. Bob broke even.
Fair enough; weapons tech tends to be more standardized and lack craziness like transporters. However, that might also make rules simpler and/or battles less confusing/likely to breakdown into technobable bickering.Shinn Langley Soryu wrote:I'm perfectly willing to play in either setting, so whatever the rest of you choose, I'll gladly go along with it. However, the only problem I can see with a Star Wars STGOD is that I'd be significantly more limited in my equipment choices.
Actually, I was thinking more along the lines of ship, starfighter, and speeder types. For instance, if I'm playing an independent faction and want to field Star Wars versions of the VF-25 Messiah outfitted with turbolasers and concussion missiles instead of just using Z-95 Headhunters, Howlrunners, or Cloakshapes, I should be allowed to do so.The Romulan Republic wrote:Fair enough; weapons tech tends to be more standardized and lack craziness like transporters. However, tha might also make rules simpler and/or battles less confusing/likely to breakdown into technobable bickering.Shinn Langley Soryu wrote:I'm perfectly willing to play in either setting, so whatever the rest of you choose, I'll gladly go along with it. However, the only problem I can see with a Star Wars STGOD is that I'd be significantly more limited in my equipment choices.
Yes, I'd prefer to allow custom ships. I can see the possible issues with determining the point value of custom ship relative to canon ships though. So I'm a bit conflicted on this point.Shinn Langley Soryu wrote:Actually, I was thinking more along the lines of ship, starfighter, and speeder types. For instance, if I'm playing an independent faction and want to field Star Wars versions of the VF-25 Messiah outfitted with turbolasers and concussion missiles instead of just using Z-95 Headhunters, Howlrunners, or Cloakshapes, I should be allowed to do so.
8 people and 12 votes.The Romulan Republic wrote: Also, for those keeping count, we've got about 8 people now, so we're getting close to the minimum of ten mentioned earlier. So hopefully we can start as soon as we've worked out any issues with the rules.
True. Its not a big issue for me.DarthShady wrote:Bringing in custom ships just complicates the rules, unnecessarily I might add. It's a Star Wars or Star Trek STGOD, there's plenty of ships to chose from in either setting, no need to import ships from other stuff. I see no problem with modifying existing ships though.
To you people out their (you know who you are): stop messing up the poll!8 people and 12 votes.That's why I said everyone should post their choice.
I voted for the Star Wars Option, as if this gets off the ground, and past a few rounds of arguments over the rules, I would likely jump in and see if I could join.DarthShady wrote:8 people and 12 votes. :lol: That's why I said everyone should post their choice.
Fucking RogueIce and his army of poll breaking henchmen.The Romulan Republic wrote: To you people out their (you know who you are): stop messing up the poll!
Yeah, but If you want to play it's nice to post and show your interest, otherwise you're just one of those guys. See above.Karmic Knight wrote:I voted for the Star Wars Option, as if this gets off the ground, and past a few rounds of arguments over the rules, I would likely jump in and see if I could join.