Page 3 of 3

Posted: 2003-11-24 01:08am
by Gandalf
Dorsk 81 wrote:
Gandalf wrote:
otter wrote:I'd only eat vegetarians, cause, you know, they're the least fatty.......

I can see the advertisements now.

"We only use the freshest farm raised corn feed humans!"
Mmm... corn.
Mmm... Gandalf. :twisted:
ROTFLMAO!

That's goin in the sig.

Posted: 2003-11-24 01:20am
by Dorsk 81
Gandalf wrote:
Dorsk 81 wrote:
Gandalf wrote: Mmm... corn.
Mmm... Gandalf. :twisted:
ROTFLMAO!

That's goin in the sig.
I'm getting good at note worthy quotes, first the "If his sex drive's as good as his boasting, we ought to do well" in refernce to Ein and now this, in the space of 3-4 days! :D

Note to self: When it becomes custom title time, seriously consider "Lord of the One Liners" :D

Posted: 2003-11-24 03:07am
by Companion Cube
Dorsk 81 wrote:I saw a bumper sticker once that said "Solve World Hunger-Eat Ethiopians" or something similar...
How do you solve all the world's problems? Get the hungry to eat the homeless!




Anyway, no. I would absolutely never eat human flesh unless I actually needed to.

Posted: 2003-11-24 04:36am
by The Kernel
Hmm. How shall I put this?

FUCK NO!

Posted: 2003-11-24 07:56am
by Boba Fett
The Kernel wrote:Hmm. How shall I put this?

FUCK NO!
I second that!!!

Disgusting... :x

Posted: 2003-11-24 12:22pm
by Knife
Blah, with all the crap humans eat. Eeuch. I mean, in survival school, I ate some Coyote and it was Nasty to say the least.

Humans are more or less scavengers like coyote's so I'd imagine the taste would be simular. Blah.Image

Posted: 2003-11-25 12:33am
by The Yosemite Bear
Well Squirrel and Raccoon have to be prepared just right to be anything patable. Now Someone explain to me why shit eaters like catfish, and shellfish and BBQed ants/beetles are so damn tasty though?

Posted: 2003-11-25 12:52am
by Rogue 9
Well, I don't know what you mean about squirrel. Had it, thought it was good. As for raccoons and other predators/scavengers, I've had this discussion before, although more dealing with an all-predator environment than cannibalism. :roll: The vitamins, fiber, and such from vegetable matter can only go through so many digestive tracts before it becomes worthless. You don't often see predators eating other predators, even of different species.

Case in point: Lions and cheetahs. A lion will kill a cheetah if he can in order to cut down on food competition, but he won't eat the cheetah. The reason is that there is little in another great cat's body to sustain him. A gazelle/zebra/whatever ate some grass. Fine. The cheetah caught the gazelle/zebra/whatever and ate it. Again, fine. The lion catches up with the cheetah and kills him. Now what?

The lion will not eat the cheetah. Why? Because all the nutrients in the cheetah's body have already been processed twice and are mostly depleted. The same goes for cannibalism of almost any species of itself. If a human ate another human, someone contended (in one of these threads, there are way too many) that a human body has everything another human needs. Not so. That human body has already used almost everything that another human would need out of his food. It would barely nourish another human at all. In fact, being human, it is more likely to have diseases that will affect another human than any given herbivore prey animal is. It is illogical, immoral, impractical, and unhealthy. Now are you still going to persist in this foolishness, or am I going to have to just start flaming?