





Moderator: Beowulf
Obviously this is only the construction of an elaborate deception structure, after the completion of which you will commence construction of the actual bunker underneath its roof. Just flush all the dirt down the toilet and keep your faucet going.Starglider wrote:It's out with the structural engineer now, so we'll get to see how good my guesses were on the support calcs. Of course I would need at least 10 times more concrete and rebar to meet the minimum Heavy Armor Brigade standards for a potting shed.
Octagonal rebar pattern, good point, I will check.madd0ct0r wrote:The holes in the slab and sump will need some extra tie bars. Just make sure the contractor puts them in.
No they are standard RSJs. The structural engineer may well specify additional beams, we shall see.madd0ct0r wrote:Are the ceiling beams designed to work compositely with the ceiling slab? If not, for the weight of concrete and planter above them, I'd expect a third. I've not done any calcs here, that's just a gut feeling. The beam directly under the planter might well take the weight, but you are relying on the slab to take the across section moment and provide buckling restraint for imbalances and then 2nd order effects (slightly off balanced creates moment which deflects strucutre to be slightly more off balance und so weiter). Bloody planters weigh a tonne, and you have to account for when they inevitably fill up with water during a storm too.
Ah, well the elevations were done for planning permission and I didn't mention that I was actually building the evil computer bunker from Superman 3 when I submitted the planning. If they ask I'll just say 'oh, buildings control insisted on lots of ventilation'. The caps won't actually look like that anyway, it's just a placeholder.Your dome cap ventshrooms need adding to the elevation drawings.
Depends on how generous the builder was being with the egress opening. The IRC requires an opening of 5.7 s.f. (IRC R310.2.1), with an exception for grade/below at 5 s.f. They also need a 9 s.f. (3'x3') minimum well outside the window (R310.2.3).Sea Skimmer wrote:Around here alot of the recent surge of cheap housing construction does basement access via a corrugated half pipe on top of a piece of slab, with a ladder mounted on it and a metal grate on top. Access to the inside being a small door, though it varies and some are more big windowlike.
The wife wants it to be a home rainforest sauna. I will accept this proposal only if the controls can be locked into an inexorably rising steam temperature, enough to cause certain death in 7 to 9 minutes; unless said individual happens to have a concealed gadget that can shatter the perspex dome above. Still working on the witty one liner for this.Eternal_Freedom wrote:I'm trying to work out if you're contemplating adding an observatory/lounge or an artillery position. Maybe you should see if you can find a de-milled Bofors or something to make it authentic.
How easy are demilled Bofors and such to come by in the UK anyway?Starglider wrote:The wife wants it to be a home rainforest sauna. I will accept this proposal only if the controls can be locked into an inexorably rising steam temperature, enough to cause certain death in 7 to 9 minutes; unless said individual happens to have a concealed gadget that can shatter the perspex dome above. Still working on the witty one liner for this.Eternal_Freedom wrote:I'm trying to work out if you're contemplating adding an observatory/lounge or an artillery position. Maybe you should see if you can find a de-milled Bofors or something to make it authentic.
Ideally the roof dome would be retractable, for launching drones, sounding rockets, and with, an elevating hydralic platform, death rays.
No, the previous design had the eastern intakes literally in the outermost part of the hedge, because the gap between them and the building had to be wide enough for a wheelchair-accessible side path. The disguisting biophiles and foliage fetishists at the local authority did not specifically authorise this and would no doubt complain about the violation of their precious fronds. More importantly, I'd have to unlink and remove some of the protection barriers and that's a real pain in the ass now that they're weighted down with many tonnes of water ballast.Sea Skimmer wrote:The machine is too wide digging I take it, and you wanted to dig directly against the trees?
Intriguing idea but alas not practical here, because the east side intakes and exhausts will be literally in the side path; need to have a flat at-grade high-grip-but-not-too-bumpy surface.You could also protect the air entrainment devices primary grate from the leaf enemy by covering it with a properly arranged pile of big rocks, optionally set around a length of preforated pipe. This is how the air intakes for nuclear bunkers are protected against the atomic debris surge. This also helps reduce the direct blast effects through drag loading before they go down the pipe. Might still fail in the face of enough leaves though.
Can you have a flat-plate cover over a trench that is wider than the path with gutters on either/one side? That way air can get under the path to the vent, but leaves and debris should stay properly out of the air system.Starglider wrote:Intriguing idea but alas not practical here, because the east side intakes and exhausts will be literally in the side path; need to have a flat at-grade high-grip-but-not-too-bumpy surface.
That sounds a bit restrictive and tricky to build.Me2005 wrote:Can you have a flat-plate cover over a trench that is wider than the path with gutters on either/one side? That way air can get under the path to the vent, but leaves and debris should stay properly out of the air system.
Yeah an easier option is put a fairly course mesh screen under the top of the grate, and denser screen box around the air intake, elevated above the bottom level. Something like that should be able to go a long time without cleaning normally, though fall heavy leaves all bets are off.Starglider wrote:That sounds a bit restrictive and tricky to build.Me2005 wrote:Can you have a flat-plate cover over a trench that is wider than the path with gutters on either/one side? That way air can get under the path to the vent, but leaves and debris should stay properly out of the air system.