Mr Bean wrote:First Kazuaki if you notice I rebuttted more than just you in there thats what that first part refers to
Then next time, PLEASE put it in the section for Gnome to avoid confusion, or just use two posts - you can pad your post count that way
As Corran was nice to Demostrate you don't have to fly Strait for a Bombing Run
Still the fact remains you have no evidance of a Tractor being able to hold a Manvoring Fighter
It is generally BEST if you fly straight, but certainly you don't have to. Accuracy generally suffers due to reduced accuracy of initial guidance from internal ship systems, but sure, you can do it.
Don't try and Tecno-babble it away its very clear what he did
He came to a full and complete stop, Also helping me prove my point that Tractors are not all that accurate
I know it is techo-babble, but nevertheless, he managed to somehow induce a delta-v that is GREATER than what his engines could normally provide. He might have pushed his engine to 1000% or whatever, but it was not Normal Full. He had been accelerating for some time now in general. Do YOU think that normal full reverse would cause "a scream of horribly stressed electronics" or nearly blow out the hyperdrive, or stop several seconds of high speed maneuvering in what apparently is one second?
The tractor beam lockon parameter does not normally plan for such high delta-vs. If the system's not designed for it, it would lose the lock.
Never directly blamed his Boss? His boss who was in charge of Training him?
He blaimed his boss and did not take responsbility for his actions THUS Thrawns line about a mistake only becomes and Error if you refuse to correct it
Had he said I screwed up such as the other guy who probably would have lived, Instead he tried to cover his ass and Thrawn had him killed.
It is a mutual compound. You assume that he could never have told the difference. IF that is true, then his statement "I was never properly trained for such an occurrence" will not be a lie or a way to shift responsibility. It is the TRUTH. It is the fault of the system, not him or his officer in particular. Sure, it could be put more diplomatically, but the man isn't a cultured officer. He's a conscript from god knows where. He should not be killed. He goofed, but one cannot be faulted just for not being to create an improvisation every day on the spot.
Even if he said flat out, "Ensign Colclazure never taught me how to do this" If the statement is true, then it is STILL OK.
But, if his statement is false, and he SHOULD have been properly trained, then he LIED and tried to shift responsibility. That lying SOB is an error that has to be eliminated. It is an error to have taught that asshole anything in the first place.
He did not Stop he moved in a strait line why the Tractor got him and yes he was Evading after he broke free but he had to have stoped and leveled out to go on into Hyperspace or do you want to dispute everything from the Movies down to WEG where a ship most level out for a controled Hyperspace jump(Bacta War for example Corran Says that as long as a Ship is Jinking it can't go to Lightspeed but must remain in level flight)
And besides it quite nicley explains how Luke managed to get hit if he is after all the best pilot in the galaxy as you claim that explains how he got hit at all
I meant STOPPED EVASIVE MANEUVERING.
The man isn't even fully out of the Interdictor cone yet at that time. Jinking tends to disrupt the navicomputer's operation, because it constantly changes your vector and speed. But Luke is just telling R2D2 to take him anywhere. He can keep jinking till the elongation part without disrupting anything.
Yes, a CONTROLLED HYPERSPACE JUMP does require stabilization, but Luke clearly told R2 to screw a navicomputer solution or direction.
It is far too early for him to stop while he is still in the cone. The BOOK strongly implies the second time, he was jinking right up to the time when he was finally out of the cone and R2's warble came. Why would he not do that the first time, eh?
EU mentions the Cannon has a slow firing rate and did not support all the Transports(Flying of the planet from one spot makes it rather easy to shoot them down)
It may not have supported ALL the transports, but that's still way from saying that it supported no one except the first. And some may even be all equipment transports.
Its also true that a Non-Moving Target is much easier to Disable than a moving one yet we don't see them doing that do we?
If you have a stable firing solution, you can either choose to lay a tractor onto it, OR you can choose to lay a gun on it. For disabling, I'll lay a gun. Even if I use a tractor, I'll STILL have to disable it with fire to make sure my shuttles don't get blasted as I close in.
First kindly define FCS as its not a term I'm familiar with and second you say that but agian
You have no proof
FCS has two definitions. Fire Control System and Fire Control Solution. Generally, the context tells you which one is it. There is no firm proof, BUT it is logical.
Face it the point is simple if Tractors could grap Fighters then the Rebel Allance would not have lasted very long, The Fighters at Yavin 4 flew right AT the Tracotors and yet where not touched. Any ISD could easly hold of a few Squadrens of Fighters by pinning them in place and destroying them with point defense yet we never EVER see them doing this
They can hold ONE squadron, MAX. They only have ten tractor projectors, remember?
This is a pitiful false dilemma. Generally, SW tracking systems as a WHOLE are marginal against starfighters. Between how small they are, the ECM they put out and their evasive maneuvering - well, in fact, a smuggler-grade set might be no help at all, as suggested in the Hutt Gambit when Han tells them that they have to aim at TIEs by eye rather than sensor.
But it does not mean it is impossible to knock down or lock up a starfighter, does it?
Here's the basic solution set. There are actually very few circumstances when a tractor beam is worth that much in battle.
If you can get a positive lock on something small, like a starfighter, then what would you rather to shoot at it with. A tractor, or a gun. Most starfighter pilots aren't worth the capture. You'll probably choose the gun.
As for larger ships, they ALREADY have a positive lock all the time. If they have a positive lock all the time, the tractor's value becomes marginal.
For kills, tractor beams are of marginal usefulness. Only for the occasional capture attempt are they truly useful. In fact, Pellaeon had to make a special order for tractors in SOTE.