Page 28 of 50

Re: SDN Worlds 4 Commentary Thread VI

Posted: 2011-06-28 08:59am
by Steve
Zor wrote:Fin, do a google search for "Nuggan" :P

Zor
LMAO. :mrgreen:

Re: SDN Worlds 4 Commentary Thread VI

Posted: 2011-06-28 09:04am
by Fingolfin_Noldor
I protest. It was Shroom's idea to declare Spanish heresy. I am merely taking the whole idea to its most logical conclusion.

Be fortunate I didn't ban the Christmas. :D

Re: SDN Worlds 4 Commentary Thread VI

Posted: 2011-06-28 09:17am
by PeZook
People should now point gigantic hyperwave dishes at the Imperials, broadcasting Spanish monologues 24/7

Re: SDN Worlds 4 Commentary Thread VI

Posted: 2011-06-28 09:35am
by White Haven
I'm sure the Umgah are even now repositioning their hyperwave casters.

Re: SDN Worlds 4 Commentary Thread VI

Posted: 2011-06-29 12:42am
by Force Lord
May the Fail be with us. :P

Re: SDN Worlds 4 Commentary Thread VI

Posted: 2011-06-29 03:57am
by Shroom Man 777
Speaking of which. The Centrality. What do you call that ESPer Nation?

An ESPN.

badum-tish

Re: SDN Worlds 4 Commentary Thread VI

Posted: 2011-06-29 01:39pm
by Master_Baerne
I see what you did there. :)

In other news, work continues on the next installment of Ascendant plotting...

Re: SDN Worlds 4 Commentary Thread VI

Posted: 2011-06-29 07:08pm
by Kartr_Kana
So I haven't been following the Story Thread as closely as I should be, but I was reading it again over the last couple days. A couple posts stuck out due to the usage of Heim drive. Now it had been my understanding (IIRC it was covered heavily when Lost were found), that dual drive ships were rare. Their inherent slowness coupled with the logistical problem of providing parts (and fuel) for two different drive systems, not to mention the training, meant dual drive vessels are almost only ever found on private vessels.

Now I bring this up because if dual drive ships are fairly common amongst militaries then, the Heim Gunships that White_Haven is playing with, the Lost ships, warp missiles used by at least two nations, Simon's shoal space "Romulanoids" and the Hiigaran tactical hyperspace jump, are no longer interesting little cultural quirks. These are all things that are predicated, on Heim drive being uncommon enough, that the usage of Heim drives (or short range tactical jumps) becomes important enough to warrant mention.

Also Master_Baerne if the Ascendancy Starfleet is equipped with Heim drives and uses them for lightspeed maneuvers, why were they caught off balance by tactical jump? Shouldn't they have tactics in place to deal with light speed maneuvers?

Ok back to finishing my history so I can have something to show KhorneFlakes. Once that's hashed out I'll crank out the next stage of our interaction White_Haven. After that there is Coalition work to be done and then 3401 build plans to be unveiled, followed by some other stories I haven't gotten around to finishing. Whoo one at a time.

Re: SDN Worlds 4 Commentary Thread VI

Posted: 2011-06-29 09:28pm
by Shroom Man 777
We can say that the Ascendancy ship was a dedicated patroller that uses both hyperdrive and Heim drive to be able to navigate all sorts of interstellar climate conditions, at the expense of less space for offensive weaponry. Littoral Combat Spaceship!

Like, how some kind of warship that can fight both submerged and surfaced would be not as effective as either a dedicated surface ship or a submarine, yet has more "flexibility".

Re: SDN Worlds 4 Commentary Thread VI

Posted: 2011-06-29 09:44pm
by Master_Baerne
The short answer is, I forgot Heim drives were rare in this game - been reading too much TGG lately, it would seem. Oops...

The long answer/spur-of-the-moment justification is, after the Hiigaran/Ascendant joint exercises, several Ascendant Starfleet ships were retrofitted with Heim drives, precisely because they were caught off guard during the exercises. The drop in performance was deemed acceptable because the refitted ships were mostly patrol ships, and wouldn't be fighting proper warships unless something went disastrously wrong anyway - the ability to surprise an opponent was decided to be more valuable than the relative ineffectiveness of the ship was destrimental. How's that?

Re: SDN Worlds 4 Commentary Thread VI

Posted: 2011-06-29 10:33pm
by Simon_Jester
A handful of dual-drive vessels intended mainly for shoal patrol and similar functions is fine.

For nations whose military does a lot of shoal work, dual-drives are legitimate as a common (if not routine) feature of the national fleet. Note that "a lot" basically means "lives in shoals," as do the Lost or my NPC Kavoolites.

Anyone who says that they can use dual-drive tactics to dominate enemy fleets when those fleets have comparable point value, except possibly as a home court advantage in shoals, will be crushified.

Heim drives aren't rare as such, they're just big honking things that take up a lot of space and thus compromise a warship's combat power. It takes a great deal of practice in Heim-maneuver tactics to make up for the loss of weapons, protection, and other qualities. Nations that are not experienced in such tactics will find the Heim drive to be considerably less effective than one might expect.

How's that?

Re: SDN Worlds 4 Commentary Thread VI

Posted: 2011-06-29 11:22pm
by Fingolfin_Noldor
I think Heim drives should have less accuracy for tight room maneuvers.

Re: SDN Worlds 4 Commentary Thread VI

Posted: 2011-06-29 11:24pm
by Kartr_Kana
Ok sorry about that, I just wanted to make sure the game hadn't gone in a completely different direction when I wasn't looking.

Re: SDN Worlds 4 Commentary Thread VI

Posted: 2011-06-29 11:37pm
by Master_Baerne
Nah, this game comes equipped with proper warning lights and a back-up beeper, just like trucks! :D

Re: SDN Worlds 4 Commentary Thread VI

Posted: 2011-06-30 12:02am
by Force Lord
Let it be known to those involved in the human side of the MEH stomp that the googledoc for placing the forces of the HumaCoal is now available. Tianguo, Umeria, Klavostan, and the Centrality already have their numbers up.

Re: SDN Worlds 4 Commentary Thread VI

Posted: 2011-06-30 12:07am
by Simon_Jester
Fingolfin_Noldor wrote:I think Heim drives should have less accuracy for tight room maneuvers.
I am on board with this, though with the caveat "...unless you are very, very good at it. Which you probably aren't, not without a really good reason."

What really matters is point balance, to be honest.

Re: SDN Worlds 4 Commentary Thread VI

Posted: 2011-06-30 01:10am
by Agent Sorchus
Slow clap Shroom, slow clap. I was wondering which five vessels of the PRFY you would choose.

Re: SDN Worlds 4 Commentary Thread VI

Posted: 2011-06-30 11:02am
by White Haven
To clarify, as well, my Heim-drive gunship experimental squadron is not dual-drive. They sacrifice hyperspace capaibility entirely in return for a Heim-drive FTL system. That gives them effectively no strategic FTL capability, in return for a potentially remarkable tactical FTL drive. Notice that I said potentially. The Hermes, if it ever goes anywhere, is going to require time to iterate both technology and doctrine and also train pilots in that highly unusual form of combat. That's why it's one evaluation wing aboard a fleet carrier that carries ten wings of gunships normally, and also why that carrier's CAG is so pissed to have them there. Well, that and because he's a traditionalist, and hyperspace gunships are what RKS carriers do.

Re: SDN Worlds 4 Commentary Thread VI

Posted: 2011-06-30 11:51am
by Simon_Jester
Hmm, Fin.

It would seem that others have seen your excommunication... and excommunicated you right back! Hurrah for schisms!

Re: SDN Worlds 4 Commentary Thread VI

Posted: 2011-06-30 11:52am
by Fingolfin_Noldor
Simon_Jester wrote:Hmm, Fin.

It would seem that others have seen your excommunication... and excommunicated you right back! Hurrah for schisms!
It's more of a reinforcement of existing excommunications. Even on Nova Terra, while most of the Orthodox Church might follow the one on Terra, I doubt it's a universal thing.

Re: SDN Worlds 4 Commentary Thread VI

Posted: 2011-06-30 12:15pm
by Simon_Jester
Good stuff, Siege. Was that co-written with Fin, or done on your own?

Re: SDN Worlds 4 Commentary Thread VI

Posted: 2011-06-30 12:31pm
by Siege
Written with Fingolfin, as credited on the top of the post :). Most of it was his ideas, too.

Re: SDN Worlds 4 Commentary Thread VI

Posted: 2011-06-30 12:46pm
by Simon_Jester
Siege wrote:Written with Fingolfin, as credited on the top of the post :). Most of it was his ideas, too.
Sorry, didn't notice.

Also, amusing jarring things into action. I think I'll rush through a few bits I consider necessary to set up my own involvement and throw my characters in, though I don't want to be involved in major strategic decision-making since the various fleet admirals and crown princes of the major Coalition fleets outrank my guy badly.

Re: SDN Worlds 4 Commentary Thread VI

Posted: 2011-06-30 01:42pm
by Force Lord
Couldn't help but jump in. :P

Re: SDN Worlds 4 Commentary Thread VI

Posted: 2011-06-30 01:50pm
by White Haven
About time someone started pointedly tapping a watch and glaring at the Shinrans. :)