StarDestroyer.Net BBS

In further honor of this date, the cards I have made to represent myself on various boards:



In even further honor of this date:

If I may.

A picture of Lord Yu to be used.

When put into play add a +0/+1 counter to Soontir. Add a counter every two turns until Soontir is put out of play by graveyard or back to the hand.

"His post gradually gets better every hour he's awake but he's still incoherent as Lord Yu."

If there's any/all changes you like to make that you think fits me, they're fine with me.

To clarify, this is Lord Yu.



Sorry about the mix-up.

Heheh, that's goood.

Edit: Oopse, I meant "posts" too. See what I mean, my mind is sooo not here.

Sorry, generally if I don't recognize a reference, I just assume its their avatar.

Anybody do the Kung-fu master yet?



<edit>Removed some of the abilities to make the card easier to read.</edit>

Brian

brianeyci wrote:Anybody do the Kung-fu master yet?
-Picture-

Brian

I'm sorry, but I can't read all the text on the card.

-Nice cards BTW.

Purging ASVSers
BBB



1 black destroy target original ASVS member.
must activate enchant ment at least once a turn.
if there are no original ASVSers then demote ASVSer turned Moderator or higher.

Brian

Just a quick little one I thought up. I'm not up on the rules, and just can't get the symbols to work. Comments/thoughts? The idea is that the target becomes hard to kill, but every one wants them dead.

It should be an enchant creature if it's supposed to be attached to creatures.

Rogue 9 wrote:It should be an enchant creature if it's supposed to be attached to creatures.

No it should be
Card Name
Enchantment – Aura
Enchant creature
Rest of text.

Is that better? Does it need anything else? (other than symbols, which I can't seem to add)

Vanas wrote:Is that better? Does it need anything else? (other than symbols, which I can't seem to add)

You can insert Symbols like so:

<T> (Tap sign)
<X> (X)
<R> (Red mana)
<U> (Blue mana)
<B> (Black mana)

and so on.

of course <*> and <w> work for white manna

I apologize for the necro, but I figured the changes being undertaken by our leadership deserve immortalization in card form.

Man, that's Brillant.

I have an idea for a card of myself, but it's based on my LARP character, who has a good number of special abilities. I figure I can get at least four or five cards by dividing up those abilities. Should I go for it, or is it too much?

CDiehl wrote:I have an idea for a card of myself, but it's based on my LARP character, who has a good number of special abilities. I figure I can get at least four or five cards by dividing up those abilities. Should I go for it, or is it too much?

What does it entail? I could help in the design, if you need me to.

Glimmervoid wrote:

Rogue 9 wrote:It should be an enchant creature if it's supposed to be attached to creatures.

No it should be
Card Name
Enchantment – Aura
Enchant creature
Rest of text.

Wtf when did Auras make Enchant Creatures obsolete?

Noble Ire wrote:I apologize for the necro, but I figured the changes being undertaken by our leadership deserve immortalization in card form.
<snib>

So ... what's a peon?

What does it entail? I could help in the design, if you need me to.

Well, the skills I've chosen for the cards, of which there's 5 versions, work a particular way and aren't all that flexible. Also, in translating the skills into Magic terms, they get a little elaborate, using counters a lot, Some of them might be designed to address situations that wouldn't be found in Magic. Also, some of the cards have up to 5 different abilities, so I might have to edit them down. I'll PM the write-ups I've done to you, so I don't clutter the thread.

Surlethe wrote:

Noble Ire wrote:I apologize for the necro, but I figured the changes being undertaken by our leadership deserve immortalization in card form.
<snib>

So ... what's a peon?

Those of lower status or worth; underlings, or menial workers.

In other words, us.

Noble Ire wrote:Those of lower status or worth; underlings, or menial workers.

In other words, us.

Well, yes. In terms of cards, though; are you just going to have every card not a Senator+ be a peon?

Surlethe wrote:

Noble Ire wrote:Those of lower status or worth; underlings, or menial workers.

In other words, us.

Well, yes. In terms of cards, though; are you just going to have every card not a Senator+ be a peon?

If you hadn't noticed, not every SDN series MtG card here is entirely functional, or effective.
Nevertheless, I suppose I could remedy the probelm with a few new cards. I'll get back to you on that.