Page 3 of 3
Posted: 2004-10-28 02:25pm
by Thirdfain
Oops, my bad...
Posted: 2004-10-30 05:34pm
by General Zod
found a couple more handy image hosts.
http://www.fapomatic.com - adult pic image host, for those naughty pics you can't host on imageshack.
http://www.paintedover.com - for non adult pics, similar to imageshack or photobucket.
Posted: 2005-09-11 07:41pm
by darthdavid
I'm now running a server so if anyone has any images or small files they need hosted just let me know. I won't host Pr0n, and I'm not hosting your 4 gig pirated movies so don't even think about sending anything stupid like that though. PM me for details if you need something hosted.
Posted: 2005-10-24 11:44pm
by Pu-239
Yeah, I can host a couple of small images/files as well.
Only SSL w/ a self signed cert, since I've placed the whole server under SSL, due to Cox's port restrictions (HTTPS runs on a different port), plus the need to transfer files securely to my friend going to VCU. I can put things under password protection too.
Posted: 2006-03-08 09:18pm
by Einhander Sn0m4n
I'm noticing that Imageshack is getting really slow, popup-ad-ridden, and unreliable. Worse: they're disabling hotlinking seemingly at random (which is the entire point of an image host!)
May we please use Photobucket or another host instead?
Posted: 2006-03-09 12:31am
by Beowulf
Einhander Sn0m4n wrote:I'm noticing that Imageshack is getting really slow, popup-ad-ridden, and unreliable. Worse: they're disabling hotlinking seemingly at random (which is the entire point of an image host!)
May we please use Photobucket or another host instead?
You may use any imagehost you wish.
Posted: 2006-03-18 12:33pm
by The Grim Squeaker
I'd reccomend
http://www.flickr.com for image collections, although it's not that good an image host as something like imageshack.
It does have an excellent upload limit (200 mb/s a month) and a very useful and reliable mass pic uploader.
I also have a pro account (2 gigs uplaoding per month) and I'll happily let almost anyone upload via my account, which I'll label with the tags:
"not my work", "Forum", and [if appropiate or needed] "quantification".
Anyone wanting to upload via my account (
www.flickr.com/ddofer ) can just PM, IM is e-mail me

Posted: 2006-09-08 03:00pm
by Einhander Sn0m4n
I'm withdrawing my recommendation of Photobucket due to their forced resizing of any image larger than a maximum of 1024x768. This might not hurt people who like their silly image macros, but it severely hurts people who regularly create large unresizeable pictures like starship schematics or pixel art.
Posted: 2006-09-18 12:06am
by Einhander Sn0m4n
And Photobucket gives us back the option to upload ANY SIZE image so long as its weight is under a megabyte. Consider my endorsement reinstated!
Posted: 2007-05-05 12:27am
by Einhander Sn0m4n
Imageshack's slowness problems are
getting noticed. They're also apparently
releasing personal info in violation of their own TOS for shits and giggles.
Just wanted to let everyone know.
Posted: 2007-07-28 06:42pm
by Einhander Sn0m4n
More Imageshack ragging: They've figured out how to attack a NoScripted Firefox with popup ads. How incredibly 1999 of them!

Posted: 2007-09-20 03:58pm
by Einhander Sn0m4n
Repost from HoS; minus the [EDIT: my] asshattery.
Einhander Sn0m4n wrote:Sample image is a 820x2250 (aka Very Large!) schematic of a thermonuclear railgun projectile, which, in the BMP file format, weighs 5.28MB on disk. This image was chosen to be representative of the output of an advanced MSPaint user in making a starship design. There are gradients and subtle color variations present within the schematic which are not present in the default Paint palette, as you can see. Most ship designers stick to the default Paint palette, which I suspect would give GIF an edge in this test.
The purpose of this experiment is to show which is the best file format to save a schematic of this type through a combination of file size, fidelity in rendition, and ease of data repair.
Schematic saved in MSPaint; default compression JPEG: 94kb; data damage apparent in form of smeared or blurry lines, edges, and fonts.
Schematic saved in Irfanview; default compression (85%) JPEG: 94kb; data damage slightly more visible.
Schematic saved in MSPaint; default compression GIF: 63kb; MASSIVE DAMAGE extremely obvious in the form of color dithering over very nearly the entirety of the schematic! File size is small for an image this size.
Schematic saved in Irfanview; default compression (85%) GIF: 139kb 
Data damage in form of color inaccuracy present, readily seen in the gray gradients. Large file size!
Schematic saved in Irfanview, default compression factor (7) PNG: 26kb! No data damage visible at all due to lossless format. File size is clearly the smallest by a factor of 2.6 to its nearest GIF competition and nearly 4 against the JPEGs.
Re: Pic hosting
Posted: 2008-11-02 09:46am
by ThePorkchopExpress
Actually, it hadnt occured to me till just now. But some of the art i posted in my other thread are hot linked from deviant art. Its actually where i hot most of my pics now since comcast nerfed their file uploading system to be unwieldly and lame. Not hard to upload.. just use the no catagory selection when they ask what type of "art" it is.
just right click on the image and copy image location..

Re: Pic hosting
Posted: 2009-02-25 04:44pm
by bozazz
If anyone wants to host pictures you can do it here on
my webpage. Originally I was going to just create ftp accounts manually but that seems a bit difficult to manage and there a limit to how many accounts I can create. Si since I like fooling around with php and databases I uploaded a script that I found online. You can manage all the photos and files that you upload on the site. I've set it so it will have unlimited storage space per account, and file sizes are unlimited. There is a 15gig bandwidth per month but I don't think anyone will reach it. If things really get bogged down I'll reduce the bandwidth accordingly, but thanks to yahoo it should be fine. Cheers
Re: Pic hosting
Posted: 2009-02-25 05:41pm
by bozazz
Sorry guys/gals if the link above doesn't work. I just changed the directory so the url is easier to remember.
Here it is. The change is final and it'll be there to stay. Cheers
Re: Pic hosting
Posted: 2009-04-22 01:48am
by SylasGaunt
*EDIT* Whoops, got my windows mixed up.