Vympel wrote:In this thread I was concerned with his absolute canonical motivations only, not the aims displayed in the EU at a later time.
Purist nonsense is purist nonsense; especially when you phrase it exactly implying contradiction and overpowering by the ROTS data which predates Palpatine's late-Empire plans.

Backpeddle faster, hurry now.
Vympel wrote:If it's actually Palpatine and not some insane clone, yes, he can.
Well given every piece of evidence I've posted said emphatically they are one in the same, how about you back up your claim, fuckass?
You are not allowed to treat your personal pet agendas as default assumptions, asshole.
Vympel wrote:But the stuff from the EU should not be applied when talking about the films.
Vympel wrote:No, those were the motivations of a nutty clone. Palpatine's true motivations (RotS script/novel) were nowhere near something so deranged.
Suck cock. You know just as well as I do that you weren't answering that in a "well here's what the film has told us so far." Instead you give a 90% NOVELISATION response and place it in direct contention with the EU.
Come on now, I'm sure you can bring that backpeddle to a full sprint.
Vympel wrote:II was not responding to you when I wrote my opening post.
So? You still were implying ROTS novelisation shit contradicts plans Palpatine BEGINS to apply TWENTY FIVE FUCKING YEARS LATER. Do you think I'm a fucking idiot? I've only quoted exactly what you said.
Vympel wrote:My concerns, whenever I've posted on this subject, is to draw a clear line between absolute canon Palpatine and post-RotJ, EU Palpatine.
Well you're wrong. This isn't Scooter land, and for the purposes of truth within the scope of the Star Wars Saga, everything is equal until something from the EU contradicts something in the higher canon.
What you have produced does not meet the barest standard for that, and it complete horseshit. There is no "absolute canon Palpatine" from a rational analytical perspective. That is bullshit.
Vympel wrote:Previously, I've tried to make it clear that, for example, saying that a weak Vader is what Palpatine wanted because of *insert EU here* is pure bullshit. I didn't have this attitude before RotS, becuase I wasn't aware of RotS. When presented with new evidence, you change your conclusions!
Weak Vader has what to do with Palpatine's more grand plans once he's discovered a way to avoid death and has been educating and meditating on the dark side for twenty five years since ROTS? Apples and oranges.
Besides, saying Palpatine wants a weak Vader does consistute an explicit contradiction to the contents of ROTS. This is not the case with Palpatine's early plans and Palpatine's later, more developed plans.
Vympel wrote:Your evidence for that is wafer thin
Evidence for what? Palpatine's possible motivations for wanting Skywalker for a powerful apprentice after he's become essentially immortal are irrelevent. We know as a matter of canon fact that he wanted Skywalker for a powerful Vader-replacement apprentice AND that he was immortal and had all these grand schemes developed.
My explanation is just a suggestion. But any suggestion proposing rationalization is preferable to one implying contradiction, which is why I am right and you are wrong. Because I don't magically forget canon policy when I want to toss something I don't like for subjective reasons.
Vympel wrote:Saying that it was a "back up plan" reeks of EU supremacism. If anything was the back up plan, it was this cloning rule the universe etc business.
You're asking me to believe that anyone's plan will have him die and be replaced by someone else ahead of their immortality and permanent rule? That is cretinuously stupid.
Besides, the EU is supreme because ROTS does not describe Palpatine's aims aside from a pre-Empire, pre-life transfer formula twenty-five years prior to Palpatine's newer plans. One is allowed to change their mind or brainstorm. That does not constitute an EU-canon contradiction.
Vympel wrote:The DE Sourcebook might put some doubt to that- your quote indicates for example that he might not be "all there"- which just adds to the lunacy of DE Palpatine in general.
You're a moron. That is a reference to the dark spot left above Endor that Leia encountered in
Dark Force Rising.
Please, explain what part of Palpatine was left behind such that he is a "lunatic" in
Dark Empire? Explain in of itself, how is Palpatine a lunatic in
Dark Empire? Is it because he set up a proxy/contrived conflict and killed trillions? Because he mindfucked a powerful Jedi Knight in order to gain a new Sith Apprentice? Because that is SO MUCH DIFFERENT than the prequel trilogy, let me tell you.
You have yet to account for what is fundamentally different about the character of the Emperor in ROTJ than ROTS, especially considering he was, already, a clone in ROTJ. Like I paraphrased from Publius before, this is like claiming that Macbeth in Act III is different than Macbeth of Act II because of the emotional trauma caused by murdering the King. Its absurd.
Vympel wrote:That is subject to debate.
Than debate it. I'm not interested in your
a priori assertions of truth.
Vympel wrote:Frankly, the Palpatine of DE can hardly be described as having "matured". He's a fricking lunatic, even more so than the character in the films.
How is he objectively more of a lunatic? All I see is subjective handwavium to try and engineer an irreconcilable conflict between the movies and DE such that you can waive the canonical content of DE, just as I originally asserted.
Thankfully, you're doing a very good job of fucking that up and making yourself just look like a guy with an agenda trying to twist analysis to his subjective whims.
The
only thing which can disprove the sameness of being for Palpatine in DE and Palpatine in ROTJ is Return of the Jedi. I would like to see ONE single objective fact presented about the Emperor in ROTJ which makes it impossible for him to be the fundamentally same person in DE like every single EU source says he is.
And Palpatine began developing Byss and his dark side adepts and immortality and life-sucking long before ROTJ, so I don't really see how the ROTJ death will allow you to waive it as "insane clone ravings."
There is explicit canonical reference to a continuity of consciousness from ROTS to ROTJ to DE. DE Palpatine is not objectively insane or mentally ill relative to his appearance in ROTJ, and therefore they are fundamentally the same person. Don't like it due to personal taste?
