Page 3 of 4
Posted: 2004-01-02 11:03pm
by Admiral Valdemar
Alyeska wrote:AV, stop bullshitting. SB only has 4,700 members. Of those 1,000 are reasonably active with another thousand being occasional viewers.
You hurt my little exaggerative ego.
Bar the numbers, the rest is true. Kier still won't do anything about it and there are still far more actives than dormants and that drags us down.
Viewers, of course, mean jack. I was viewing SB.com from late '99, posters are what we want.
Posted: 2004-01-03 12:02am
by Kuja
Frank Hipper wrote:Andrew J. wrote:Aww, your inflated ego is so cute! (In a completely platonic way, of course.

)
Inflated?
Do you have any concept of the difficulty I have in restraining myself sometimes?
How's that steel cage holding up?

Posted: 2004-01-03 02:28am
by Vertigo1
Frank Hipper wrote:OURS is the superior, do you think I'd spend so much time here if it wasn't?

Exactly...which is exactly why I still post here. You guys are far too much fun.

Posted: 2004-01-03 03:55am
by Uraniun235
I don't see Something Awful anywhere on there... wonder where they'd fit in.
Posted: 2004-01-03 05:00am
by Hethrir
oooh, RX-7 club...thanks

Posted: 2004-01-03 08:29am
by haas mark
Dahak wrote:I'm not a high-output poster, but it's funny to be on the third page of total posts

And there I was thinking I had a life...
#4. -coughcough-
~ver
Posted: 2004-01-03 08:37am
by Dahak
verilon wrote:Dahak wrote:I'm not a high-output poster, but it's funny to be on the third page of total posts

And there I was thinking I had a life...
#4. -coughcough-
~ver
That seems to depend on how you look at it...
If sorting the members list "Total posts, decending" it differs from "Total posts, ascending".
The first lists me on the thrid page, that latter on the fourth-last page...
Shouldn't it be equal, wether you sort ASC or DESC ?
Posted: 2004-01-03 08:42am
by haas mark
Dahak wrote:verilon wrote:Dahak wrote:I'm not a high-output poster, but it's funny to be on the third page of total posts

And there I was thinking I had a life...
#4. -coughcough-
~ver
That seems to depend on how you look at it...
If sorting the members list "Total posts, decending" it differs from "Total posts, ascending".
The first lists me on the thrid page, that latter on the fourth-last page...
Shouldn't it be equal, wether you sort ASC or DESC ?
No, because the last page is incomplete.
And I meant #4 poster. -ahem-
~ver
Posted: 2004-01-04 01:47am
by Asst. Asst. Lt. Cmdr. Smi
DPDarkPrimus wrote:Pu-239 wrote:Looks like I need to inflate my post count- I'm only on the 3rd or 4th page
Imagine my suprise at how high up on the list I am. Geez, I haven't been here THAT long, have I?
I'm surprised that I'm so low on the list (#24), relative to where I used to be (At least in the top 25). Of course, it doesn't matter how many posts you have, it's whether or not they're not spam. Unfortunately, I'm sure the other members have me beat there too.
Posted: 2004-01-04 02:03am
by SyntaxVorlon
verilon wrote:Dahak wrote:I'm not a high-output poster, but it's funny to be on the third page of total posts

And there I was thinking I had a life...
#4. -coughcough-
~ver
I am #98. Yay!
Well I must say, well done all around, SD.Net might actually get some good PR for once.
Posted: 2004-01-04 03:19am
by Vertigo1
SyntaxVorlon wrote:I am #98. Yay!
Well I must say, well done all around, SD.Net might actually get some good PR for once.
#100 here.

I enjoy posting here because I know I can say whatever the hell I want is on my mind and not have to worry about offending someone...though I'm member #409 (sing the jingle, and I'll bitchslap you into next week).

Posted: 2004-01-04 03:27am
by DPDarkPrimus
I always feel like such a nerd with no life when I see how high up on the list I am. I'm freaking #29, for crying out loud!
You need to go to #71 (RougeIce) to find someone who hadn't registered BEFORE me.
*simultaniously appaled and awed*
Posted: 2004-01-04 01:57pm
by haas mark
DPDarkPrimus wrote:I always feel like such a nerd with no life when I see how high up on the list I am. I'm freaking #29, for crying out loud!
You need to go to #71 (RougeIce) to find someone who hadn't registered BEFORE me.
*simultaniously appaled and awed*
Hey, hey, I registered in September. How do you think I look at it? o.O
Ein's the next one down that didn't register before me... but still..
~ver
Posted: 2004-01-04 02:12pm
by kojikun
#20.. AND I'm an early register.

Posted: 2004-01-04 02:22pm
by Wicked Pilot
Wow, I'm #57, and that's without inflation due to massive spam. (except for this post of course). Back in the day, the really early day, I got up to #20, but that was during the summer of '02, when I had nothing to do.
Posted: 2004-01-04 09:44pm
by RogueIce
DPDarkPrimus wrote:... (RougeIce) ...
*sigh*
Next person I see that gets the position of the G and the U in my name wrong again is gonna get it...
Posted: 2004-01-04 09:48pm
by The Cleric
RougeIce, you really need to stop being so nitpicky.
Gotcha

!!!
Posted: 2004-01-04 10:04pm
by RogueIce
StormTrooperTR889 wrote:RougeIce, you really need to stop being so nitpicky.
*decides to wait until
after STTR889 completes boot camp, because it would be
far more gratifying then*
Posted: 2004-01-04 10:08pm
by The Cleric
Why, are you a commissioned officer? Or will I have some understanding from basic?
Posted: 2004-01-04 10:30pm
by RogueIce
StormTrooperTR889 wrote:Why, are you a commissioned officer? Or will I have some understanding from basic?
Not an officer yet, but chances are good I'll outrank you anyway, unless you somehow make Lance Corporal.
Either way, in ~3 1/2 years, be afraid. Be
very afraid.

Posted: 2004-01-04 10:38pm
by kojikun
MoulinRougeIce wrote:Either way, in ~3 1/2 years, be afraid. Be
very afraid.

Why 3.5 years??
Posted: 2004-01-04 10:39pm
by The Cleric
I graduate college with an offered comission as 2nd Luitenant (bah, I know). But I don't have to take it, and I can be out from reserves in as little as 6 years total.
Posted: 2004-01-04 11:22pm
by Shogoki
StormTrooperTR889 wrote:Since we have 3 pages of 0 post members, and many many pages before any truely active members, we could be insanely high if Mike got rid of those accounts.
There are those of us who are very active lurkers, and have been so for a long time.
Posted: 2004-01-04 11:27pm
by The Cleric
Shogoki wrote:StormTrooperTR889 wrote:Since we have 3 pages of 0 post members, and many many pages before any truely active members, we could be insanely high if Mike got rid of those accounts.
There are those of us who are very active lurkers, and have been so for a long time.
I meant the people with 10 posts who have been here since last December category.
Posted: 2004-01-05 01:23am
by Shadowhawk
Ace Pace wrote:If there was a join date \ post rate table, I would be the lowest, im here since the 4th day the board was open, and I don't even have 700 posts!
I was the 30th person to join the board, and I just broke 300.
I'm apparently the oldest member with the lowest post count, among those who still post (only 6 people above me have fewer posts (and 4 of those have less than 20)).