Re: Can you forcible transport away *only part* of something
Posted: 2013-10-26 05:00pm
Star Trek 4.bilateralrope wrote:What other evidence is there about transporter use on a cloaked ship ?
Get your fill of sci-fi, science, and mockery of stupid ideas
http://stardestroyer.dyndns-home.com/
Star Trek 4.bilateralrope wrote:What other evidence is there about transporter use on a cloaked ship ?
And this is something that isn't disallowed.biostem wrote: Why no one thought to use one of the shuttle's independent transporters to save them both is beyond me...
Federation ships are powered by anti-matter. Which means that if it is possible to breach it with a hand phaser, the result will be a large explosion.biostem wrote:Have we ever seen an example where the self destruct mechanism to a ship was disabled, and the crew resorted to trying to detonate it with a hand phaser? I mean, the Romulans were able to capture Prometheus, (that ship that could split into 3 pieces), without that happening...
tezunegari wrote:We do see the transporter in action, even the effect it causes, during the battle Ent-E vs Ruafo. The screen went white for a second and none of the bridge crew where aware of being transported. Until the sensor guy told Ruafo that there is no change in the radiation readings of the rings.biostem wrote:I'd also like to mention that in Insurrection, that holo-ship seemed to be equipped with some sort of special transporter system which would have been able to seemlessly transport the entire town over to the environment inside it, (although we never see it work for any kind of confirmation of this).
Batman wrote:Um-where do you get the multiple simultaneous transports from? And people's reaction to being transported without notice is usually 'Where the fuck are we'. What, exactly, do you think they should have done to prevent being transported?
Which I'm afraid doesn't do beans to address the multiple simultaneous transports aspect of my question? And since you said the transportee's 'wouldn't even have time to react' I sort of assumed you did expect them to have time to react (and presumably do something to prevent it) when at least to my knowledge the only time that ever worked was TNG's Roga Danar. Every other time if you're transported, you're transported, and if you don't want to be, sucks to be you.biostem wrote:Just as the person I quoted pointed out, the Enterprise crew managed to transport the Son'a crew over to a holographic re-creation of their ship, without them knowing.Batman wrote:Um-where do you get the multiple simultaneous transports from? And people's reaction to being transported without notice is usually 'Where the fuck are we'. What, exactly, do you think they should have done to prevent being transported?
Batman wrote:Which I'm afraid doesn't do beans to address the multiple simultaneous transports aspect of my question? And since you said the transportee's 'wouldn't even have time to react' I sort of assumed you did expect them to have time to react (and presumably do something to prevent it) when at least to my knowledge the only time that ever worked was TNG's Roga Danar. Every other time if you're transported, you're transported, and if you don't want to be, sucks to be you.biostem wrote:Just as the person I quoted pointed out, the Enterprise crew managed to transport the Son'a crew over to a holographic re-creation of their ship, without them knowing.Batman wrote:Um-where do you get the multiple simultaneous transports from? And people's reaction to being transported without notice is usually 'Where the fuck are we'. What, exactly, do you think they should have done to prevent being transported?
gigabytelord wrote:Quick interjection here but wasn't there an episode in DS9 where someone on the station had some sort of parasite or growth in his brain and Dr. Bashir beamed it out of his head without hurting him?
IIRC the good doctor beamed the damned thing directly onto a small shielded pad in the same room. Can't remember all the details sorry.
Sadly, no to this question. It was more based on a rant I had w/ a friend about how stupid characters in many shows are, in that they don't use the resources at hand in any sort of creative way. We ended up agreeing that it was "necessary stupidity" in order to not have most plots resolved in about 5 minutes...seanrobertson wrote: One more question: was this topic inspired by a "Breaking Bad" character's meth-fueled pitch for a Star Trek episode?![]()
TNG "Unification": A Klingon BOP orbiting Romulus is able to transport Picard and Data back and forth without being detected.Prometheus Unbound wrote:Star Trek 4.bilateralrope wrote:What other evidence is there about transporter use on a cloaked ship ?
How he accomplished that trick wasn't explained, AFAIK.seanrobertson wrote:A few other observations and a question mixed in:
When that Vidiian scientist split B'Elanna into distinct Klingon and human halves, did that involve a transporter?
Which indicates some kind of interference with obtaining a transporter lock. They needed to "tag" the target, much like the Son'a needed tags in ST:I.seanrobertson wrote:To beam a transwarp coil out of a Borg sphere, the Voyager crew had to disable internal shielding with small bombs and place a beacon directly onto the coil to nab it.
Ted C wrote:How he accomplished that trick wasn't explained, AFAIK.seanrobertson wrote:A few other observations and a question mixed in:
When that Vidiian scientist split B'Elanna into distinct Klingon and human halves, did that involve a transporter?
Which indicates some kind of interference with obtaining a transporter lock. They needed to "tag" the target, much like the Son'a needed tags in ST:I.seanrobertson wrote:To beam a transwarp coil out of a Borg sphere, the Voyager crew had to disable internal shielding with small bombs and place a beacon directly onto the coil to nab it.
Presumably the same way that it beamed Roga Danar out of his little shuttle without beaming up the pilot's seat, console, and assorted other matter in the cockpit. My hypothesis is that the "transporter effect" envelopes a target based on some kind of boundary condition that the field follows. That's why they can beam up things that they can't see (or can't see clearly) with their sensors: they don't need to see it, they just need to know where it is. A "transport inhibitor" somehow obscures the target's location, so they can't get a lock. "Pattern enhancers", "isolinear tags", transporter armbands, and working (friendly) communicators can all help a transporter lock on to the target's location.biostem wrote:Your second point, IMO, kinda touches on one of my original points of confusion about transporters in general - even with a tag, how does the transporter determine where the transwarp coil begins, and the rest of the assembly ends? Does the tag convey some sort of mass or volume reading back to the transporter system? If I used a tag on a person's shirt, could I choose to beam away the whole person, just their shirt, or even just their torso?Ted C wrote:Which indicates some kind of interference with obtaining a transporter lock. They needed to "tag" the target, much like the Son'a needed tags in ST:I.seanrobertson wrote:To beam a transwarp coil out of a Borg sphere, the Voyager crew had to disable internal shielding with small bombs and place a beacon directly onto the coil to nab it.